Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
|
Hi, Good catch! The omission of Articles 4 to 6 in “The Constitutional Foundation: Enforcing Architectural Discipline” is intentional. The Specification-Driven Development (SDD) document is still being finalized, and those sections are placeholders for future content—specifically, they’ll cover governance and evolution topics that weren’t ready at the time of publication. In other words, nothing is missing by accident; those articles just haven’t been written yet and will be included in a later revision of the SDD. |
|
That’s a fair point — true, the constitution can vary between projects depending on scope and maturity. The missing articles are just placeholders in this case, meant for when we unify the governance parts later on. Appreciate you raising it though — helps us keep the docs clearer for everyone. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
In the Specification-Driven Development (SDD) document, why are Articles 4 to 6 missing from "The Constitutional Foundation: Enforcing Architectural Discipline"?
All reactions