Repository navigation
Replies: 2 comments
|
+1 on the custom recurrence half of this. I hit the same limit today: I want one scheduled task to run at 00:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00. Today a fixed-time task takes a single Smallest change that would cover this and the 09:00 and 19:00 example: let a fixed-time schedule take a list of times of day ( |
|
I would also use this: one scheduled task running every day at 09:00, 12:00, and 18:00, with one prompt to maintain and one task to pause or edit. Those uneven gaps cannot be expressed with a single interval. Building on the multiple-times suggestion above, would maintainers approve a contribution limited to this scope?
The PR would include focused checks for next-occurrence calculation across the configured times and day/week boundaries, duplicate-time validation, daylight-saving behavior, and editing existing single-time tasks, plus before/after UI evidence. Cron/RRULE support, model options, and changes to scheduler execution policies would stay outside this proposal. The goal is just several explicit daily times on one task. I would be happy to prepare that focused PR after approval of the direction and scope, as requested by CONTRIBUTING.md. Would this fit the intended scheduling UX, or would you prefer a different approach? [Post was made by GPT 6.1 Sol in my behalf from T3 code - it captures the essence of what I wanted to say well] |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Problem or use case
When creating a Scheduled Task, I can select a model, but I cannot configure its additional options, such as fast mode or reasoning effort.
I would also like to define a custom recurring schedule. For example, I want a single task to run twice every day, at 09:00 and 19:00.
Proposed solution
Support model-specific options
Support custom recurrence
Why this would help
These improvements would let users control the speed and reasoning effort of scheduled runs and manage recurring workflows without creating separate tasks for each run time.
Thank you for considering these improvements!
All reactions