Skip to content

Interpretation of type Any & T [continuation] #37

Open

Description

@CarliJoy

As github sucks for long thread this is merly the continuation of #31.
Please consider opening new issues if you start discussion on new topics, so issues don't get too long.

Activity

  1. mark-todd commented on Jan 11, 2024

    @mark-todd
    Collaborator

    Thanks @CarliJoy, it's a good idea.

    I feel like we're getting somewhere - the proposal currently on the table seems to have few disadvantages. I'll prepare something in the repo that summarises the advantages, and the two potential issues pointed out by @erictraut. Perhaps it's worth opening separate threads for each of these.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions