You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Trends across years from per-year fingerprints #129
@lazarusA I have a question on the forecast part in here. How extensive and deep should it be? So the forecast options that I was looking into are:
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: Theil–Sen trend
What it does: Straight-line trend for each month × hour cell, extended forward
Good: Not thrown off by odd years like 2003 or 2018; simple to explain; works with 21 years
Weak: Only straight lines; assumes the past trend continues
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: Least-squares trend (I am familiar with it from university)
What it does: Same straight line, ordinary fit
Good: Simplest, standard error ranges
Weak: One odd year can tilt the line
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: ARIMA / Prophet
What it does: Statistical model on the monthly series
Good: Handles year-to-year carry-over
Weak: Prophet needs a Python or R server; ranges widen fast, one of the most complex to implement
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: Real model data (CMIP6 land-carbon output)
What it does: Actual climate-model projections, run under different emission scenarios
Good: The only option that's a real forecast
────────────────────────────────────────
I would appreciate your feedback here. How you were doing your visualization forecasts before?
Activity
aivanchenk commentedon Oct 22, 2026
@lazarusA I have a question on the forecast part in here. How extensive and deep should it be? So the forecast options that I was looking into are:
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: Theil–Sen trend
What it does: Straight-line trend for each month × hour cell, extended forward
Good: Not thrown off by odd years like 2003 or 2018; simple to explain; works with 21 years
Weak: Only straight lines; assumes the past trend continues
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: Least-squares trend (I am familiar with it from university)
What it does: Same straight line, ordinary fit
Good: Simplest, standard error ranges
Weak: One odd year can tilt the line
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: ARIMA / Prophet
What it does: Statistical model on the monthly series
Good: Handles year-to-year carry-over
Weak: Prophet needs a Python or R server; ranges widen fast, one of the most complex to implement
────────────────────────────────────────
Option: Real model data (CMIP6 land-carbon output)
What it does: Actual climate-model projections, run under different emission scenarios
Good: The only option that's a real forecast
────────────────────────────────────────
I would appreciate your feedback here. How you were doing your visualization forecasts before?