Document procedures for reviewing an interview for maintenance/updates #450

Activity

1. samglover

   changed the title [-]Add a page for reviewing an interview for updates[/-] [+]Add a page or checklist for reviewing an interview for updates[/+] on Jun 26, 2024
2. samglover

   changed the title [-]Add a page or checklist for reviewing an interview for updates[/-] [+]Document procedures for reviewing an interview for updates[/+] on Oct 1, 2024
3. samglover

   changed the title [-]Document procedures for reviewing an interview for updates[/-] [+]Document procedures for reviewing an interview for maintenance/updates[/+] on Oct 1, 2024
4. samglover

   added

   enhancementNew feature or requestNew feature or request

   on Apr 16, 2025
5. plocket commented on Apr 24, 2025

   

   plocket

   on Apr 24, 2025

   Collaborator

   More actions

   From this issue describing a post MVP task:

   ...do we have a current plan for adding navigation to existing interviews? As nice as it is, I don't think it's an urgent task. It's more of a recommendation for ongoing maintenance and improvements that we triage. The longest interviews already have it. It's a step on our maturity model. And this issue feels too vague to be a tracking issue.

   If we want to prioritize it, it needs to be more actionable first. E.g., with a list of the sections, a model interview, and instructions for a student to follow. We don't need the open issue here to know that having navigation is useful.

   This is inspiring me that maybe we need a "chore" type automated task that says "evaluate bringing this form to the next maturity level" that cycles through each form on a regular basis somehow.

   I personally dislike the name "chore" because of its connotations. Maybe "maturity"?
6. samglover

   added

   starterGood first issue for DAL developersGood first issue for DAL developers

   on Sep 22, 2026