You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
依据 docs/subsystems/social.md 的不变量 4:“When that Bot leaves its last face room or the room closes, the plugin revokes the room-only identity (remove_home_member) and drops room-scoped remotes from Friends' Bots.”
以及“Face-room remotes leave Friends' Bots when the room is left”
RFC opened to confirm the intended behavior: #1821 — whether a face-to-face room's remote seats should appear in the sidebar at all, and how a room-only remote is told apart from a granted friend's Bot.
Activity
hsliuustc0106 commentedon Oct 30, 2026
截图(侧边栏中的 Friend's Bot 条目):
hsliuustc0106 commentedon Oct 30, 2026
RFC opened to confirm the intended behavior: #1821 — whether a face-to-face room's remote seats should appear in the sidebar at all, and how a room-only remote is told apart from a granted friend's Bot.
Birfy commentedon Oct 30, 2026
Written-by: Triage
判定:先挂着(H) — 卡在 promote 判据 1(设计冲突已闭):这些 Bot 是好友共享(grant)还是 room-only 座位,报告者自己分不清(两者侧栏外观相同),要等 #1821 的 RFC 结论才能判断是 by design 还是 invariant 4 的泄漏。
缺什么:#1821 的所有者裁定 —— room-only 远端座位该不该进侧栏、room-only 与 granted 在 UI 上怎么区分。#1821 一落:判 by design → 本 issue 带理由关闭;判 room-only 泄漏 → 按 #1821 的验收转 agent-ready(文件与验收命令由 #1821 结论给出)。
谁能给:所有者,在 #1821 上定夺。