You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When the written body is less than the content length, the only error code that fits is internal-error.
But when the written body is more than the content length, perhaps it would make sense to use the existing HTTP-request-body-size(option<u64>) error code which is meant to be for when the body is too long? Alternatively should this also be internal-error?
Then, for both of these, it would be nice to have a proper error code instead of making it an internal error. Perhaps a dedicated HTTP-request-body-content-length-invalid(option<u64>)?
When the written size is less than the content length, HTTP-{request,response}-body-size(option<u64>) is the correct variant to return throw from outgoing-body.finish. The outgoing-body will have to return the correct request/response variant of the error there based on what it was created from.
We need to add documentation to the error-code cases, and this information should be there, and made more explicit in the docs for outgoing-body.finish.
When the written size is less than the content length, HTTP-{request,response}-body-size(option) is the correct variant to return throw from outgoing-body.finish.
Note this is not the case for Wasmtime currently - which throws an internal-error here instead.
This was landed in Wasmtime in bytecodealliance/wasmtime#7591, so is only pending as a documentation update at this point that the error has been extended to apply to sizes less than the expected content length.
Activity
pchickey commentedon Nov 27, 2023
When the written size is less than the content length,
HTTP-{request,response}-body-size(option<u64>)is the correct variant to return throw fromoutgoing-body.finish. The outgoing-body will have to return the correct request/response variant of the error there based on what it was created from.We need to add documentation to the error-code cases, and this information should be there, and made more explicit in the docs for outgoing-body.finish.
guybedford commentedon Nov 27, 2023
Note this is not the case for Wasmtime currently - which throws an
internal-errorhere instead.pchickey commentedon Nov 27, 2023
Thanks - @elliottt can you work on fixing that?
guybedford commentedon Nov 30, 2023
This was landed in Wasmtime in bytecodealliance/wasmtime#7591, so is only pending as a documentation update at this point that the error has been extended to apply to sizes less than the expected content length.