Repository navigation
WebAssembly logo voting #980
Description
It's time to vote on an official WebAssembly logo!
Please leave a 👍 reaction to vote for your favorite logo(s) from the list below. The logo with the most thumbs up after 2 weeks will be deemed the official WebAssembly logo, pending approval from the author to release the assets with a CC0 license. (Other reactions will not be counted.)
These logos were the top 5 submissions to the logo submission thread #112.
EDIT: Voting has ended.
🎉 Congrats to @carlosbaraza with the winning design 🎉 !
We will be ensuring that the assets are properly documented and licensed in the next few days.
The official WebAssembly logo is:
Activity
s3ththompson commentedon Feb 7, 2017
by @Fogaccio
s3ththompson commentedon Feb 7, 2017
by @dcodeIO
s3ththompson commentedon Feb 7, 2017
by @carlosbaraza
s3ththompson commentedon Feb 7, 2017
by @fstark
s3ththompson commentedon Feb 7, 2017
by @ratishphilip
s3ththompson commentedon Feb 7, 2017
Top 5 submissions end here
Good luck to all and thank you to @Fogaccio, @dcodeIO, @carlosbaraza, @fstark, and @ratishphilip for the submissions.
rauschma commentedon Feb 7, 2017
I like #3 by @carlosbaraza. One caveat: the abbreviation for JavaScript is JS, but the abbreviation for WebAssembly isn’t WA, it’s wasm. Maybe put “wasm” instead of “WA” in the box?
kentcdodds commentedon Feb 8, 2017
Maybe that's about to change? ;-)
rauschma commentedon Feb 8, 2017
@kentcdodds Sure, why not. But pronouncing it would be more of a hassle.
kentcdodds commentedon Feb 8, 2017
True... "double-u a" is a bit of a mouth-full 😞
rauschma commentedon Feb 8, 2017
Maybe “dub-a”
zennad commentedon Feb 8, 2017
Or, following wasm being pronounced "wah-sum",
should it be "wah"?
arjun024 commentedon Feb 8, 2017
My vote's for the black part of the design by @carlosbaraza (3rd). No to the blue ones.
MikeNGarrett commentedon Feb 8, 2017
There doesn't appear to be a way to add reactions on the mobile version of github. If you're on mobile, you can switch to desktop at the bottom right of the page.
35 remaining items
sshaw commentedon Feb 11, 2017
Logo 3 only works when the JS logo is included. Otherwise, please no 👎.
InstanceOfAnObject commentedon Feb 12, 2017
I vote for the third because is the only one that is clear and aligned with the rest of the ecosystem.
The first one is also nice but for someone looking at it out of context is can mean anything... it could even represent a trident and a pyramid :)
twknab commentedon Feb 12, 2017
Where can one without exposure to wasm/wa get some exposure? Curious...any good intros or basic projects out there to play?
urrri commentedon Feb 13, 2017
urrri commentedon Feb 13, 2017
urrri commentedon Feb 13, 2017
rossberg commentedon Feb 13, 2017
@carlosbaraza, I suppose you meant @sethlopezme.
mackiedrew commentedon Feb 17, 2017
#3 for sure, so simple
tyler-c commentedon Feb 17, 2017
#3
tsirolnik commentedon Feb 17, 2017
Dropping my logo again, it had many good reactions back then on the other issue
topokel commentedon Feb 17, 2017
Honestly, it's a crime that parts of the working group have led a coup that refuses to add the logo proposed by @tsirolnik, which received a majority of the body's votes. Shameful
carlosbaraza commentedon Feb 17, 2017
@distransient @tsirolnik I like it for the following reasons:
jfbastien commentedon Feb 21, 2017
Two weeks are up, congrats @carlosbaraza on the beautiful design!
Final 👍 count 1228 / 134 / 1496 / 91 / 269.