Skip to content

Interrupting requests makes the model forget everything it has done #2554

Closed

Description

@henrikklee

When interrupting a request because a model goes off rails, then adding an instruction, the model forgets everything it has read or edited thus far. It will always start again reading all the files, making the same edits again, wondering why some changes are already there etc.

Expected behavior:
Interrupting a request and adding a follow up request, the knowledge about what has been read and edited should be present in the context, allowing it to seemlessly pick up where it stopped.

Activity

  1. github-actions commented on Sep 11, 2025

    @github-actions
    Contributor

    This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:

    Feel free to ignore if none of these address your specific case.

  2. self-assigned this
    on Sep 11, 2025
  3. ribelo commented on Sep 11, 2025

    @ribelo
    Contributor

    Yeah, I noticed it today and I can't tell if I saw it before. It basically makes work impossible or at least expansive

  4. thdxr commented on Sep 12, 2025

    @thdxr
    Member
    Image

    couldn't easily recreate but can you recreate and drop a share link so i can inspect? ty

  5. rekram1-node commented on Sep 12, 2025

    @rekram1-node
    Contributor

    related: #2494

  6. ribelo commented on Sep 12, 2025

    @ribelo
    Contributor

    @thdxr #2563

    I made it before you asked. If I will have a session I can share, I’ll do it. For now, you can check if the code I fixed was actually broken, in my opinion it was.

  7. henrikklee commented on Sep 14, 2025

    @henrikklee
    Author

    I cannot share the session of the project where it occurs the most. So far I haven't been able to create an optimal reproduction. It seems to be at least somehow model specific (esp. Grok Code and GPT 4.1).

  8. rekram1-node commented on Sep 14, 2025

    @rekram1-node
    Contributor

    this should actually be fixed on latest

    Dax made some message structure changes

  9. rekram1-node commented on Sep 14, 2025

    @rekram1-node
    Contributor

    Going to close, if anyone has this issue on latest lmk and we can reopen

  10. added a commit that references this issue on Sep 15, 2025
    3450410
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions