You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
[FEATURE]: Adjust Go usage limits after DeepSeek V4 Pro permanent 75% price reduction #28846
"The deepseek-v4-pro model API pricing will be officially adjusted to 1/4 of the original price after the 75% discount promotion ends on 2026/05/31 15:59 UTC."
Output: $3.48 → $0.87 / 1M tokens (75% off permanently)
Additionally, cache-hit input prices across ALL models were permanently reduced to 1/10 of original on April 26, 2026.
The current Go plan limits ($12/5h window, $30/week, $60/month) were set when API costs were 4x higher. DeepSeek V4 Pro is one of Go's primary models, and these cost savings should benefit subscribers.
Proposal
Adjust Go plan usage limits upward to reflect the lower underlying API costs:
5-hour window: increase from ~$12 to at least maintain current token volume (the $12 now buys 4x more tokens)
Weekly/Monthly caps: proportional adjustment
Alternatively, reduce the subscription price to reflect the cost savings
This keeps Go competitive and ensures subscribers benefit from the industry-wide price reductions rather than the savings being absorbed entirely by the platform.
Reacted by kmou424, MingHuiLiu, Yanal kesbeh, Dean Tee, starbound, 丿丨_丨丿, Hasan Bozkurt, 秋末, Jason Ng, DaoDao418 and 74 more
Reacted by DaoDao418, Melynda Rowe, Budhi, GabIsAwesome, Wenbert Del Rosario, AstroNomEsAi, Yiyi Wang, Abelrahman Sheded, ShalokShalom, Dylan and 10 more
changed the title [-]Go plan: DeepSeek V4 Pro permanently reduced to 1/4 price — can usage limits be adjusted?[/-][+][FEATURE]: Adjust Go usage limits after DeepSeek V4 Pro permanent 75% price reduction[/+]on May 22, 2026
Thanks for updating the issue! It now follows the contributing guidelines and the needs:compliance label has been removed. We appreciate you taking the time to revise it.
At the current permanent discounted price (~$0.000876/request), the same $12 should allow ~13,700 requests — 75% more than the current 3,450.
Also worth noting: OpenCode has adjusted these numbers before. Commit #24575 (Apr 27) increased V4 Pro from 1,300 to 3,450 after DeepSeek reduced cache hit pricing. So the mechanism exists — it just hasnt been applied to the 75% discount.
There is a mismatch between actual token consumption calculation and displayed billing amount.Consumption details:
Total input tokens: 367391
Cached tokens: 335232
Thinking tokens: 4182
Output tokens: 6296
The calculated cost based on DeepSeek official price ( approximately $0.0207) is inconsistent with the $0.08 shown on the console.
It is recommended to automatically and regularly synchronize the latest official pricing adjustments of DeepSeek to ensure accurate billing settlement.
DeepSeek model by DeepSeek provider is cheap because they train on your data. In contrast, OpenCode Go explicitly guarantees they won't train on your data. This is also why DeepSeek is more expensive on other third-party providers on OpenRouter.
Sincerely, not only engineers does OpenCode need, but somebody like "customer services". Maybe somebody eloquent in your team can do it. Or it will cause disaster, not a joke. I 've been an OpenCode fan for a long time and am very afraid of that day... @thdxr
Sincerely, not only engineers does OpenCode need, but some customer services. Maybe somebody eloquent in your team can do it. Or it will cause disaster, not a joke. I 'm an OpenCode fan for a long time and am very afraid of that day... @thdxr
Needs somebody to communicates with the community, response timely, friendly and clearly, I mean. I know Anomaly is not a so large team
Most US-based providers like CoreWeave.com/WandB.ai, Fireworks.ai, Together.ai, Baseten.co seem to have the same (non-discounted) rate for DeepSeek v4 Pro as billed by OpenCode Go. Though Anomaly has not disclosed the providers they use, it is likely their pricing is simply a reflection of their provider's.
Would it be possible to give us a special, specially marked as "insecure" maybe option to use deepseek v4 pro or flash through the official deepseek api, at the canonical deepseek v4 api cost?
Would it be possible to give us a special, specially marked as "insecure" maybe option to use deepseek v4 pro or flash through the official deepseek api, at the canonical deepseek v4 api cost?
OpenCode Go already goes through the official DeepSeek API.
Would it be possible to give us a special, specially marked as "insecure" maybe option to use deepseek v4 pro or flash through the official deepseek api, at the canonical deepseek v4 api cost?
OpenCode Go already goes through the official DeepSeek API.
oh, then why dont we get the permanent discount? feels kinda scummy tbh
Would it be possible to give us a special, specially marked as "insecure" maybe option to use deepseek v4 pro or flash through the official deepseek api, at the canonical deepseek v4 api cost?
OpenCode Go already goes through the official DeepSeek API.
oh, then why dont we get the permanent discount? feels kinda scummy tbh
Most US-based providers like CoreWeave.com/WandB.ai, Fireworks.ai, Together.ai, Baseten.co seem to have the same (non-discounted) rate for DeepSeek v4 Pro as billed by OpenCode Go. Though Anomaly has not disclosed the providers they use, it is likely their pricing is simply a reflection of their provider's.
Because OpenCode has signed a ZDR agreement with DeepSeek, the price of the DeepSeek V4 Pro model remains relatively high.
That sounds plausible, but isn’t that just your speculation? Is there any official statement confirming this?
Also, CommandCode also supports ZDR and is powered by DeepSeek, yet their model pricing is 75% off.
Sorry, I only just saw the official reply. Well, I hope DeepSeek V4.1 can come with a more favorable price.
Activity
github-actions commentedon May 22, 2026
This issue doesn't fully meet our contributing guidelines.
What needs to be fixed:
[FEATURE]:, include a verification checkbox and description of the problem/needPlease edit this issue to address the above within 2 hours, or it will be automatically closed.
This issue might be a duplicate of existing issues. Please check:
If you believe this was flagged incorrectly, please let a maintainer know.
[-]Go plan: DeepSeek V4 Pro permanently reduced to 1/4 price — can usage limits be adjusted?[/-][+][FEATURE]: Adjust Go usage limits after DeepSeek V4 Pro permanent 75% price reduction[/+]github-actions commentedon May 22, 2026
Thanks for updating the issue! It now follows the contributing guidelines and the
needs:compliancelabel has been removed. We appreciate you taking the time to revise it.CNiMaster commentedon May 22, 2026
附议
starboundscientist-hue commentedon May 23, 2026
Would be great to get an official confirmation on this either way. The uncertainty is slightly unsettling
linchengyuan commentedon May 23, 2026
Here is a detailed reverse-calculation confirming the issue, with references.
DeepSeek V4 Pro official pricing timeline
What OpenCode Go currently charges (reverse-calculated)
From the Go docs (updated May 23, still showing old quotas):
3,450 × $0.00350 = $12.08 ≈ $12/5h ✓
At the current permanent discounted price (~$0.000876/request), the same $12 should allow ~13,700 requests — 75% more than the current 3,450.
Also worth noting: OpenCode has adjusted these numbers before. Commit #24575 (Apr 27) increased V4 Pro from 1,300 to 3,450 after DeepSeek reduced cache hit pricing. So the mechanism exists — it just hasnt been applied to the 75% discount.
cc @CNiMaster @starboundscientist-hue
maple-j commentedon May 24, 2026
附议
Kinsue commentedon May 24, 2026
Absolutely
qq78781966 commentedon May 25, 2026
+1
daidaiJ commentedon May 25, 2026
+1 ,应该定时同步官方定价的变化,
HongkaiSong commentedon May 25, 2026
+1
arpankanwer commentedon May 25, 2026
+1
79 remaining items
openclawcommits commentedon Jun 21, 2026
my data is useless
WhiteGiverMa commentedon Jun 23, 2026
Sincerely, not only engineers does OpenCode need, but somebody like "customer services". Maybe somebody eloquent in your team can do it. Or it will cause disaster, not a joke. I 've been an OpenCode fan for a long time and am very afraid of that day... @thdxr
WhiteGiverMa commentedon Jun 23, 2026
Needs somebody to communicates with the community, response timely, friendly and clearly, I mean. I know Anomaly is not a so large team
ignoramous commentedon Jun 26, 2026
Most US-based providers like CoreWeave.com/WandB.ai, Fireworks.ai, Together.ai, Baseten.co seem to have the same (non-discounted) rate for DeepSeek v4 Pro as billed by OpenCode Go. Though Anomaly has not disclosed the providers they use, it is likely their pricing is simply a reflection of their provider's.
hamb1y commentedon Jun 27, 2026
Would it be possible to give us a special, specially marked as "insecure" maybe option to use deepseek v4 pro or flash through the official deepseek api, at the canonical deepseek v4 api cost?
punkboat commentedon Jun 27, 2026
OpenCode Go already goes through the official DeepSeek API.
hamb1y commentedon Jun 27, 2026
oh, then why dont we get the permanent discount? feels kinda scummy tbh
danieliyahu1 commentedon Jul 2, 2026
Anyone has update regarding that? I wonder if I should use opencode go or use deepseek api directly
hamb1y commentedon Jul 2, 2026
no clue xd
hamb1y commentedon Jul 2, 2026
prob should just use api for deepseek for now
dynodevv commentedon Jul 6, 2026
#28846 (comment)
OC Go also has ZDR, DeepSeek API does not
dynodevv commentedon Jul 6, 2026
jinyu2022 commentedon Jul 11, 2026
Sorry, I only just saw the official reply. Well, I hope DeepSeek V4.1 can come with a more favorable price.
dynodevv commentedon Jul 26, 2026
Seems like Go uses the discounted price now 🎉
ignoramous commentedon Jul 26, 2026
Not for Zen.