GLIBC_2.25 Required -> Need An Alternative

I am facing:
opencode/bin/opencode: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.25' not found (required by opencode/bin/opencode)

Does OpenCode offer a binary compiled from older GLIBC versions like Neovim does? Or perhaps an appimage might work in this case?

I'm on an older machine for work, with no opportunity to upgrade GLIBC :(

Would https://distrobox.it/ help?

@arsham

Would https://distrobox.it/ help?

This may just work @arsham -> thanks for the reply!! :)

Same issue here on a compute cluster.

@202512

the release pre-build binary was built on new version os.
event the *-musl version depends on glibc :

Failed to load lib 71 | Set BUN_PTY_LIB or ensure one of these paths contains the file.`);
72 | }
73 | var libPath = resolveLibPath();
74 | var lib;
75 | try {
76 |   lib = dlopen(libPath, {
             ^
error: Failed to open library "/tmp/.1e7fff7e34beff7e-00000001.so": Error relocating /tmp/.1e7fff7e34beff7e-00000001.so: gnu_get_libc_version: symbol not found
 syscall: "dlopen",
   errno: 0,
    code: "ERR_DLOPEN_FAILED"

      at dlopen (bun:ffi:345:28)
      at <anonymous> (../../node_modules/.bun/bun-pty@0.4.2/node_modules/bun-pty/dist/index.js:76:9)
      at <anonymous> (/$bunfs/root/src/index.js:28:48)
      at <anonymous> (src/pty/index.ts:35:23)

my temp workaround is run in docker with ubuntu 24.04
(for opencode v1.0.134 @202512)

I'm making appimage releases that work even in ubuntu 14.04:

https://github.com/pkgforge-dev/opencode-AppImage-Enhanced

For the time being, I'm using my fork where I'm building a compatible version with Docker: https://github.com/pedropombeiro/opencode.

Then I just installed it using mise:

mise install github:pedropombeiro/opencode@v1.1.35-legacy-glibc

To stay organized issues are automatically closed after 90 days of no activity. If the issue is still relevant please open a new one.

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

GLIBC_2.25 Required -> Need An Alternative #3045

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

GLIBC_2.25 Required -> Need An Alternative #3045

Description

Activity

arsham commented on Oct 8, 2025

james-gour commented on Oct 10, 2025

moritzschaefer commented on Nov 8, 2025

yurenchen000 commented on Dec 9, 2025

Samueru-sama commented on Dec 30, 2025

pedropombeiro commented on Jan 25, 2026

github-actions commented on Mar 27, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions