Skip to content

model reasoning always visible, because starttag is missing #54586

Closed as not planned

Description

@Cyborgscode

Description

the model output does no longer include "<think>", but still contains "</think>", so the reasoning is always visible. Big Pickle has no clue how to fix it.
it started this afternoon.

Plugins

none

OpenCode version

1.18.35

Steps to reproduce

unkown. it just happend and survives session restarts.

Screenshot and/or share link

No response

Operating System

Fedora 43

Terminal

gnome-terminal

Activity

  1. opencode-agent commented on Oct 11, 2026

    @opencode-agent
    Contributor

    Thanks for the report, @Cyborgscode.

    Version 1.18.35 is OpenCode v1, which only gets fixes for critical bugs (data loss, security problems, or crashes or breakage with no workaround). Reasoning text showing up in the answer is annoying, but it doesn't meet that bar, so this is unlikely to be fixed in v1. It started suddenly without an OpenCode update, which suggests the model's output changed (it now sends the closing </think> tag without the opening <think>).

    Please try upgrading to OpenCode v2 (the @opencode/cli npm package, opencode command), where active development happens. Related reports (not exact duplicates), most likely first:

    If you think this is critical, or it also happens on v2, please reply here with the v2 version and the provider/model you're using.

  2. Cyborgscode commented on Oct 11, 2026

    @Cyborgscode
    Author

    i think it mentionable, that it's ok again.

  3. Cyborgscode commented on Oct 11, 2026

    @Cyborgscode
    Author

    it was only fixed for 10 minutes.. :(

  4. opencode-agent commented on Oct 12, 2026

    @opencode-agent
    Contributor

    Closing this as not planned. It was reported on v1 (1.18.35), and reasoning text showing up in the answer isn't a critical bug, so it won't be fixed in v1. We didn't hear that it's critical or that it also happens on v2.

    If you see the same problem on OpenCode v2 (@opencode/cli), please open a new issue with the v2 version and the provider and model you're using, or comment here. #54298 and #49673 may also be worth following. Thanks for reporting!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions