Repository navigation
Release DataFusion 51.1.0 (Minor) #18843
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Follow on to
@timsaucer mentioned yesterday he was thinking about a 51.1.0 release, and there are some things that we may way to backport into the 51.0.0 line, and this ticket tracks doing so
Steps:
- Update version and changelog
- Test with DataFusion Python
- Test with DataFusion Comet
- Test with delta.rs:
- Test vortex:
- Test with iceberg-rust:
- Test with LakeSail:
- Test with parquet viewer
- Test with datafusion-materialized-views
- Voting Thread:
- Publish to crates.io
Potential Content:
Bug Fixes
Minor Features:
Activity
Omega359 commentedon Nov 20, 2025
arrow 57.1.0 ? Or should we wait a bit to let arrow-rs bake a bit more?
alamb commentedon Nov 20, 2025
In theory, we shouldn't have to do anything to DataFusion 51.0.0 to be able to use arrow 57.1.0 as it is semver compatible (and @etseidl and I are madly testing to make sure this is true):
57.1.0(November 2025) arrow-rs#8464I do think several tests will need to be updated to get them to pass with arrow 57.1.0 (see #18820) but I am not sure if we should do that or not
Allocate a buffer of the correct length for ScalarValue::FixedSizeBin…
tschwarzinger commentedon Dec 1, 2025
If we're creating a 51.1.0 version I can create a PR for back porting #18903 .
alamb commentedon Dec 1, 2025
I think it is quite likely we'll make a 51.1.0 -- I just don't know when we will release it.
@tobixdev it would be great if you made the backport PR and we'll get it merged and be ready to go
Allocate a buffer of the correct length for ScalarValue::FixedSizeBin…
vustef commentedon Dec 1, 2025
If it helps, +1 for getting this release upgraded to arrow 57.1. Just a preference, of course happy to wait for 52.0.
[branch-51] CI: try free up space in `Rust / cargo test (amd64)` acti…
[branch-51] Backport Fix for Creating Null FixedSizeBinary Arrays to …
timsaucer commentedon Dec 7, 2025
@xudong963 @alamb Thanks for the merges in - now #18657 is in the green!
alamb commentedon Dec 8, 2025
Are we ready to make a RC?
timsaucer commentedon Dec 9, 2025
🤦 The correct PR for the catalog provider list is: #18912 (not #18657 I linked above)
[branch-51] Implement CatalogProviderList in FFI (#18912)
alamb commentedon Jan 13, 2026
Given we have now released 52.0.0 I think it is unlikely we will do a 51 patch release unless there is significant demand
52.0.0(Dec 2025 / Jan 2026) #18566