Repository navigation
Release DataFusion 16 #4776
Description
Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? Please describe what you are trying to do.
It has been ~4 weeks since the last release. I would like to release the next version soon (aiming for Friday, Jan 6).
Describe the solution you'd like
Release tasks
- Confirm that project is still compatible with Python bindings
- Run benchmarks and confirm no major regressions
Post-release tasks
- Blog post about datafusion 16 release #4804
- Publish user guide: DataFusion 16.0.0 documentation arrow-site#301
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
Activity
tustvold commentedon Dec 31, 2022
Do let me know if I've broken anything and I'll try to help out. I think I'm mostly done with the major changes, I can probably defer async catalog support until after the release
andygrove commentedon Jan 2, 2023
@tustvold I managed to bulldoze my way through getting the Python bindings working in apache/datafusion-python#115. Please take a look if you have the time.
I have one issue to fix around window functions, and I will look at that later this week.
alamb commentedon Jan 3, 2023
I would like to write a blog post about DataFusion 16 release. I have started collecting notes on #4804
alamb commentedon Jan 4, 2023
FYI we found some issues with 30.0.0: apache/arrow-rs#3455
andygrove commentedon Jan 10, 2023
The first RC seems to have an issue, so I will plan on creating a new RC once #4869 is merged.
liukun4515 commentedon Jan 11, 2023
merged, Thanks @ygf11
You can create the RC for 16.0.0. cc @andygrove
DDtKey commentedon Jan 11, 2023
I was able to find one more regression against current master: #4875
And one more: #4876
alamb commentedon Jan 11, 2023
Checking them out
alamb commentedon Jan 11, 2023
#4875 looks serious but I could not reproduce it (more details in the ticket)
I think #4876 is expected
DDtKey commentedon Jan 12, 2023
JFYI: as it was discussed - #4875 isn't regression, but the bug existed before.
While #4876 is partially expected.
So probably it doesn't lock release, but it's up to the
datafusionteam 🙂alamb commentedon Jan 22, 2023
I think with apache/arrow-site#301 this issue can now be closed