Review 16 non-PTZ cameras tagged 'autotracking' (digital / e-PTZ / mislabeled)

[ch-bas]

Split out from #124. These 16 cameras mention autotracking in features[] but are not typed ptz/dual-lens, so part-1 migration skipped them (forcing a mechanical ptz.autotracking onto digital tracking would misrepresent them). Each needs a call:

Digital / e-PTZ tracking — likely should NOT get ptz.autotracking (it's software crop-follow, not mechanical):

• hanwha-xnv-8080r [dome] — "digital auto-tracking"
• hanwha-pnd-9080r [dome] — "digital auto tracking"
• acti-b76a [fisheye] — "Digital Auto Tracking"
• acti-b511a [fisheye] — "Digital Auto Tracking"
• hikvision-ds-2cd3746g2-izs [dome] — "e-PTZ patrol and auto tracking"
• hikvision-ds-2sf8c442mxg1-elw [panoramic] — "auto-tracking 3.0"
• hikvision-ds-2sf8c848mxg1-elw [panoramic] — "auto-tracking 3.0"

Mechanical pan/tilt but non-PTZ type — probably ptz.autotracking: true + a type review:

• reolink-omvi-3i-wifi [panoramic] — "4K auto-tracking PT"
• reolink-omvi-3i-poe [panoramic] — "4K auto-tracking PT"
• eufy-floodlight-cam-e30 [floodlight] — "360 pan & tilt with auto-tracking"
• lorex-w452asd [floodlight] — "auto-tracking"

Fixed-cam tags — likely digital or data-quality error (verify against source):

• ubiquiti-ai-pro [bullet], ubiquiti-ai-pro-white [bullet]
• amcrest-ip2m-841b [box]
• lorex-w482cad [bullet]
• bosch-nti-50022-a3 [bullet]

Consider whether digital/e-PTZ tracking deserves its own signal (e.g. a feature tag) distinct from mechanical ptz.autotracking.