You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
LIST 13a. Like Drew's Emanote zettelkasten and the way Mnote looks: chains of topics where note IDs are randomly or timestamp generated and NOT important — because you reference messages/notes by friendly names. You type @ or # plus a phrase, and a search across all the different services resolves what you mean. Investigate: the resolution UX (ambiguity, ranking, whose graph wins), what gets indexed where, and how a resolved reference is stored (stable underlying ID, friendly surface). Deliverable: resolution-flow design sketch with ambiguity cases.
Program: Drew's 2026-10-28 directive (full text: hatch-personal memory/topics/id-program-2026-10-28.md).
Working pattern: parallel investigations, then the named synthesis issue merges them into a full design. Route guidance: Workhorse by default; Specialist/Summit for synthesis and ramification-heavy work. A result that says "done" is not the endpoint — the orchestrator reviews it and may commission another round. Deliverables: a markdown design/investigation doc (mermaid/SVG diagrams welcome) linked from this issue, plus follow-up issues for anything buildable. Build a proof of concept where the design calls for one, but do NOT build the permanent feature on top of an unreviewed PoC.
Acceptance criteria
A markdown investigation doc is linked from this issue with a resolution-flow design sketch for @/# friendly-name references: what gets indexed where, and how cross-service search resolves a phrase.
Ambiguity cases are worked explicitly: duplicate names, ranking, and whose graph wins when several graphs hold a match.
A resolved reference is stored as the stable underlying ID with the friendly name as surface — the sketch states this representation.
Follow-up issues are filed for anything buildable the investigation identifies.
Fleet monitor intake (2026-10-29) — verified still live: no merged PR or commit implements this yet; the filing audit/decision record it cites is current.
Notes: ID-program investigation (LIST 13a) under Drew's 2026-10-28 directive — the Emanote/Mnote model: note IDs are unimportant because references are by friendly name. Feeds synthesis #2048. Part of the batch filed 2026-10-29 ~01:00Z. Deliverable is the resolution-flow sketch.
Suggested approach: Start from the zettelkasten usage pattern (chains of topics) and derive indexing/ranking requirements from the ambiguity cases.
Risks: Resolution that depends on one central index contradicts the multi-graph model — the sketch must keep resolution local-first.
Labels normalized by the monitor; acceptance criteria appended to the body (original text preserved verbatim above it).
Top priority — ID program wave-1. Drew directed this be picked up in the next runs (2026-10-29): enqueued directly as triage task 3355 in repo-health-code-pilot at queue priority 20 (only breakage-class work at priority 10 outranks it). Wave-1 is the ungated investigations and designs; syntheses and PoCs stay gated on their named inputs. Investigation route: Workhorse.
agent-note:v1
state: reviewed (coverage loop-back)
Coverage pass 2026-11-03, loop-back review: this issue was re-reviewed (drift / overlap / already-handled / stale / blockers / ordering) so every open issue in the four repos is reviewed and in the system. Verdict: still live; in the system as task 7276 (triage, queued, priority 50) in repo-health-code-pilot. Labels audited and synced. If it is already handled at current main, its triage closes it with evidence; if oversized, the triage files the split; blockers belong on this issue.
Found via: coverage loop-back 2026-11-03
Activity
developing-today commentedon Oct 29, 2026
CODE-968
dezren39 commentedon Oct 29, 2026
Parent epic: #2056 — ID platform expansion (2026-10-28 directive).
dezren39 commentedon Oct 29, 2026
Intake review
Fleet monitor intake (2026-10-29) — verified still live: no merged PR or commit implements this yet; the filing audit/decision record it cites is current.
Notes: ID-program investigation (LIST 13a) under Drew's 2026-10-28 directive — the Emanote/Mnote model: note IDs are unimportant because references are by friendly name. Feeds synthesis #2048. Part of the batch filed 2026-10-29 ~01:00Z. Deliverable is the resolution-flow sketch.
Suggested approach: Start from the zettelkasten usage pattern (chains of topics) and derive indexing/ranking requirements from the ambiguity cases.
Risks: Resolution that depends on one central index contradicts the multi-graph model — the sketch must keep resolution local-first.
Labels normalized by the monitor; acceptance criteria appended to the body (original text preserved verbatim above it).
dezren39 commentedon Oct 29, 2026
Top priority — ID program wave-1. Drew directed this be picked up in the next runs (2026-10-29): enqueued directly as triage task 3355 in repo-health-code-pilot at queue priority 20 (only breakage-class work at priority 10 outranks it). Wave-1 is the ungated investigations and designs; syntheses and PoCs stay gated on their named inputs. Investigation route: Workhorse.
9 remaining items
developing-today commentedon Nov 3, 2026
agent-note:v1
state: reviewed (coverage loop-back)
Coverage pass 2026-11-03, loop-back review: this issue was re-reviewed (drift / overlap / already-handled / stale / blockers / ordering) so every open issue in the four repos is reviewed and in the system. Verdict: still live; in the system as task 7276 (triage, queued, priority 50) in repo-health-code-pilot. Labels audited and synced. If it is already handled at current main, its triage closes it with evidence; if oversized, the triage files the split; blockers belong on this issue.
Found via: coverage loop-back 2026-11-03
dezren39 commentedon Nov 4, 2026
🤖 Agent note · picked up
dezren39 commentedon Nov 4, 2026
🤖 Agent note · triaged / done