You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Follow-on design ticket from #5678 — its decomposition sketch names this as a separate design, and the parent's acceptance requires these tickets to be filed and linked. Filed in the 2026-11-04 gap pass (WS-F) so the design work exists and can be prioritised on its own merits; implementation timing is a separate decision, possibly months out.
What this design must settle
Local-first vs cloud-first sync for the knowledge layer, conflict resolution, offline editing, end-to-end encryption expectations, and attachment/media sync — reconciled with ID's own sync designs, linked not duplicated.
Context from the parent
The parent is a design-to-make-designs: a competitor feature-matrix programme over the #2048 zettelkasten layer whose deliverable is one follow-on design per cluster and per importer, filed and linked on the parent. The parent issue carries the surrounding decisions this ticket must not re-decide; where this ticket's answer would change a parent decision, record that explicitly rather than silently forking it.
Decision record expected
Close this design with a recorded decision (on this issue or in a doc/ record linked from it): the chosen shape, the alternatives rejected and why, and the invariants implementation must hold. If the design splits further, file the splits and link them here rather than growing this issue.
Relations
Parent: #5678. Programme: epic #2056. Filed by WS-F (2026-11-04 ID design gap & expansion pass).
Reconciliation targets (sync substrate already in tree): ID's own sync is real code, not a blank page — pkgs/id/src/event_sync.rs (event sync over its own ALPN, split from log_sync's /id-sync/1), plus the partial-replication design ticket issue id: design: partial replication protocol (from #5672) #5800 in this same programme family. The knowledge-layer sync design must link/reuse those, as the ticket requires ("reconciled with ID's own sync designs, linked not duplicated") — in particular the local-first/offline questions overlap issue id: design: partial replication protocol (from #5672) #5800's replication protocol, and the two designs should not fork each other's answers.
Activity
developing-today commentedon Nov 5, 2026
CODE-1521
dezren39 commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · done
Triage findings (2026-11-05, verified against current state):
pkgs/id/src/event_sync.rs(event sync over its own ALPN, split fromlog_sync's/id-sync/1), plus the partial-replication design ticket issue id: design: partial replication protocol (from #5672) #5800 in this same programme family. The knowledge-layer sync design must link/reuse those, as the ticket requires ("reconciled with ID's own sync designs, linked not duplicated") — in particular the local-first/offline questions overlap issue id: design: partial replication protocol (from #5672) #5800's replication protocol, and the two designs should not fork each other's answers.