You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
id: design: residency evidence model (from #5683) #5876
Follow-on design ticket from #5683 — its decomposition sketch names this as a separate design, and the parent's acceptance requires these tickets to be filed and linked. Filed in the 2026-11-04 gap pass (WS-F) so the design work exists and can be prioritised on its own merits; implementation timing is a separate decision, possibly months out.
What this design must settle
Declarations, assurance levels, provenance, lifetime, and visibility: the evidence model every boundary decision cites.
Context from the parent
The parent framework — Drew-ruled opt-in and framework-first — fixes how residency evidence, sanctions boundaries, and intranet mode are represented and enforced. The parent issue carries the surrounding decisions this ticket must not re-decide; where this ticket's answer would change a parent decision, record that explicitly rather than silently forking it.
Decision record expected
Close this design with a recorded decision (on this issue or in a doc/ record linked from it): the chosen shape, the alternatives rejected and why, and the invariants implementation must hold. If the design splits further, file the splits and link them here rather than growing this issue.
Relations
Parent: #5683. Programme: epic #2056. Filed by WS-F (2026-11-04 ID design gap & expansion pass).
Triage findings (verified fresh 2026-11-05 via gh):
Issue id: design: residency evidence model (from #5683) #5876 is OPEN. Labels: task/triage, queue/queued, app/id. No hard-stop labels (held, user/owned, do-not-merge, do-not-auto-edit) and no user/review / user/escalated. Only comment is an automated Kaneo cross-link.
Scope to settle (from the body): declarations, assurance levels, provenance, lifetime, and visibility — the evidence model every boundary decision cites. That includes the parent's distinctions: self-declared vs org-attested vs document/provider-verified, expiry/renewal/revocation, and who can see a declaration in what form (exact value vs satisfies-boundary boolean).
Deliverable / close condition: a recorded decision (on this issue or in a doc/ record linked from it): chosen evidence-model shape, alternatives rejected and why, and the invariants implementation must hold. Further splits get filed as their own tickets and linked here.
Activity
developing-today commentedon Nov 5, 2026
CODE-1559
dezren39 commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · done (triage)
Triage findings (verified fresh 2026-11-05 via
gh):task/triage,queue/queued,app/id. No hard-stop labels (held,user/owned,do-not-merge,do-not-auto-edit) and nouser/review/user/escalated. Only comment is an automated Kaneo cross-link.doc/record linked from it): chosen evidence-model shape, alternatives rejected and why, and the invariants implementation must hold. Further splits get filed as their own tickets and linked here.Triage complete for task 10278; issue #5876 stays open for the design decision.