You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
task(licensing): lawyer-question packet — the five open questions on external GitHub content #6055
Parent: #6024 (licensing gate for the external corpus). Research source: prior-art doc ~/workspace/scratch/atlas-ingestion-brief-2026-11-04/prior-art-research.md (2026-11-04). Follow-up 34 (Cluster 6).
Task
Package the five questions the GitHub ToS text does not settle (from the gate research, Cluster 6 of the prior-art doc) for one lawyer review session. Per the gate's answered-provisional framing on #6024: the external design proceeds on the zone rules and Zones 2–3 full text stays personal-search-only meanwhile; this packet is the path to lifting that restriction deliberately. The metadata layer does not wait on it.
Does D.6's inbound=outbound reach issue/PR/discussion comment text, or only contributed files/patches?
Is a private, single-user, non-commercial search index (embeddings + stored text + snippet display to the owner only) over others' public comments fair use in the US? Does storing embeddings change the analysis vs storing text?
What changes if the corpus is ever queried by anyone else (agents acting for Drew? family? a future ID-graph publication)? Where exactly is the redistribution line — snippets in answers? full text in an export?
EU/UK exposure: do text-and-data-mining exceptions apply to a US-based personal user, and do GitHub's terms or repo-level signals constitute an opt-out?
A packet doc (questions + the ToS excerpts + the zone policy) ready to hand to a lawyer, linked from #6024 and the policy decision (sibling under #6024).
{"event":"picked_up","worker":"repo-worker-code","queue":"repo-health-code-pilot","task_id":12993,"lane":"02cafe76-eafd-4d0b-aaa6-2b7a737d68dc","note":"Claimed by OpenChamber scheduled lane. Fresh revalidation: #6055 OPEN, no hard-stop labels, no open PR resolving it, and no packet document found in doc/. Linked #6024 research confirms the five open counsel questions and provisional three-zone policy; #6052 remains OPEN and user/escalated, but that ruling does not block preparing the lawyer packet. Resuming at current origin/main; preserve scope as source-backed questions, not legal advice or posture ratification."}
{"event":"pr_opened","worker":"repo-worker-code","queue":"repo-health-code-pilot","task_id":12993,"lane":"02cafe76-eafd-4d0b-aaa6-2b7a737d68dc","pr":7804,"note":"The lawyer-review packet is ready in PR #7804: doc/2026-11-08T20-11-41Z_legal_external-github-content-lawyer-review/2026-11-08T20-11-41Z_legal_external-github-content-lawyer-review.md. It covers all five questions and links current GitHub ToS/API/AUP, US, EU, UK, and deletion sources. It is not legal advice and does not ratify #6052. PR is OPEN at 5aab90b; basic CI is queued. #6055 will close when the PR merges."
{"event":"done","worker":"repo-worker-code","queue":"repo-health-code-pilot","task_id":12993,"lane":"02cafe76-eafd-4d0b-aaa6-2b7a737d68dc","pr":7804,"note":"Task 12993 completed as pr_opened. PR #7804 is OPEN at 5aab90b and linked from #6055, #6024, and #6052. Basic CI remains QUEUED; no CI wait or merge was part of this packet-delivery outcome. Queue labels set at pickup were removed; #6055 remains OPEN until the PR merges. Sandbox backlog and sweep-log bookkeeping are deferred to fleet reconciliation per lane instructions."}
Activity
developing-today commentedon Nov 5, 2026
CODE-1720
dezren39 commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · handed off
dezren39 commentedon Nov 5, 2026
🤖 Agent note · handed off
opencode, so this task is handed off; the laptop claimant launches the bound opencode session which drives it to its terminal state.151 remaining items
dezren39 commentedon Nov 8, 2026
{"event":"picked_up","worker":"repo-worker-code","queue":"repo-health-code-pilot","task_id":12993,"lane":"02cafe76-eafd-4d0b-aaa6-2b7a737d68dc","note":"Claimed by OpenChamber scheduled lane. Fresh revalidation: #6055 OPEN, no hard-stop labels, no open PR resolving it, and no packet document found in doc/. Linked #6024 research confirms the five open counsel questions and provisional three-zone policy; #6052 remains OPEN and user/escalated, but that ruling does not block preparing the lawyer packet. Resuming at current origin/main; preserve scope as source-backed questions, not legal advice or posture ratification."}
dezren39 commentedon Nov 8, 2026
{"event":"pr_opened","worker":"repo-worker-code","queue":"repo-health-code-pilot","task_id":12993,"lane":"02cafe76-eafd-4d0b-aaa6-2b7a737d68dc","pr":7804,"note":"The lawyer-review packet is ready in PR #7804: doc/2026-11-08T20-11-41Z_legal_external-github-content-lawyer-review/2026-11-08T20-11-41Z_legal_external-github-content-lawyer-review.md. It covers all five questions and links current GitHub ToS/API/AUP, US, EU, UK, and deletion sources. It is not legal advice and does not ratify #6052. PR is OPEN at 5aab90b; basic CI is queued. #6055 will close when the PR merges."
dezren39 commentedon Nov 8, 2026
{"event":"done","worker":"repo-worker-code","queue":"repo-health-code-pilot","task_id":12993,"lane":"02cafe76-eafd-4d0b-aaa6-2b7a737d68dc","pr":7804,"note":"Task 12993 completed as pr_opened. PR #7804 is OPEN at 5aab90b and linked from #6055, #6024, and #6052. Basic CI remains QUEUED; no CI wait or merge was part of this packet-delivery outcome. Queue labels set at pickup were removed; #6055 remains OPEN until the PR merges. Sandbox backlog and sweep-log bookkeeping are deferred to fleet reconciliation per lane instructions."}