Skip to content

Study: what upstream's Project View can teach the fork #831

Closed

Description

@devsuitup

Study, no code: upstream's Project View (ee65652 and follow-ups 3028edd, 47da490, 889908e, 025daed) is not ported as such (decided by JB, 2026-10-28): it is a second navigation model, deletes schedule-ipc.js, rewrites the schedule runner and duplicates the What's new dialog.

Read it for what it teaches the fork: interactions, state handling, scheduling, worktree deletion (it lists the folders a deletion removes), done-track collapsing, snooze, previews. For each idea, say which existing fork feature it would improve, how, and the cost. Output: a report with one proposed issue per worthwhile idea.

Activity

  1. devsuitup commented on Oct 28, 2026

    @devsuitup
    OwnerAuthor

    Study done: issues opened for 7 ideas (see the issues referencing #831) plus a comment on #792. Rejected: project brief, what's-new carousel, list hold (already in the fork), 809b754 (n/a), .env copy into worktrees, the runner rewrite and tracks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions