Skip to content

Adapt language ecosystem native API docs practices wherever possible #1653

Description

@edburns

Work items in this epic deal with bringing all supported languages to parity with Java regarding support for the expected practices for API docs in that language ecosystem.

For Java, we already have:

API Docs Ecosystem Summary

Ecosystem Doc artifact required to publish? Auto-hosted docs site Culture strength
Java ✅ Yes (Maven Central mandate) javadoc.io (3rd party) Strong
Node/TS ❌ No tsdocs.dev (3rd party, unreliable — see note below) Moderate
Python ❌ No Read the Docs (opt-in) Strong convention
Go ❌ No (but comments are the format) pkg.go.dev (1st party, automatic) Very strong
.NET ❌ No (but XML doc conventionally included) fuget.org (3rd party) Strong
Rust ❌ No (but comments are the format) docs.rs (1st party, automatic) Very strong

Note on tsdocs.dev: As of 2026-06-13, tsdocs.dev returns 502 Bad Gateway across all URLs. It is a volunteer-run third-party project with no backing from npm or Microsoft and no SLA. It should not be relied upon as a primary docs hosting solution for @github/copilot-sdk. Self-hosted TypeDoc output (e.g. GitHub Pages from CI) is the only reliable option for TypeScript.

Bottom line: Go and Rust have the closest parity to Java's "publish once, docs appear everywhere" model — but achieved through first-party infrastructure rather than a mandated artifact. Python and .NET have strong doc cultures but require explicit hosting setup. TypeScript is the weakest — tsdocs.dev is unreliable (currently down), so self-hosted docs are a necessity.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

documentationImprovements or additions to documentation

Type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions