You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Co-branding/whitelabel scheme for 3rd parties running VRMS #300
This issue needs to be updated when the time comes. Right now VRMS is an internal tool and it will take time until we are able to run it for 3rd parties. Not priority right now.
Overview
Other organizations will run VRMS and we need a scheme that lets them brand the app appropriately while still identifying the product as VRMS and giving HfLA credit
Acceptance criteria
POV on which kinds of screens and where/how to include VRMS branding
POV on which kinds of screens and where/how to include HfLA branding
POV on which kinds of screens and where/how to include partner-org branding
POV on how to handle light and dark BG partner logos
POV on how to handle various color schemes of partner-org branding
mockups showing examples of branding (placeholder VRMS logo/icon OK until logo redesign completed)
Background
I think HfLA branding as in "Built by Hack for LA" is adequate in the footer area on select main pages. -Adam
VRMS logo presence is striking a balance between taking prominent credit for this amazing piece of software but not hitting users of the head with it too often -Adam
For where to put partner logo, the user story is primarily around letting them reliably/consistently know which partner org they're logged into. I think a decent test might be to imagine a user who belongs to two orgs (e.g., HackOakland and HackPDX) and where would they want to be able to confirm they were logged into the right organization...similar to how sometimes you're logged into the wrong google account and you want to visually double check whether it's personal or your work org, which you can do by looking for your company's logo somewhere. -Adam
I think "Powered by VRMS" text below the client logo is one good option to consider for any places we should co-brand, in addition to the design ideas below -Adam
changed the title [-]Logo/Branding[/-][+]Product needs co-branding/whitelabel scheme for 3rd party organizations running our software[/+]on Sep 15, 2020
changed the title [-]Product needs co-branding/whitelabel scheme for 3rd party organizations running our software[/-][+]Co-branding/whitelabel scheme for 3rd parties running VRMS[/+]on Sep 15, 2020
Activity
[-]Logo/Branding[/-][+]Product needs co-branding/whitelabel scheme for 3rd party organizations running our software[/+][-]Product needs co-branding/whitelabel scheme for 3rd party organizations running our software[/-][+]Co-branding/whitelabel scheme for 3rd parties running VRMS[/+]juliagab56 commentedon Jun 24, 2023
@juliagab56
15 remaining items
juliagab56 commentedon Nov 28, 2023
Updated dependency