Skip to content

Job trends in software development by term frequency #226

Open

Description

@chinaexpert1

Overview

Analyze six-month shifts in software development job postings by comparing March 2025 (now a year ago) to the most recent 30 days, quantifying what skills/technologies are rising, falling, newly in demand, or disappearing. Outputs include frequency deltas, trend lines, and a concise narrative report that’s reproducible and portfolio-ready.

The assignee for this issue will have to wear three hats:

  1. A Data Scientist - Responsible for posing/framing the question(s) and adapting the inquiry according to evidence discovered. An initial hypothes(e)s posed in a report from some intial motivations and investigations. Adapt that hypothesis as insights come in. Create the Final Report for peer review.
  2. A Data Engineer - Cleaning, Prepping data after devising a strategy to scrape old posting via an API. Implement the scraping and shape the data for visualization by the Data Analyst.
  3. A Data Analyst - Responsible for answering the Data Scientist's hypotheses, providing a report to them using the insights from the shaped data. Reports to generate along the way.

Action Items

The beginning (research + design)

  • * Define cohort & windows: titles containing software, developer, engineer, frontend, backend, full-stack, mobile, devops, data engineer, ml engineer; past window = 2022-11-01→2026-03-31, current window = last 30 days.

  • * Select sources:

    • * Federal: USAJOBS HistoricJoa + AnnouncementText (full text, closed postings).
    • * Private sector (optional v1.1): archived postings from Greenhouse/Lever via Wayback snapshots.
  • * Draft skills/tech lexicon with preferred mappings (e.g., whitelist→allowlist, primary/replica vs master/slave; frameworks: React/Vue/Svelte; platforms: Kubernetes, Terraform; languages: Rust/Go/TypeScript; AI terms: LLM, RAG, vector DB).

  • * Methods spec: text extraction & normalization, n-gram and phrase detection, log-odds with informative Dirichlet prior for rise/fall, monthly slope estimation, multiple-testing control (BH-FDR).

  • * Ethics & QA: de-duplicate pages, ignore code blocks, document gaps (unarchived pages), and record rate-limit handling.

If researched and ready (implementation steps)

  • 1. Ingest

    • Pull metadata with GET /api/HistoricJoa for both windows; join long fields with GET /api/HistoricJoa/AnnouncementText (key: USAJOBSControlNumber). ([developer.usajobs.gov]1)
    • (Optional) Enumerate private-sector snapshots via Wayback CDX; select nearest capture to target dates. ([Internet Archive]2)
      .
  • 2. Extract & Normalize * HTML→main text via trafilatura (fallback: Readability/jusText), lowercase, strip boilerplate & code blocks, Unicode normalize. ([trafilatura.readthedocs.io]3)

  • 3.. Feature Build

    • Tokenize; build unigrams/bigrams; apply skill lexicon + regex for variants (e.g., Type-Script|TypeScript); map deprecated→preferred terms.
  • 4. Analysis

    • Compute term frequencies, ΔTF-IDF, and log-odds rise/fall between windows; estimate monthly slope on multi-month series if expanded.
    • Tag new (present now, absent before) and gone (present before, absent now) terms; flag ambiguous terms for manual review.
  • 5. Deliverables

    • CSVs: term_stats_past.csv, term_stats_current.csv, trend_report.csv.
    • Dashboard (Streamlit or Altair/Vega-Lite): top rising/falling skills, new vs gone, per-title breakdown, sample snippets.
    • Methods README with caveats, rate-limit notes, and reproducibility (fixed seeds).
  • 6. Testing & Ops

    • Add unit tests for parsing & counting; retries/backoff; de-duplication via URL+digest; logs with timings and error contexts.
    • Schedule optional monthly refresh via GitHub Actions (artifact publish).

Resources/Instructions

  • USAJOBS APIs (free, historical)

  • Internet Archive / Wayback (for expired private-sector postings)

    • CDX Server API reference & help pages. ([Internet Archive]2)
    • Python clients: waybackpy or edgi/wayback. ([PyPI]5)
  • Extraction

  • Schema hints (when scraping non-federal sites)

    • schema.org/JobPosting and Google’s Job Posting structured data guide. ([Schema.org]6)
  • Suggested stack (choose 1 of each pair)

    • HTTP: httpx or requests
    • Parsing: trafilatura or readability-lxml
    • NLP/Features: scikit-learn or textacy
    • Stats: statsmodels or scipy
    • Viz/Dashboard: Altair/Vega-Lite or Streamlit
    • Archival: waybackpy or edgi/wayback
  • Deliverable spec

    • Repo with fetch/, extract/, analyze/, report/ modules; config.yaml for windows & filters; CI workflow to run end-to-end and publish CSVs + HTML report.
  • If this issue requires access to 311 data, please answer:

    • Not applicable. This project uses USAJOBS public APIs and public web archives only.

Activity

  1. moved this from New Issue Approval to Prioritized Backlog in CoP: Data Science: Project Boardon Sep 11, 2025
  2. added
    feature: missingthis tags is mutually exclusive with project: missing. Please use the correct label
    on Oct 9, 2025
  3. moved this from Prioritized Backlog to In progress (actively working) in CoP: Data Science: Project Boardon Oct 23, 2025
  4. 15 remaining items

  5. self-assigned this
    on Mar 17, 2026
  6. journeywoman commented on Mar 23, 2026

    @journeywoman

    Progress: Successfully queried the USAJOBS Occupational Series API to filter for IT-sector codes. Developed and executed a script to retrieve historical announcement data via the Historic JOA API for the specified timeframe.

    Blockers: None currently. Progress is slightly moderated by the learning curve of navigating public API schemas and managing unstructured data.

    Availability: 6–8 hours per week.

    ETA: 6-9 weeks.

    Next Steps: Parse the retrieved data and extract the necessary information.

  7. journeywoman commented on Mar 28, 2026

    @journeywoman

    Progress: Parsed the retrieved data. Started visualizing initial datasets.

    Blockers: None currently.

    Availability: 4–6 hours weekly (reduced due to school spring break). I’ll be away next week, so I won't be able to join the Zoom meeting next Monday.

    ETA: 6–8 weeks.

    Next Steps: Define AI-related keywords for filtering. Group data by month and year to track the percentage of job postings mentioning AI. Conduct a comparative analysis of average salaries for AI-related roles versus non-AI roles. Verify the hypothesis: AI-related roles should exhibit a higher "Starting Grade" (minimumGrade) compared to the baseline for the same PositionSeries.

    Preliminary Results:

    Image
    1. The Computer Science group (orange line) consistently commands the highest average salaries throughout the observed period. This trend is statistically significant and represents the premier compensation tier in federal IT.
    2. The IT Management category (red line) represents the highest volume of job postings. It exhibits a consistent and stable upward trajectory. This reflects a broad, reliable market demand for leadership roles, unaffected by sudden volatility and AI.
    3. Computer Engineering (blue line) and Data Science (green line) show very similar compensation patterns and growth rates. By 2025–2026, their average salaries nearly converge, suggesting that federal agencies value these distinct skill sets similarly in terms of pay grade.
    Image
    1. The IT Management category (red line) overwhelmingly dominates the federal landscape. Starting at over 18,120 postings in 2022, it maintains the highest volume throughout the period.
    2. While Computer Science offers the highest salaries (as seen in our previous chart), the demand is roughly 50–60% lower than for IT Management.
    3. The most likely reason for the sharp decline in 2025 and 2026 is not a sudden stop in hiring, but how USAJOBS historical data is indexed. Federal agencies often report "closed" positions to historical databases. Since 2025 has only recently concluded and we are currently in 2026, many thousands of positions are still "Open" or "In Review" and haven't been moved to the historical archives yet. It can take 6–12 months for the full volume of a year's job announcements to be reflected in the public data.
    Image
    1. The most dramatic feature of the chart is the sharp decline starting in January 2025, reaching a historic low in March 2025.
    2. There is a visible peak in September 2024 and a smaller recovery peak in September 2025. This can represent the end of the Federal Fiscal Year. Agencies often rush to open positions before their budget authority expires on September 30th.
    3. Data Science has almost completely flatlined since Feb 2025. This may indicate that new AI and Data Science initiatives are being paused or consolidated under new efficiency mandates (such as DOGE).
  8. journeywoman commented on Apr 13, 2026

    @journeywoman

    Progress: Completed research based on the Historic JOA API data. I am currently investigating methods to pull information from Greenhouse regarding IT roles.

    Blockers: None currently.

    Availability: 6 hours per week.

    ETA: 6–8 weeks.

    Next Steps:

    1. Compile a list of major IT/Tech Greenhouse tokens to seed the research.

    2. Extract a comprehensive list of all unique job titles.

    3. Filter and create a DataFrame of relevant roles.

    4. Develop a targeted script to fetch job descriptions for specific "Data" roles.

    5. Once the full_description column is populated, utilize NLP libraries (e.g., NLTK or spaCy) to extract required skills (Python, SQL, Power BI, etc.) and years of experience.

    Preliminary Results:

    Image The data reveals a clear divergence between total hiring volume and specialized demand. While total IT vacancies (grey bars) saw a significant decline in 2025, the AI market share (blue line) reached its highest historical levels. This indicates that federal agencies are shifting from broad-based hiring to a "quality-first" approach, prioritizing high-tech competencies over general IT support. A critical observation occurs in early 2025 (February–May). Despite a sharp drop in overall job announcements (n=190 to n=245), the relative share of AI-related roles spiked to a peak of 8.9% - 9.4%. AI and automation roles are remarkably resilient. Even during periods of hiring freezes or budgetary uncertainty, these positions remain a top strategic priority for the federal government. In late 2022, AI mentions were present in only 3.1% of IT job postings. By 2025 and early 2026, this "new baseline" has effectively doubled, stabilizing between 6.5% and 8.5%. Image Across almost all years (2022–2026) and job series, AI-related roles (blue bars) consistently exhibit a higher average starting GS grade compared to Standard IT roles (grey bars). This verifies the hypothesis that AI competencies are classified as expert-level requirements within the federal workforce. Image

    AI-related roles command significantly higher starting salaries than traditional IT positions within identical series. This indicates that federal agencies formally recognize AI expertise as a high-value, senior-level specialization, justifying a substantial increase in initial fiscal investment per hire.

  9. journeywoman commented on Apr 20, 2026

    @journeywoman

    Progress: Identified major IT/Tech Greenhouse tokens to initialize the research. Extracted a comprehensive list of all unique job titles and filtered them into a DataFrame of relevant roles. Developed and deployed a targeted script to fetch job descriptions for specific "Data" roles. Successfully extracted key variables including skills (Python, SQL, Power BI), years of experience, salary, country, degree requirements, and work flexibility. Implemented a function to normalize all salary data to USD for standardized analysis.

    Blockers: None currently.

    Availability: 6 hours per week.

    ETA: 6–8 weeks.

    Next Steps: I will continue scraping the data and extracting information from job descriptions for analysis. Additionally, I am researching labor market trends using data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Compare the ratio of junior-to-senior job postings over the last years to identify potential entry-level displacement. Correlate specific AI-complementary skills (e.g., "Agent Orchestration," "AI Governance") with salary bumps.

  10. journeywoman commented on Apr 27, 2026

    @journeywoman

    Current Progress

    1. Successfully pulled Reddit and Discord job postings for the 2022–2024 period via the Wayback Machine. The process is currently slow; I am investigating more efficient scraping alternatives to accelerate data acquisition.
    2. Researched the data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM). BLS employment projections for 2023–2033 suggest that AI is currently augmenting rather than replacing high-level IT roles. The demand for professionals to build, manage, and secure AI data pipelines is currently outstripping the efficiency gains offered by AI coding assistants (https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2025/ai-impacts-in-bls-employment-projections.htm#:~:text=of%20interactive%20chart.-,Employment%20projections%20for%20selected%20occupations%20susceptible%20to%20potential%20artificial%20intelligence).
    3. Found interesting external research from Anthropic regarding labor market impacts to serve as a benchmark for this study (https://www.anthropic.com/research/labor-market-impacts).

    Blockers
    There is a lack of available archive data from the Wayback Machine for 2025 and 2026. I am currently investigating the cause (e.g., changes in site crawlability or archival delays) and exploring alternative real-time scraping methods or API-based solutions to fill this gap.

    Availability: 6 hours per week.

    ETA: 6–8 weeks.

    Next Steps

    1. Investigate more efficient scraping alternatives to accelerate the collection process.

    2. Research the cause of missing archive data from the Wayback Machine for 2025 and 2026 (e.g., changes in site crawlability or archival delays) and explore alternative real-time scraping methods or API-based solutions to fill these gaps.

    3. Finalize data collection and begin the formal analysis.

  11. chinaexpert1 commented on May 12, 2026

    @chinaexpert1
    MemberAuthor

    Great work. I have more ideas for you in today's meeting.

  12. journeywoman commented on May 12, 2026

    @journeywoman

    Current Progress:
    I have audited data availability for 50 major tech companies. To date, I have successfully retrieved and processed data for 16 companies, including detailed extraction of skills, salaries, locations, and education requirements.

    Blockers:
    There is a total lack of data availability for the 2025 and 2026 calendar years via the Wayback Machine.

    Root Cause Analysis:
    The absence of recent data is attributed to several critical challenges currently facing the Internet Archive:

    Access Restrictions: Since late 2025, many major domains have implemented "hard blocks" against archive.org_bot to prevent unauthorized AI scraping.

    Infrastructure Issues: A confirmed technical breakdown in the Archive’s crawling systems (mid-2025) has significantly reduced snapshot frequency.

    Security & Legal Strain: Following a massive 2024 security breach and ongoing multi-million dollar litigation, the organization has diverted engineering resources away from crawler maintenance.

    Proposed Solutions:

    Direct Scraping: Pivot to scraping live job boards directly to capture real-time data. This will involve establishing a long-term monitoring window (6–12 months) to build a proprietary historical dataset.

    Alternative Repositories: Evaluate and integrate Common Crawl datasets to attempt to fill historical gaps where the Wayback Machine is insufficient.

    Availability: 6 hours per week.

  13. journeywoman commented on May 12, 2026

    @journeywoman

    It is a Wayback data.

    data_2022_to_2024.xls

    @chinaexpert1, please share your thoughts or any specific ideas you have. I’ll review them and incorporate them into the next steps. Thank you!

  14. journeywoman commented on Jun 9, 2026

    @journeywoman

    Progress: Checked a few hypotheses.
    Preliminary Results:

    Image
    1. IT Support & Operations shows a massive 22.6% requirement for general "AI", but exactly 0.0% for Machine Learning, Deep Learning, TensorFlow, or NLP. This proves these roles are rapidly adopting AI as an operational tool (likely leveraging LLMs to resolve tickets, draft communications, or automate workflows) without requiring the staff to understand the underlying math or architecture.

    2. Data & Analytics remains the epicenter of AI creation. It is the only category with a real footprint in heavy-compute model building, showing Deep Learning at 11.4% and visible, distinct requirements for specialized frameworks like TensorFlow (4.7%) and Keras (1.5%).

    3. Seeing 17.7% of Cybersecurity jobs ask for "AI" but only 3.8% ask for "Machine Learning" suggests a heavy reliance on automated, AI-driven threat detection software (like advanced endpoint protection). Companies want security analysts who can operate and interpret these AI tools, but they are generally buying them off-the-shelf rather than expecting their in-house security teams to code the models from scratch.

    4. With an Overall AI Penetration of 13.0% and an almost perfectly even split between general "AI" (8.1%) and "Machine Learning" (7.9%), Software Development & Engineering is sitting firmly in the integration phase. Traditional developers are increasingly being tasked with hooking up ML APIs and configuring existing models into web and mobile applications, bridging the gap between the data scientists and the end-users.

    Image
    1. Cloud & Infrastructure commands the highest premium at 95% (+$176k). The market is paying top dollar for engineers who can host, scale, and manage AI models (MLOps), not just write them.
    2. Data & Analytics sees a 91% (+$113k) bump. Traditional SQL/Tableau analysts hit a salary ceiling, while those with advanced machine learning skills jump into a completely different compensation tier.
    3. Software Engineering shows a 63% (+$105k) premium, driven by the need for developers who can integrate AI APIs (like LLMs) into actual products and applications.
    4. Even IT Support sees a 55% (+$53k) increase, proving that operating and troubleshooting AI-driven systems is becoming a highly paid specialization.
    5. IT Management sees only an 11% (+$24k) bump. Leadership salaries are already high, and their value remains tied to strategy and human management rather than hands-on AI execution.
    Image
    1. In core engineering, data science, and leadership roles, AI raises the barrier to entry by exactly 1 year. For these groups, companies do not see AI tools as a shortcut that allows junior employees to do senior work. Instead, they view AI as an advanced tier. You must first master traditional software engineering or data analysis before you are trusted to build, fine-tune, or integrate AI models.
    2. IT Support & Operations is the only category where AI successfully lowers the barrier to entry by 1 year, dropping from 3.0 down to 2.0 years.
    3. In Cybersecurity and Cloud & Infrastructure, the required experience remains flat at 5.0 years for both AI and non-AI roles.
      AI does not affect the labor market uniformly. For highly technical "producer" roles, AI acts as a ceiling that forces professionals to become more specialized and experienced. For operational "consumer" roles, AI acts as a floor, elevating junior workers and allowing them to enter the field with less prior experience.
    Image

    Data & Analytics already had the highest baseline for advanced degrees (11.3%), but adding AI pushes it even higher to 13.3%.

    Software Development also sees a slight bump (+1.0%), showing that companies view "AI Engineering" as a mathematically heavier discipline than standard software development, often requiring graduate-level computer science knowledge.

    For traditional roles like management or general cybersecurity, companies often use a Master's degree as a filtering mechanism. But for applied AI in these same fields, the technology is moving too fast for academia to keep up.

    Image Image

    General "AI" keyword demand went from a negligible baseline (under 5%) in 2022 to anchoring over 90% of job postings by late 2024. This is a direct corporate reaction to the mainstream launch of LLMs.

    Heavy-compute frameworks like TensorFlow and Keras completely flatlined at the bottom of the graph. Traditional deep-tech model architecture is staying isolated in niche research labs, while the broader IT market values deployment and automation.

    Image Image Image Image

    Availability & Next Steps: Unfortunately, I need to step away from this project because my main project is taking up all of my time right now. To hand things off properly, I'll package up all my notebooks and findings and upload them sometime this week.

  15. chinaexpert1 commented on Jun 9, 2026

    @chinaexpert1
    MemberAuthor

    This is great work. A few things:

    Your Wayback data is useful, but includes a lot of internatoinal jobs and I think we want to stay US focused for this report, or you will have scope creep on your analysis. Pleaase see if you can clean the data somehow easily. If not, we probably can't use the data set, unless you want to commit to a larger project that includes global figures. Also, categorizing the jobs would require similar code as cleaning it would.

    The AI skills analyis you are doing is very good. However, instead of Tensorflow, please look for Pytorch - it started to take over deep learning workflows a couple years ago.

    Your notes on "Barriers to Entry" don't match the chart. Please double check because these are important figures and I want you to include a section on it.

    The education wall is very good work. Be sure to note that Data Analytics has more people obtaining advanced degrees, but it is not being as highly compensated for them as your earlier work above shows.

    "Companion Skills" section good. Include.

    AI skills stuff good, see if you can do a chart for the cybersecurity sector too.

  16. journeywoman commented on Jun 15, 2026

    @journeywoman
  17. removed their assignment
    on Jun 22, 2026
  18. moved this from In progress (actively working) to Prioritized Backlog in CoP: Data Science: Project Boardon Aug 25, 2026
  19. Tyreal676 commented on Sep 29, 2026

    @Tyreal676
    Member

    Progress: Set up google's serpapi to scrape job postings related to data (engineering, scientist, analyst)
    Blockers: Not too much of a blocker, just working through the description to start getting skills and technologies for each job.
    Availability: 5 hours a week
    ETA: Unknown, project is probably going to be continuous/ongoing
    Pictures (if necessary):

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions