Repository navigation
Broken typings when upgrading to 21.4.0 #4547
Copy link
Copy link
Open
Labels
bugBug or defectBug or defect
Description
Runtime
node.js
Runtime version
22.15.1
Module version
21.4.0
Last module version without issue
21.3.12
Used with
No response
Any other relevant information
No response
What are you trying to achieve or the steps to reproduce?
We have handle who look simplified like this:
export const create = ():RouteOptions => ({
handler: async (req: Request<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; } }>, h: ResponseToolkit): Promise<ResponseObject> => {
const from = req.payload.from
const to = req.payload.to
.....
await someFunction(req);
return h.response().code(201);
},
});
export const someFunction = async (request: Request): Promise<void> => ({
.....
})
What was the result you got?
I get a typescript error:
error TS2345: Argument of type 'Request<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }>' is not assignable to parameter of type 'Request<ReqRefDefaults>'.
The types of 'route.settings.pre' are incompatible between these types.
Type 'RouteOptionsPreArray<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }> | undefined' is not assignable to type 'RouteOptionsPreArray<ReqRefDefaults> | undefined'.
Type 'RouteOptionsPreArray<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }>' is not assignable to type 'RouteOptionsPreAllOptions<ReqRefDefaults>[]'.
Type 'RouteOptionsPreAllOptions<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }>' is not assignable to type 'RouteOptionsPreAllOptions<ReqRefDefaults>'.
Type 'Method<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }, ReturnValue<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }>>' is not assignable to type 'RouteOptionsPreAllOptions<ReqRefDefaults>'.
Type 'Method<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }, ReturnValue<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }>>' is not assignable to type 'Method<ReqRefDefaults, ReturnValue<ReqRefDefaults>>'.
Types of parameters 'request' and 'request' are incompatible.
Type 'Request<ReqRefDefaults>' is not assignable to type 'Request<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; }; }>'.
Types of property 'payload' are incompatible.
Type 'string | object | Readable | Buffer<ArrayBufferLike>' is not assignable to type '{ from: string; to: string; }'.
Type 'string' is not assignable to type '{ from: string; to: string; }'.
To fix this problem I need to change:
export const someFunction = async (request: Request<{ Payload: { from: string; to: string; } }>): Promise<void> => ({
.....
})
but this does not work out if someFunction is used by different handler with different payloads.
What result did you expect?
keep it the way as in 21.3.12 an not have an error here.
Reactions are currently unavailable
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
bugBug or defectBug or defect
Activity
damusix commentedon May 21, 2025
@svrnwnsch you might want to try using generics instead.
someFunc = <R extends Request<any>> (req: R) => {...}so typescript matches any request type instead of a specific request type.svrnwnsch commentedon Jul 22, 2025
This works. I would still prefer that it worked as before and I do not need to use
anyas this is discouraged by our linter.damusix commentedon Aug 4, 2025
@svrnwnsch Yeah I completely understand. We try to also avoid
anyas much as possible, too. Do you have suggestions on how we might improve our typings?In short, what happens is the following:
By stating
async (request: Request) => any, you're telling TS: ThisRequestmatches the globalRequest<ReqRefDefaults>interface, instead of your strongly-typedRequest<{ payload: { ... } }>. TS can't match your specific payload to (stream.Readable | Buffer | string | object)[https://github.com/hapijs/hapi/blob/master/lib/types/request.d.ts#L270] since it doesn't extend any of those data types.By stating
someFunc = <R extends Request<any>> (req: R) => {...}, you're telling TS: infer R from Request (any ReqRefs).We're not using
Request<any>as a basis because we want to enforce strong types, so you have to state<any>in your generic type. If you're creating a utility that's a route config factory, this is appropriate. Perhaps try statingunknowninstead it would be more contractually correct? Try that and see if the linter still screams at you.It's also hard to tell how it was before for you, given that these typings have been this way for a while, and recent upgrades should not have affected anything except the Auth and HTTP method sections: https://github.com/hapijs/hapi/commits/master/lib/types/request.d.ts
damusix commentedon Feb 24, 2026
@svrnwnsch Can you try with the 21.4.5 release? LMK how it behaves given your use case.