You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2021. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 18, 2021. It is now read-only.
There's an API for converting an issue into a pull request. This is exposed in hub's pull-request subcommand. It would be aaaaawwwwweeeesssoooommmmeeee to have a web UI for this.
This is my personal number one feature request, hands down.
Thanks for sharing your feature request! We appreciate the feedback.
At GitHub, we prefer creating separate pull requests and then cross referencing the issue that it addresses. In the past, we've encountered problems when issues were turned into pull requests.
One simple example is when the pull request turns out to be the wrong solution and another pull request is more appropriate. In that case, it makes more sense for two separate pulls to both refer to the original issue.
Another example is when an issue's scope is bigger than just one pull request. In this case, several pulls can be created that refer back to the issue which each address different aspects of the overall issue.
Again, thanks for sharing. This has been on our minds and is something we're hoping to address in the future!
Activity
chadwhitacre commentedon Sep 6, 2013
Here's the command I used to get the API to work for badges/shields#57:
Here's some documentation for personal API tokens.
chadwhitacre commentedon Sep 6, 2013
I sent an email to support@github.com about this.
patcon commentedon Sep 6, 2013
Here's a workaround for now:
http://issue2pr.herokuapp.com/
Helpful to put it in your
contributing.mdchadwhitacre commentedon Sep 7, 2013
@patcon I had trouble with that today, due to the new two-factor auth implementation.
chadwhitacre commentedon Sep 7, 2013
@mtodd:
patcon commentedon Sep 7, 2013
Hm. That's unfortunate. Seems rather overbearing if that's the official rationale :/
EDIT: When you submit emails, do you also link to the issue that you've created in this repo?
chadwhitacre commentedon Sep 10, 2013
I couldn't get this working in hub (auth probs?) so I hacked this script: PRomote.sh.
patcon commentedon Sep 10, 2013
Nice. FYI,
hub --noop pull-requestreally helps debug when you're just getting used to using it.Also, might be relevant: mislav/hub#399
Lastly, here's the format for the config file if you want to create it manually:
patcon commentedon Sep 10, 2013
Oh hey, in case anyone missed it, there's talk of a make-do solution here:
steveklabnik/issue2pr#5
zbynekwinkler commentedon Sep 21, 2013
chadwhitacre commentedon Dec 11, 2013
I don't want this anymore. Do I close this ticket or leave it open for others who do?
patcon commentedon Dec 11, 2013
I've seen the sentiment elsewhere. Maybe leave it open?
patcon commentedon Jan 10, 2014
This is a huge bummer, but it looks like github is discussing whether to deprecate the issue->PR feature :/
mislav/hub@d6b7e1b
rlidwka commentedon Jan 14, 2014
Oh gosh, why am I finding out features only when they're about to be removed? :(