Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 14, 2024. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on May 14, 2024. It is now read-only.

Is this project still alive/maintained? #488

Closed

Description

@jgeurts

There are open pull requests with no activity from @joyent. Is this project still maintained? If it is active, I apologize. If not, can it be transferred to an organization with members that will be active?

Activity

  1. tastypackets commented on Aug 16, 2018

    @tastypackets

    It seems pretty dormant from the time I have been watching it on github. I think it might be time for someone to fork it.

  2. Artum commented on Aug 27, 2018

    @Artum

    Did you guys tried to contact the maintainer by email?

  3. jgeurts commented on Aug 27, 2018

    @jgeurts
    Author

    That's a good idea. I haven't tried, but I'll give it a shot!

  4. melloc commented on Aug 27, 2018

    @melloc
    Collaborator

    (Sorry, misread the URL earlier, and thought this was a different ticket. Posting new comment.)

    @jgeurts Sorry for the lack of activity lately. I'd planned on taking care of them earlier this year when I transferred the repo, but I've had other things come up, and haven't had the time to fix things correctly. I'm hoping to work my way through them soon. Is there a specific ticket you were looking at?

  5. jgeurts commented on Aug 27, 2018

    @jgeurts
    Author

    No worries, I definitely understand how things come up, just didn't want the project to become abandoned. I'm mainly interested in #485. That is preventing us from updating to node v10.

  6. purplemana commented on Oct 11, 2018

    @purplemana

    The pending PRs are still in wait. It'd be great to see the repo back in action.

  7. nytsua commented on Nov 5, 2018

    @nytsua

    @joyent Are you looking for people to help with PRs?

  8. jvanalst commented on Nov 5, 2018

    @jvanalst

    I'm with @jgeurts. As soon as #485 is fixed we're in business again. I think that should be the first priority.

  9. jgeurts commented on Nov 5, 2018

    @jgeurts
    Author

    I'm not convinced this project is active anymore, unfortunately.

    If anyone is interested, I have started working on the https://github.com/ldapts/ldapts project. The goal, aside from adding type information, is to modernize the syntax a bit and fix some outstanding issues.

    It's still very early in development (I'm working on Client first) and I welcome anyone who wants to lend a hand...

  10. tastypackets commented on Nov 6, 2018

    @tastypackets

    @jgeurts I'll be watching your progress, hopefully it will turn into a maintained alternative to ldapjs.

  11. acappella2017 commented on Nov 22, 2018

    @acappella2017
    Contributor

    @melloc

    Node.js starts LTS for V10 since Oct. 30, can we merge #485 to support Node 10?

  12. sunpeinju commented on Nov 28, 2018

    @sunpeinju

    @melloc

    Could you take a look at #497 ? Witch enables Node.js V10 support and all UTs have passed.

  13. sunpeinju commented on Nov 30, 2018

    @sunpeinju

    @joyent Could any body help to handle #497 ?
    ldapjs is broken with Node.js V10 and we want to bring it back to live.

  14. jgeurts commented on Dec 10, 2018

    @jgeurts
    Author

    If anyone needs node v10+ support, I've been using https://www.npmjs.com/package/ldapts for over a week to connect to a couple active directories with > 30k users. It has been working well and includes the fixes in #497.

  15. hcderaad commented on Feb 5, 2019

    @hcderaad

    For those looking for a lightweight LDAP server protocol implementation, perhaps this (pure) PHP library is an option worth considering: https://github.com/FreeDSx/LDAP/blob/master/docs/Server/General-Usage.md
    Besides that there is also a Go LDAP client/server implementation: glauth
    But for web developers the PHP switch might be a closer call.

  16. kspearrin commented on Mar 22, 2019

    @kspearrin

    2019 now and #485 still hasn't been fixed. Should we just move to ldapts?

  17. rienheuver commented on Jul 9, 2019

    @rienheuver

    @melloc has responded June 22 2019 here: nodejs/package-maintenance#221
    Currently at our work we are trying to make a choice for which library to use for our new project. We are building an auth-server in Node and need to also authenticate/authorize with LDAP-servers (Active Directory mostly). However, it's hard to pick a package that we can depend on for maintenance in the future. So hopefully the package will be transferred for maintenance

  18. UziTech commented on Aug 20, 2019

    @UziTech
    Member

    @jsumners since this repo moved to @ldapjs, are we going to see more active development?

    I have an active fork at UziTech/node-ldapjs that I have been merging some of the pull requests to.

    I have also been trying to update the codebase to use newer ES features and stable dependencies in https://github.com/UziTech/node-ldapjs/pull/2 available at @uzitech\ldapjs@next

    I would be happy to join the team and help get ldapjs back to actively maintained.

  19. jsumners commented on Aug 20, 2019

    @jsumners
    Member

    I didn’t realize it had been migrated. I never got an email or anything notifying me. Let me have some time to make sure we can publish things and get the lay of the land so to speak.

  20. melloc commented on Aug 20, 2019

    @melloc
    Collaborator

    @jsumners I've created an ldapjs organization on npm, and invited you to it. I've added the ldapjs package to the organization's developer team.

  21. jsumners commented on Aug 20, 2019

    @jsumners
    Member

    @melloc 👍

    I'll start looking into this stuff soon.

    At some point we may want to figure out website stuff, but I'll want to focus first on some package updates.

  22. jsumners commented on Aug 25, 2019

    @jsumners
    Member

    I did a little bit of work tonight merging some low hanging fruit PRs into a new next branch. It would be helpful if people could look through PRs and start some new ones to add unit tests to PRs that are likely abandoned and are missing tests.

    The priority should be getting the library working on current LTS and Node 12. Then an npm @next release can be published and a deprecation notice added to the current latest asking for people to test it out.

  23. jsumners commented on Aug 26, 2019

    @jsumners
    Member

    I'm closing this issue because it is basically resolved. A new release will come when it is ready.

  24. jsumners commented on Mar 10, 2023

    @jsumners
    Member

    ⚠️ This issue has been locked due to age. If you have encountered a recent
    problem that seems to be covered by this issue, please open a new issue.

    Please include a minimal reproducible example
    when opening a new issue.

  25. locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators on Mar 10, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions