fix(operate): version bump + factual corrections for PR #1637

[Simon J (simonjj)]

Fixes applied to PR #1637 (Container Apps Operate)

5 corrections across 3 files:

SKILL.md

• Version bump 1.1.8 → 1.1.9

networking.md

1. IP restriction mixing — removed incorrect warning that Allow and Deny rules cannot be mixed; they CAN and are evaluated by priority
2. Subnet delegation — corrected to show \Microsoft.App/environments\ delegation is required for BOTH workload-profiles AND consumption-only environments
3. Fully-private topology — split into two sub-modes (VNet-wide vs env-only) for accuracy

revisions.md

4. First-deployment tip — clarified that the first deployment creates the initial revision automatically

Model-Matrix Test Results — 15/15 PASS

Model	Cosmos RBAC	KEDA Identity	KQL+Redis
GPT-5 mini	✅	✅	✅
GPT-5.3-Codex	✅	✅	✅
Claude Haiku 4.5	✅	✅	✅
Claude Sonnet 4.6	✅	✅	✅
Claude Opus 4.6	✅	✅	✅

Co-authored-by: Copilot 223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Updates the azure-prepare skill’s Container Apps “operate” reference docs with factual corrections and bumps the skill version to reflect the change set.

Changes:

• Bumped azure-prepare skill version 1.1.8 → 1.1.9.
• Corrected Container Apps networking guidance (subnet delegation, IP restriction behavior, and clarified fully-private topology modes).
• Clarified revisions guidance for first deployment behavior.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
plugin/skills/azure-prepare/SKILL.md	Patch version bump to reflect reference updates.
plugin/skills/azure-prepare/references/services/container-apps/networking.md	Corrected/clarified VNet delegation, IP restriction evaluation, and fully-private topology rows.
plugin/skills/azure-prepare/references/services/container-apps/revisions.md	Clarified first-deployment revision tip wording.

[Paul Yuknewicz (paulyuk)]

Thanks Simon — merging this! Subnet delegation fix and the fully-private topology split are spot on.

One heads-up: JonG flagged that the priority field on ipSecurityRestrictions doesn't exist in the Container Apps API (2024-03-01) — rules are evaluated in array order, not by priority. Your warning text update references priority-based evaluation, so I'll adjust that in a follow-up commit along with removing the priority: 100/200 fields from the Bicep snippet.

Remaining JonG items (8 total) I'll fix directly on the branch after merge.