You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2026. It is now read-only.
Proposal: Migrate reactxp's trunk branch from master to main #1221
We've adopted this in my company for most active repos (some holdouts remain but are currently planned to move eventually), and I personally have adopted this in several open source projects.
There was effort involved in changing the CI tooling, but using main allows engineer's auto-complete muscle memory to keep working, so we found no significant issues.
Just since I have your ear here, can you list out the exact steps that implement this? I'd changed some other projects to allow/deny but haven't changed git branch terms, and I have other repos I'm interested in regardless of how the proposal goes here
For this specific proposal, I doubt it's a voting thing but I like the change. Technically a non-event but positive on a personal level.
Github has announced that they're working on processes and tools to help automate this conversion. I think we should wait a little bit longer for the tools and guidance to be published. I agree with the sentiment though, and I fully support this.
Activity
mikehardy commentedon Jul 22, 2020
Just since I have your ear here, can you list out the exact steps that implement this? I'd changed some other projects to allow/deny but haven't changed git branch terms, and I have other repos I'm interested in regardless of how the proposal goes here
For this specific proposal, I doubt it's a voting thing but I like the change. Technically a non-event but positive on a personal level.
erictraut commentedon Jul 22, 2020
Github has announced that they're working on processes and tools to help automate this conversion. I think we should wait a little bit longer for the tools and guidance to be published. I agree with the sentiment though, and I fully support this.
fbartho commentedon Jul 22, 2020
Mike Hardy (@mikehardy) -- the steps I followed was:
master-- ideally all your CI code is checked into the repo, but you may need to edit files somewhere else.git branch -m master mainmainmasterif you have no open PRs that you can't adjustfbartho commentedon Jul 22, 2020
Super timely announcement right after I posted this proposal: https://github.blog/changelog/2020-07-22-github-actions-better-support-for-alternative-default-branch-names/
fbartho commentedon Jul 22, 2020
https://github.com/github/renaming/