You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 16, 2022. It is now read-only.
We need a process to evaluate and accept new badge and pathway proposals. I recommend we use an RFC-like process for new additions. Every new badge or pathway proposal will be submitted as a PR to add a new file to the @nodejs/open-badges repo by filling out a template markdown file with the required information. Discussion will happen on the PR and when consensus is reached by the Open Badges Team, the PR will be merged
Outstanding questions:
What information do we need in the RFC template?
Do we require a final design before merging the PR? If no, what is the design process?
Does the larger Community Committee want final say on badge approval?
What is the process for modifying badge designs / criteria?
Is there a better format / process for proposing new Badges?
I welcome anyone to take a stab at a first draft and opening a PR for further discussion.
Activity
amiller-gh commentedon Mar 13, 2018
Good example of a modern RFC repo: https://github.com/emberjs/rfcs
maddhruv commentedon Mar 14, 2018
I feel we should collect pieces of information regarding -
maddhruv commentedon Mar 14, 2018
Yeah, we can set up some design principles with a designing badge so that we can follow up a standard throughout the scenario.
Taking up a final decision before merging or approving a PR should be appreciated.