Skip to content

Do we want a logo? #529

Closed
Closed

Description

@jbergstroem

artboard 1 2x

Just did this for reasons I'm still not sure about. Do we even want or need a logo? I imagine printing stickers and putting them on my toaster which hopefully will run jenkins in a near future.

Edit: database icon -> shovel (poorly outlined by me).
Edit2: Shovel upgrade! Made from scratch (needs work though; scales awfully)

Activity

  1. mhdawson commented on Nov 10, 2016

    @mhdawson
    Member

    I think it would be cool to have some stickers :) We'd probably have to get the ok from somebody in the foundation for the design.

  2. gibfahn commented on Nov 11, 2016

    @gibfahn
    Member

    I can't say we need this, but definitely want that sticker.

    <bikeshedAlert>Maybe less text? Something like Node.js Build WG?</bikeshedAlert>

  3. MylesBorins commented on Nov 11, 2016

    @MylesBorins
    Contributor

    I'd be into something super minimal... something we can put on a hex sticker. What about just the gears or the shovel?

  4. jbergstroem commented on Nov 11, 2016

    @jbergstroem
    MemberAuthor

    @gibfahn we could always make the text optional if stickers would be a reality. I just saw the symbol/text as a way to consolidate a readme/etc.

  5. jbergstroem commented on Nov 11, 2016

    @jbergstroem
    MemberAuthor

    I'll prepare a hex shovel, the symbol and the text for use if we end up doing it!

  6. bnb commented on Nov 14, 2016

    @bnb

    Love this idea! Would be super fun to start getting NodeSchool-esque logos for each WG. They have a HexDex with all the logos - maybe the Org could do something similar, starting with the Build WG?

  7. jbergstroem commented on Nov 14, 2016

    @jbergstroem
    MemberAuthor

    Well, our shovel aint got shit on those hexdex:es -- I'll see what I can do :)

  8. rvagg commented on Nov 19, 2016

    @rvagg
    Member

    @jbergstroem get us a hex ASAP and I'll get some printed before Node Interactive, I have some other hexes to print as well so may as well do it at the same time. Vector would be nice of course.

  9. MylesBorins commented on Nov 19, 2016

    @MylesBorins
    Contributor

    @jbergstroem I've made some hexes before so let me know if you want some support

    edit: sticker spec for reference https://github.com/terinjokes/StickerConstructorSpec

  10. jbergstroem commented on Nov 19, 2016

    @jbergstroem
    MemberAuthor

    @thealphanerd no issues with dimensions; bigger issues with skill.

  11. jbergstroem commented on Nov 22, 2016

    @jbergstroem
    MemberAuthor

    wip.pdf

    Here's the PDF is someone wants to chip in.

  12. mikeal commented on Dec 5, 2016

    @mikeal
    Contributor

    Can someone send an email to the trademark alias to get this approved as derivative :)

  13. mhdawson commented on Jul 20, 2017

    @mhdawson
    Member

    A good opportunity to print them https://www.stickermule.com/ca/p/831c7240 $19 US

  14. maclover7 commented on Feb 13, 2018

    @maclover7
    Contributor

    ping -- should this stay open?

  15. bnb commented on Feb 13, 2018

    @bnb

    @maclover7 this issue has been referenced in discussion around nodejs/community-committee#212 - I don't think it needs to stay open for that discussion to move forward, but just a heads up 😊

  16. gibfahn commented on Feb 13, 2018

    @gibfahn
    Member

    ping -- should this stay open?

    What do you think? My view is that having a logo would be good, so it should stay open until we actually have one. But maybe we don't need one (in which case we should agree that and close it).

    Maybe this should be on the wg-agenda for the next meeting if it's been forgotten. Probably needs a champion though (someone to work out next steps).

  17. gdams commented on Aug 27, 2018

    @gdams
    Member

    I'm going to try and re kindle the fire on this issue. I personally feel that having our own logo would be a great idea and as @mhdawson has mentioned, it would also be a good opportunity to create stickers which the WG members could have. It ties in nicely with some of the other discussions about how to raise awareness of the build WG and how to give them more recognition in the foundation.

  18. mhdawson commented on Aug 28, 2018

    @mhdawson
    Member

    I've mentioned it as a possible first one for the https://github.com/nodejs/badges initiative. Having said that I think I could just ask for approval for the logo suggested originally if we all agree its good.

  19. Trott commented on Apr 24, 2019

    @Trott
    Member

    Anyone who wants should feel free to pursue this, but I don't think we need this as an open issue in the tracker at this time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions