You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@cclauss I got gyp-next, so we're good there. IDK if we need gyp tbqh, but we can talk to Chromium Authors for a handoff (they'd probably be happy to). Do you both agree we should proceed?
Activity
targos commentedon Mar 15, 2020
"gyp-next" is not taken. can we close this issue?
cclauss commentedon Mar 15, 2020
It would be cool to get
gypgiven that it is not being used. But also let’s grab ˋgyp-next` before someone squats on it.ryzokuken commentedon Mar 15, 2020
@cclauss I got gyp-next, so we're good there. IDK if we need gyp tbqh, but we can talk to Chromium Authors for a handoff (they'd probably be happy to). Do you both agree we should proceed?
cclauss commentedon Mar 15, 2020
I believe that we should grab both. Otherwise we are going to have to answer the same support questions over and over again.
legendecas commentedon May 9, 2024
We have been using gyp-next for a while. Should we continue to seek gyp on pypi? If not, maybe we can close this.
ryzokuken commentedon May 9, 2024
I don't think it's going to be worth the effort.
cclauss commentedon May 9, 2024
If you can get the owners and/or PyPI to give us that domain, then we will take it.