Skip to content

Node.js Loaders Team Meeting 2022-08-02 #105

Closed

Description

@mhdawson

Time

UTC Tue 02-Aug-2022 18:00 (06:00 PM):

Timezone Date/Time
US / Pacific Tue 02-Aug-2022 11:00 (11:00 AM)
US / Mountain Tue 02-Aug-2022 12:00 (12:00 PM)
US / Central Tue 02-Aug-2022 13:00 (01:00 PM)
US / Eastern Tue 02-Aug-2022 14:00 (02:00 PM)
EU / Western Tue 02-Aug-2022 19:00 (07:00 PM)
EU / Central Tue 02-Aug-2022 20:00 (08:00 PM)
EU / Eastern Tue 02-Aug-2022 21:00 (09:00 PM)
Moscow Tue 02-Aug-2022 21:00 (09:00 PM)
Chennai Tue 02-Aug-2022 23:30 (11:30 PM)
Hangzhou Wed 03-Aug-2022 02:00 (02:00 AM)
Tokyo Wed 03-Aug-2022 03:00 (03:00 AM)
Sydney Wed 03-Aug-2022 04:00 (04:00 AM)

Or in your local time:

Links

Agenda

Extracted from loaders-agenda labelled issues and pull requests from the nodejs org prior to the meeting.

nodejs/loaders

  • Proposal: Rename “loaders” to “hooks” #95

Invited

  • Loaders team: @nodejs/loaders

Observers/Guests

Notes

The agenda comes from issues labelled with loaders-agenda across all of the repositories in the nodejs org. Please label any additional issues that should be on the agenda before the meeting starts.

Joining the meeting

Activity

  1. self-assigned this
    on Jul 29, 2022
  2. GeoffreyBooth commented on Jul 29, 2022

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    I'd like to bring the "what to name the team/flag/feature" discussion to a conclusion at this meeting if possible. @aduh95 @JakobJingleheimer

  3. JakobJingleheimer commented on Jul 29, 2022

    @JakobJingleheimer
    Member

    Sorry I can't attend this one (it's my partner's birthday).

    I'm in favour of "Customization API" (despite the incorrect spelling) and related nomenclature.

  4. GeoffreyBooth commented on Jul 29, 2022

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    (despite the incorrect spelling)

    Sorry, that’s just the project style: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/main/doc/README.md#:~:text=test%2Ddoc.-,Use%20US%20spelling,-.

  5. GeoffreyBooth commented on Jul 29, 2022

    @GeoffreyBooth
    Member

    I’m in favour of “Customization API” (despite the incorrect spelling) and related nomenclature.

    See #95 (comment). If that comment gets enough votes maybe we can skip this meeting.

  6. JakobJingleheimer commented on Jul 29, 2022

    @JakobJingleheimer
    Member

    Ah, yes. That's what I was referring to above. (Works for me, and i voted)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions