Skip to content

Branding Release Channels #2216

Closed
Closed

Description

@mikeal

We have a number of builds that we want to be consumed by different audiences and we need to find a way to message those channels and a strategy for promoting them to the correct audience.

This topic is descendent from the big release process issue: #1997

  • Lastest LTS
  • Supported LTS
  • Maintenance Mode LTS (Is this the right term?)
  • Incubating Master (we need to start incubating master releases before promoting for wider consumption)
  • Incubated Master (Previously referred to as "stable" or "current" master, basically the latest master build that passed incubation)
  • Latest next release.

Obviously we won't feature all of these on the front page and we may have different strategies for promoting them on twitter, that's one of the things we need to figure out along with the branding.

Pinging relevant working groups:
@nodejs/website
@nodejs/evangelism
I'll also make sure the Marketing Committee at the foundation lends their expertise.

Activity

  1. added
    metaIssues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
    on Jul 21, 2015
  2. Fishrock123 commented on Aug 25, 2015

    @Fishrock123
    Contributor

    @mikeal did we figure this out ever?

    As far as I know things now sit like this:

    • next / dev (master)
    • stable
    • LTS
    • maintenance

    Maybe we should still discuss what master releases should be called?

  3. mikeal commented on Aug 25, 2015

    @mikeal
    ContributorAuthor

    Nope! Let's put this on the back burner until the new website is up. Right
    now let's just refer to releases by their number. Once we have a bunch of
    these live my suggestion would be to reach out to the foundation's
    marketing committee to get their input as branding isn't our core
    competency :)

    On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 9:39 AM, Jeremiah Senkpiel <notifications@github.com

    wrote:

    @mikeal https://github.com/mikeal did we figure this out ever?

    As far as I know things now sit like this:

    • next / dev (master)
    • stable
    • LTS
    • maintenance

    Maybe we should still discuss what master releases should be called?

    —
    Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
    #2216 (comment).

  4. Fishrock123 commented on Oct 7, 2015

    @Fishrock123
    Contributor
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    metaIssues and PRs related to the general management of the project.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions