Repository navigation
Team membership audit #635
Description
Hey folks, what do you think about auditing our members to remove those who have been inactive and to see if they still want to remain in this group?
If I don’t receive any objections within a week, I’ll make the list. It would follow the same methodology that was used back in 2022: 30 days to express whether they want to stay or not.
cc: @nodejs/package-maintenance
Activity
wesleytodd commentedon Aug 22, 2025
cc: @BethGriggs @dominykas @ghinks @ljharb @Eomm @mhdawson
@darcyclarke and I were chatting about the future of this group recently, and as the admin members I think we should couple this effort with having a meeting to restructure the governance with the goal of unblocking progress despite inactivity. Do folks like this idea? Obviously we could just do this separately, but without having a way for folks like @bjohansebas to admin things it has meant a bunch of back and forth.
bjohansebas commentedon Aug 28, 2025
Ref: #636
dominykas commentedon Aug 29, 2025
I'm OK with not being admin anymore, although I do intend to keep the pkgjs/action alive.
bjohansebas commentedon Oct 11, 2025
#639
bjohansebas commentedon Oct 25, 2025
Change at the GitHub team level nodejs/admin#1020