You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
spec: widen the #8778 scope-pin annotation on the audit-stamping declaration to name the cloud#1395 ruling and its three sanctioned consumers #10110
Carved by the triage seat (session session_012XVwvSDo9v5TFLgc8hFfLC, round of ~03:3xZ 2026-08-20) as the contract-first first slice of #10101. Reader: #10101 is pm:blocked on this card and the domain:services seat dispatches it only after this lands.
What this card is
packages/spec/src/data/object.zod.ts carries an explicit scope pin from the #8778 ruling:
Scope-pinned by the #8778 ruling: this is ONE stamp-only declaration key, not the opening move of a general field-roles mechanism — a consumer other than audit stamping needs its own ruling before reading it.
The maintainer ruling recorded on cloud#1395 (2026-08-17T03:18Z, accepting the recommendation in full — 「新进卡六张 同意你的建议」) widens that pin by name:
Scope pin change: the #8778 scope pin … is widened by this ruling — the annotation next to it must name this ruling and the three sanctioned consumers, so the widening is declared, not discovered. That slice routes to the spec seat.
Deliverable: update the pin annotation to name (1) the cloud#1395 ruling and date, (2) the three sanctioned consumers — audit stamping, plugin-approvals, and the automation-run recorder (resolveRecordOrganizationField promoted to the shared platform-row resolver). Keep the refusal posture for any fourth consumer.
The path arm of the clause-② gate will still fire on the PR (it touches packages/spec/src/**) — that is expected and correct; the review confirms the diff is annotation-only.
Size/model suggestion: S, standard spec text-face tier.
Refs: #10101 (the blocked implementation card) · cloud#1395 (the ruling record) · PR #9132 (the landed unambiguous half) · #8778 / #8287 (the pin and its original ruling).
Contract review — PASS, needs:contract-review cleared (triage seat, contract-review tier claude-fable-5 per CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, session session_01JTMsq2Gv3qDWMcGWKi6Sb8; not the dispatching seat).
Reviewed PR #10168's actual diff (head 4b3b6dbb9): pure JSDoc/comment insertion in object.zod.ts plus comment-prose in two test files — zero schema shape or accept/reject change; the cloud#1395 ruling is transcribed with the three sanctioned consumers named and the fourth-consumer refusal posture restated verbatim. Content limb no confirmed. Card may enqueue per the lane seat's normal landing flow.
Activity
os-zhuang commentedon Aug 20, 2026
Contract review — PASS,
needs:contract-reviewcleared (triage seat, contract-review tierclaude-fable-5perCONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, sessionsession_01JTMsq2Gv3qDWMcGWKi6Sb8; not the dispatching seat).Reviewed PR #10168's actual diff (head
4b3b6dbb9): pure JSDoc/comment insertion inobject.zod.tsplus comment-prose in two test files — zero schema shape or accept/reject change; the cloud#1395 ruling is transcribed with the three sanctioned consumers named and the fourth-consumer refusal posture restated verbatim. Content limbnoconfirmed. Card may enqueue per the lane seat's normal landing flow.Generated by Claude Code