Repository navigation
Build agent creates a kanban grouped by a field it just added without disclosing that every existing record will be invisible on the board — extend the honest-disclosure contract (the rollup/backfill precedent) to the view face #13693
Description
Provenance: split from objectstack-ai/cloud#1818 (filed by the maintainer from the two-plane rig, pins 8c82289/7a5da141, scenario battle R7) by the repo:cloud execution seat (objectstack#6026, session session_01EzWYDkwr6WEwDGhMH1Jzuq, R30). This is the builder-side half; the view-side half (kanban fallback lane) is #13692 (repo:objectui). The two are independent — either landing alone improves the outcome, both landing is the full fix.
Measured behavior
In battle R7 the build agent added a 「客户等级」(A/B/C) select field to an existing customer table AND created a kanban grouped by it, in one request. Both artifacts were built correctly — but the resulting board renders "no cards" in all three lanes while its footer counts the 20 existing records, because a newly added group field has no values on existing rows and the kanban has no fallback lane.
The ask
When the build agent creates a view grouped by a field that (a) it created in the same request, or (b) measurably has no values on existing records, it should proactively disclose: existing records will not appear on this board until the field is filled (and offer the obvious follow-ups — backfill, or a fallback lane once the view supports one). The maintainer's source card names the precedent explicitly (untranslated):
对比同一战役 R10 的教训(rollup 无 backfill 必须诚实披露),这里是同一根因的视图面
i.e. this extends the already-ruled honest-disclosure posture (a declared capability whose day-one behavior surprises the operator must say so at creation time) from computed fields to views. Landing surface is the build/blueprint side (service-ai / the blueprint generator's disclosure path) — triage to confirm the exact seam.
Repro: run-stack → battle R1 builds the CRM → R7 adds the field + kanban → open the customer-grade board.
Activity
os-warren commentedon Aug 31, 2026
Triage: lands in
cloud(packages/service-ai-studio/, thebuildagent) — NOT in this repo.pm:queue+repo:cloud, typeTask. Reader: therepo:cloudexecution seat (#6026), which consumeslabel:repo:cloud+pm:queuefrom this repo.origin/main(75b3bdc):service-aianywhere in objectstackservice-ai-studioanywhere in objectstackpackages/services/service-analytics/Zero-hit is only a reading because the control hit. The two AI agent packages are both absent from this repo.
Where the
buildagent actually lives, per this repo's own audit (docs/audits/2026-06-ask-build-agent-development-assessment.md:29):(and
:16puts theaskagent at OSSpackages/services/service-ai/— a path that no longer exists here either, so that line is itself stale. Not this card's problem; noted so the next reader does not trust it.)⇒ By the file-at-destination criterion (strip objectstack out and does the card still stand? — it does; nothing in the ask touches this repo), this is a cloud card, not a seam card. It keeps the established
repo:cloud-in-objectstack form that the cloud seat already consumes, rather than a transfer, to stay consistent with its ~10 sibling cards and with #13692 (therepo:objectuihalf of the same split).Type rationale (mechanical boundary test): does not violate a declared contract — the honest-disclosure posture is ruled for the rollup/backfill face and the card explicitly asks to extend it to the view face; and it does not widen an accept set or a public surface. Residual ⇒
Task. If the executing seat reads the ruled posture as already binding on views (i.e. declared≠enforced ⇒Bug), raise it withpm:retriagerather than relabelling.⛔ No
domain:*: single-lane repo — therepo:*label is the routing, per the multi-repo split.Generated by Claude Code
baozhoutao commentedon Aug 31, 2026
Framing correction (repo:cloud seat, session
session_01EzWYDkwr6WEwDGhMH1Jzuq, R31), from the maintainer's re-verification on the source card (objectstack-ai/cloud#1818, 2026-08-31 13:30Z): the kanban fallback lane EXISTS (objectui#2792 — trailingKANBAN_UNCOLUMNED_IDlane, i18nkanban.uncategorized, DOM measured["A","B","C","未分类"]on the rig). The sibling card #13692 is retracted as premise-false.This card still stands — the maintainer's correction says so explicitly (「生成器侧的诚实披露(原方向 2,仍成立)」) — but the disclosure wording this card asks for changes:
Generated by Claude Code
baozhoutao commentedon Aug 31, 2026
Seam correction (repo:cloud seat, session
session_01EzWYDkwr6WEwDGhMH1Jzuq, R31): the disclosure's actual landing surface turned out to be the cloud repo'spackages/service-ai-studio(blueprint tools), not this repo — and the maintainer has implemented it directly: objectstack-ai/cloud#1821 ("a board over a just-created group field must disclose the 未分类 lane"), which also records the corrected framing (fallback lane exists; renderer is not at fault; generator-side disclosure only). This card will be closed as implemented-elsewhere once that PR merges; if it doesn't land, this card stands as the tracking anchor.Generated by Claude Code
baozhoutao commentedon Aug 31, 2026
Closing as implemented elsewhere (repo:cloud seat, session
session_01EzWYDkwr6WEwDGhMH1Jzuq, R31): the maintainer's objectstack-ai/cloud#1821 MERGED 2026-08-31 14:47Z, delivering the generator-side disclosure at the real seam (cloud'spackages/service-ai-studioblueprint tools) with the corrected framing this card's comment recorded. Nothing remains for this repo. Provenance chain: cloud#1818 (measurement) → correction on that card → cloud#1821 (fix, merged).Generated by Claude Code