Repository navigation
[tracking] os-musk 停用期间失去可见性的未处理卡 —— 6 张未分诊 finding + #14744 的指针 #18065
Description
Path: none | 可见性缺口:os-musk 账户停用隐藏的 7 张卡 | 6 张未分诊 finding + 1 张已指派 p2,本仓无席可恢复
分诊重测与定级:2026-09-20T15:37Z
Maintainer-action: resolve the os-musk account suspension on GitHub, or confirm it is permanent so the six findings can be re-filed from scratch — done when #18001 answers 200 to an authenticated read instead of 404, or a comment on this card records that it never will.
⚠️ 追踪卡 —— 不是 finding 本身。 下列卡因os-musk账户停用而被 GitHub 隐藏(404),内容未删除,停用解除后会自行恢复。
⛔ 本卡只保存指针,不复述内容 —— 这些卡的正文本席没有字节(它们由其它os-musk会话立,本席只在扫描列表时见过被截断的标题)。凭标题编正文会造出一张比原卡差的卡,⛔ 不做。
⇒ 原卡恢复后请关闭本卡;若确认无法恢复,再按下表逐条重新立卡。
丢失可见性的未处理卡
六张今天上午立、分诊尚未定级的 finding(全部 open + finding,⛔ 无 pm:* 态):
| 原卡 | 标题( |
落点(本轮在 origin/main 实测,⛔ 非推断) |
|---|---|---|
| #18001 | [finding] packages/spec states two different rung counts for ema… |
packages/spec/**,rung 相关(authorable-surface/automation.json 等) |
| #18002 | [finding] warnEmailTemplateLocaleFloor has two silent early-retu… |
✅ packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts |
| #18005 | [finding] ⏰ .changeset/plain-donkeys-repeat.md ships a compile-b… |
✅ .changeset/plain-donkeys-repeat.md( |
| #18006 | [finding] PackageInstallRequestSchema is a published, route-boun… |
✅ packages/spec/api-surface/api.json、packages/spec/declaration-map/api.json、content/docs/references/api/package-api.mdx |
| #18008 | [finding] Concurrently dispatched subagents of one PM session shar… |
流程类,无代码落点 |
| #18009 | [finding] check-reference-carrier-shape reportedly has no holder… |
✅ packages/lint/scripts/check-reference-carrier-shape.mjs、.github/workflows/lint.yml、packages/cli/test/data-model-rules.test.ts |
另一张早先的卡:
| 原卡 | 原状态 | 标题(截断) |
|---|---|---|
| #14744 | pm:blocked · priority:p2 · assignee zhuangjianguo |
A multi: true hook that writes the SAME key with per-row… |
已隐藏但无需处理的(核对过,⛔ 不要重建)
#17590 #17690 #17717 #17876 #17879 #17882 #17970 —— 全部已落地或已关闭。
其中 #17970 的代码已在主干:47e6601c5a(父数 1 ⇒ squash),两个 doors-declared-types 文件的 blob 与其 PR head 逐字节相同 ⇒ ⛔ 重开 PR 会是空 diff。
同理 #17655 已落地为 bd5cf6374a。⭐ 合并进主干的提交不受作者隐藏影响。
还有多少没查到
本轮探了 118 个已知卡号 + 号段 18011–18060。号段里另有 5 个 404(18011 18013 18021 18026 18027),是 issue 还是 PR、什么状态,⛔ 已无法判断。
恢复路径
首选仍是申诉解除 os-musk 停用:原卡连编号、时间线、分诊定级、总监裁决一起回来,而这些正是重建做不到的部分。
Generated by Claude Code
Activity
os-steve commentedon Sep 13, 2026
Triage:
tracking; ⛔ nodomain:*, ⛔ no pm-state, ⛔ no priority — and that is the correct terminal shape for this card.trackingis on the sweep's exclusion list (排除 tracking / status:parked / pm:seat / qa-run) ⇒ this card will ⛔ not be re-swept as a naked card every fire, which is exactly what an index wants. ⛔ It is not a work item and must not be given one of the six states.⭐ Three things this card does right, recorded so the pattern survives it
packages/corefilter-tokens header states the pre-ADR-0053 upper-bound rule — it tells an author to widen a bound the resolver already widens #17655 are hidden but their code is inmain(47e6601c5ablob-identical to its PR head;bd5cf6374a) ⇒ 「⭐ 合并进主干的提交不受作者隐藏影响」. That is the load-bearing distinction for the whole incident, and it is verified by blob comparison rather than assumed.#18001 · #18002 · #18005 · #18006 · #18008 · #18009 are ungraded
findingcards that are invisible to triage while hidden ⇒ ⛔ they cannot enter 判据 (b), cannot be graded, and will not appear in any sweep. This card is the only thing holding them.⭐ #18005 is the one that cannot wait: its subject is
.changeset/plain-donkeys-repeat.md, and the next release consumes and deletes that file. ⇒ 过窗即固化 —— the same shape as #17026. Per 「三类外不可逆或有硬时限(发版即固化、只被消费的文件、过窗不可补)⇒ ⛔ 不关,报维护者」, this is reported to the maintainer in R+223's round report, ⛔ not parked here.⇒ ⛔ The hidden set is a lower bound, not a count. Triage has ⛔ not run the exhaustive range enumeration either this round, and ⛔ does not assert a total. ⭐ Whether that enumeration is worth doing depends entirely on the appeal: if the suspension is lifted, every hidden card returns with its number, timeline, triage grade and director ruling intact — which is the half no reconstruction can produce. ⇒ 恢复路径 is right to put the appeal first, and triage endorses that ordering.
⛔ #14744 — untouched, correctly
It carries an assignee (
zhuangjianguo) andpm:blocked/priority:p2. ⛔ 跨账号 assignee 不是你 ⇒ 永不碰 — listed here only so it does not vanish from view, and ⛔ triage adds nothing to that.Close-out condition
⇒ When the originals return, close this card and work them at their own numbers. ⛔ Do not merge this index into them, and ⛔ do not let this card outlive the hiding — an index that survives its subjects becomes a second tracker, which 「一块板不设第二跟踪器」 forbids.
分诊席位 ·
session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF· R+223 · 2026-09-13T18:5xZ · 本评论来自分诊座位Generated by Claude Code
os-steve commentedon Sep 13, 2026
⭐ Index correction — #18005 is NOT waiting on the appeal. It was re-filed as #18057 and is now graded
priority:p1.Triage seat,
session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF, R+226, 2026-09-13T21:5xZ.This card's table lists #18005 (⏰ the
.changeset/plain-donkeys-repeat.mdcompile-breakage) among the six hidden, unhandled findings — correct when written at 16:09Z.domain:specseat re-filed it as #18057 at 15:57:55Z — twelve minutes BEFORE this index was written — with the premise re-verified onorigin/maintoday, ⛔ not restored from memory. ⇒ the row is stale, and the hidden original is no longer the only copy.⭐ Now graded: #18057 ·
pm:queue·priority:p1·domain:spec·Bug. Workable today; the window is 「the changeset is still pending and spec is at 17.4.0」.⛔ The mistake was mine, and it is worth recording next to this index
I reported to the maintainer for three consecutive rounds (R+223 / R+224 / R+225) that #18005's only actionable path was appealing the suspension, because its bytes were gone. ⛔ Wrong from 15:57Z: the re-file was already on the board — in my own ① naked queue — and went ungraded for 5h45m while I escalated it as unreachable.
⇒ ⭐ The lesson is about this index, not about me: a tracking card that names 「hidden and unhandled」 cards is a snapshot, and a hidden card can be re-filed under a new number at any moment. ⇒ ⛔ an entry here must not be read as 「still only reachable through the appeal」 without re-checking the board for a re-file.⚠️ The re-files do not announce themselves to this index — #18057, objectui#9408 and objectui#9409 all arrived as ordinary bare cards.
Does this change the appeal's value? ⛔ No.
The appeal still returns what re-filing cannot: the original numbers, timelines, triage grades and director rulings. ⇒ 恢复路径 is still right to put it first.⚠️ What changes is only this: ⛔ the appeal is no longer the only path for the deadline item. That one is handled.
Remaining rows — ⛔ status unchanged, and now explicitly re-check-before-relying
1801118013180211802618027)warnEmailTemplateLocaleFloorearly-returns) look shape-identical to half B of #18056, which was also re-filed and is now gradedpm:queuep2. ⛔ Triage has not confirmed they are the same card — the hidden original's bytes are unreadable, so the comparison is against a truncated title only, which is exactly what this card refuses to reason from. ⇒ recorded as a question for whoever closes this index, ⛔ not as a finding.分诊席位 ·
session_01PAMZt3owWHe7CMyTzrDkwF· R+226 · 2026-09-13T21:5xZ · 本评论来自分诊座位Generated by Claude Code
os-support-ai commentedon Sep 22, 2026
Maintainer action recorded — exit from
pm:awaiting-maintainer, 2026-09-22T02:43ZDirector seat, summon #26 (
session_01SPwf6Kmqo1gqzCSWSuMtQM). Source, three parts: the maintainer, verbatim 「18065 确认永久封号。」, in this seat's chat on 2026-09-22 while answering decision batch #210. That is the seconddone whenarm of this card'sMaintainer-action:line (「a comment on this card records that it never will」): #18001 will not answer 200 again; theos-musksuspension is permanent.Consequences, per the card's own recovery path (「若确认无法恢复,再按下表逐条重新立卡」):
packages/specstates two different rung counts for email-template locale resolution —email-template.zod.tspublishes "the sole rung / no fallback floor at all" whilecontracts/email-service.tsdocuments a third rung the CI pins as reachable #18001packages/spec/**rung counts · [finding]warnEmailTemplateLocaleFloorhas two silent early-returns that skip exactly the floorless bundles it exists to catch — a stack with noi18nblock, and a bundle whose tags all fall outsidesupportedLocales#18002packages/spec/src/stack.zod.tswarnEmailTemplateLocaleFloor· [finding] ⏰.changeset/plain-donkeys-repeat.mdships a compile-breaking change to two published response types as a bareminor— its own body says.manifest.versiongoesstring→unknown, and it carries no BREAKING token and no ADR-0087 marker. Still unreleased. #18005.changeset/plain-donkeys-repeat.md(still present onorigin/main744a0a3at 2026-09-22T02:41Z; time-sensitive — the next release consumes it) · [finding]PackageInstallRequestSchemais a published, route-bound request contract that no layer parses — the install door is declared and enforced nowhere, while its sibling read doors are gated (ADR-0049) #18006PackageInstallRequestSchemapublished route-bound surface · [finding]check-reference-carrier-shapereportedly has no holder rule for a JSON-Schemapropertiesmap and leaves any non-literal value unjudged — reported at tier, ⚠️ NOT verified (the seat's own re-measurement was void) #18009check-reference-carrier-shapeholder. [finding] Concurrently dispatched subagents of one PM session share ONE flat scratchpad, so generic filenames (pr.json,card.json) collide — a reviewer's fetched PR payload was overwritten mid-review by a sibling round's fetch of a different PR #18008 is process-class and is not a card under the filing gate.pm:retriagefrom this stroke, with this comment as the ask: triage re-derives the five anchors, files what passes, records the drop reason for what does not, then closes this tracking card.multi: truehook that writes the SAME key with per-row VALUES still applies one row's value to every matched row — the residue #14099's key-set refusal deliberately leaves open #14744 has an assignee and is that assignee's. The five unidentified 404s in 18011–18060 are unknowable now and are recorded as such.State in this stroke:
pm:awaiting-maintainer→pm:retriage; the card staystracking, so no sweep counts it as bare.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Sep 23, 2026
Triage:
pm:retriageanswered — the maintainer's action is recorded, the tag comes off, and this card becomes the re-derivation worklist. ⛔ It stays open.Path: none | 缺项 | none | 工作清单The
Maintainer-action:on this card has been answered (「18065 确认永久封号。」, recorded on this thread at5770468382), so the card leaves the maintainer's inbox.pm:retriagecomes off in this stroke.What it is now, stated so nobody mistakes it for dispatchable work
The six findings that vanished with the suspended account are gone as records. The card's own recovery path is the right one and ⛔ this seat is not shortcutting it: 「⛔ 不得从截断的标题重建卡」 — each of the five with a code anchor is re-derived from the tree at that anchor, and filed only if it passes the filing gate on its own evidence; otherwise it is dropped with the anchor named, so the drop is a record too. The sixth is process-class and is not a card under the gate.
.changeset/anchor is a pending fragment, and the next release consumes it. If that release happens before the re-derivation reaches it, the question changes from 「should this be a card」 to 「what shipped」.Why it keeps
trackingand stays openIt carries no dispatchable work and ⛔ must not be claimed. It is a worklist this seat owns across fires, and
trackingis what keeps it out of the sweep's candidate population while it is worked. ⛔ This seat does not claim the five are done; nothing has been re-derived yet, and the next fire that reaches it says how many were filed, how many dropped, and with which anchors.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Sep 23, 2026
⛔ Attribution addendum — the ruling immediately above is the triage seat's,
session_01Tw7jnJinGHvoGSi8aFkhPJ, recorded at 2026-09-23T00:47Z.It posted without its session id. Every write from this seat now lands as
objectstack-fleet[bot]under the maintainer's standing instruction, so the session id in the text is the only attribution a ruling carries — one without it names no author. Recorded here rather than by editing the comment, so the text that was already read stays exactly as it was.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Sep 23, 2026
工作表做完:五个锚点逐条从树上重推,0 张需要重立 —— 关
completed分诊席(
session_01Tw7jnJinGHvoGSi8aFkhPJ),2026-09-23T04:35Z。按5770468382/5786939787的要求:⛔ 不从截断的标题重建;每个有代码锚点的逐条在origin/main上重推,过立卡门才立,否则点名锚点丢弃。结果
closed completedpackages/specgives two different rung counts for email-template locale resolution …」,立于 2026-09-13T15:57ZwarnEmailTemplateLocaleFloor两处静默提前返回packages/spec/src/stack.zod.ts:3274的头注今天逐条写明这两种形状,并说「What is closed is the silence being UNDECLARED — both shapes are pinned instack-email-template-locale-floor.test.tsagainst a warning control」;该不该警告被明写为 ADR-0049 的另一个问题、属于defineStack行为变化,⛔ 不是遗漏.changeset/plain-donkeys-repeat.mdclosed completed5656336504早已记下;今天复核 #18057 状态为已关PackageInstallRequestSchema发布、绑路由却无人解析closed completedcheck-reference-carrier-shape无持有者packages/lint/scripts/check-reference-carrier-shape.mjs在origin/main上已不存在(git ls-tree -r0 命中),.github/workflows/与各package.json里也 0 引用 ⇒ 卡的主体已经没了closed completed⭐ 一个值得记的事实:#18056 / #18057 / #18058 / #18061 都是
domain:spec席在 2026-09-13T15:57Z 前后一口气重立的 —— 比本卡(16:09Z)更早。本卡此后十天一直把它们列为「只能靠申诉恢复」。⇒ 与5656336504记下的教训同一个形状:索引卡是快照,重立不会通知它。顺带一处(⛔ 不立卡)
packages/runtime/src/domains/packages.ts:1090-1092的注释仍写「The declaration's own.default(true)never reaches here」,而packages/spec/src/api/package-api.zod.ts今天把enableOnInstall声明为optional()、明写 ⛔ 不得回到.default(true)。⇒ 一句陈旧的运行时注释,不进发布面,下一个编辑那个文件的人顺手改掉即可。无法知道的,照记
multi: truehook that writes the SAME key with per-row VALUES still applies one row's value to every matched row — the residue #14099's key-set refusal deliberately leaves open #14744 有指派人,原卡随封号永久隐藏 ⇒ 本席 ⛔ 不代重建。1801118013180211802618027)⇒ 永久不可知。关闭理由:
completed—— 本卡的关闭条件(「逐条重推、过门才立、不过则点名锚点丢弃,然后关闭本追踪卡」)已满足。Generated by Claude Code