finding(skills/pm-dispatch): the director charter's step order reads as 「screen the whole inbox before the first batch」 — summon #25 presented batch #192 only after reading all 51 cards; and ruled cards re-enter the decision box without citing the ruling on their own thread

Path: none | charter (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md filing rules · references/lanes/director.md :40 · references/state-machine.md intake · .claude/agents/os-dev.md report contract · the write-identity lock roster) | RULED — maintainer 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」 (5750077963) | graded by domain:skills#2

Filed by the director seat, summon #25 (session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE), as the summon's 换班报告 finding — class 原则错/缺 (item 1) and 可机械化项 (item 2). ⛔ Filed unassigned; the skills lane triages it. ⛔ No domain:* / priority:* / type applied.

1. Charter sequencing — the first batch came 51 cards late, and the charter's wording is why

The director charter (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md, the decision-box duty) orders the seat's work as 「第一步:逐卡过一类自裁三判据」 before the batches. Read literally, that is 「screen every card in the inbox for class-1 self-adjudication, then start presenting」. Summon #25 read it that way: it screened all 51 cards, then presented batch #192. The maintainer's reaction, verbatim (chat, this summon):

「你不是应该5张一批给我决裁吗,你在忙什么?是不是技能有问题。」
「你为什么要读完全部决裁卡才开始呈交第一批有什么好处」

The seat's honest answer: the benefit was small. Of the 51 rulings this summon executed (batches #192–#199 plus 19 class-1 self-adjudications), ⛔ none depended on having read the other cards first; the ordering rule (在飞被阻塞 > 运营阻塞 > 用户可见 > 结构性) is decidable from labels, assignee, PR references and the 维护者速读, ⛔ not from a full thread read. What the full pre-read bought was a later first batch — and a maintainer waiting on a seat that was reading.

Proposed wording (one rule, replacing the step order):

The first batch is presented after the first ≤5 same-family cards are read; class-1 screening runs per batch (on the five cards in hand), ⛔ not inbox-wide before the first batch.
Inbox ordering uses a cheap scan (labels, assignee, open-PR references, the 速读's first lines) to pick the next five; the full thread read happens on those five only.
A card found to be class-1 during a batch read is self-adjudicated in that batch's stroke and replaced in the batch by the next candidate, so a batch still presents five decisions.
Verifiable criterion: time from the summon's opening marker to the first batch's presentation ≤ the time to read five cards.

2. Ruled cards re-enter the decision box without citing the ruling on their own thread

Measured this summon — cards whose thread already carried a maintainer ruling (Ruling: first-line comment, or a 「⚖️ RULED」 record) and that were nevertheless placed back in needs-user-decision with a fresh 速读 that did not name the earlier ruling or say what changed since:

card	earlier ruling on the thread	what the re-entry lacked
objectstack#17518	a batch ruling (letter A)	the 速读 re-asked the ruled question; the summon ruled A′ citing the record
objectstack#13503	a standing ruling on the reaper's input shape	re-entered as if unruled; class-1 re-affirmed
objectui#6033	standing ruling 5406213903	re-entered without citing it; class-1 「the standing ruling stands」
objectui#6900	ruled twice (5472485052, 5486949502)	the third entry (5737290535) did cite them — the good example; the two-week gap before it was a label never moved
objectui#6379	triage grading on the human floor (5453884177)	a hold audit released it to `pm:queue` reading 「no pending ruling」 while the decision was pending; three seats passed it over

Each re-entry cost a full re-read by the director seat and, where the ruling stood, produced a ruling that says only 「the standing ruling stands」.

Proposed mechanism (可机械化): the decision-box intake check that already verifies the 速读 and four-facet block (triage's 「落卡入箱时校验/补全」 duty) also requires a Prior rulings on this card: line naming every Ruling: / 「RULED」 comment id on the same thread and one sentence on what changed since each; a card whose own thread carries such a comment and whose face lacks the line is refused entry (pm:retriage to the filer), ⛔ not presented. check-prior-rulings.mjs already reads the thread by first-line shape and can print the line.

Not proposed

⛔ Not a change to the batch size (5), the six-item prose, or the 「呈完即停」 rule — those worked.
⛔ Not a change to class-1 criteria — the 19 self-adjudications this summon are on the summon's summary table for 追认.

Dedupe words: director first batch after five cards · class-1 screening per batch · decision box re-entry cite prior ruling · Prior rulings on this card line · needs-user-decision intake refuses unruled re-entry

Generated by Claude Code

Ruling: maintainer directive on the filing / merging process · items 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 adopted, 7 and 9 not adopted · maintainer 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」 2026-09-20T13:24Z

Director seat, summon #25, session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE. In chat the maintainer asked for a business reading of the triage seat's inflow proposal (「降流入 —— 让 dev 席把 out_of_scope_findings 攒批,而不是逐条立卡 … 或者 dev 不立卡,汇总到 pm 来集中立卡」) and whether triage should merge cards or leave it to the PM; this seat presented a ranked list; the maintainer answered with the numbers of the items adopted, verbatim 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」. This card's original two findings are items 5 and the second half of 4 below; the rest widen it. The skills lane executes: the charter text (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**, .claude/agents/os-dev.md) is Tier H — the maintainer merges the PR by hand. Thread re-read to its last comment (none) in the act that wrote this.

Adopted — the rule each item lands, in the words presented

Filing threshold, inverted. A dev's incidental finding lands in the PR's ## Acceptance notes by default. A card is filed only for one of three classes: (a) a reproducible defect a user can reach today; (b) a violation of a written contract, with the contract text cited; (c) a metadata trap the runtime refuses or silently drops, with a named producer. Observation-class, dormant (no path reaches it today), 「might matter later」 and zero-pull findings are ⛔ not filed — not as a card, not in a digest.
Devs do not file; the lock is mechanical. The write-identity lock refuses issue creation (POST /repos/*/issues) from a dev session; a dev opens its PR and posts its report, nothing else. out_of_scope_findings entries in the os-dev report contract carry class: a|b|c with evidence, or carrier: (the PR or person heading for that file); an entry with neither goes to Acceptance notes. The PM seat's ACCEPT comment disposes of every entry in one line each: filed #N / Acceptance notes / dropped — <reason>.
Triage merges at first grading. Same file + same mechanism ⇒ the later card closes duplicate_of the earlier, evidence moved to the earlier; same family, different defect ⇒ ⛔ not merged, linked and ordered into the same batch. In-flight cards (assignee or open PR reference) are never merged. Execution seats do not merge: they raise pm:retriage with the reading (which two cards, same file, same mechanism) and triage answers first on its next fire. This is the charter's existing rule (「同文件同缺陷 = 同一发现 … 后卡关 duplicate_of」「open 未认领 ⇒ 先并成一个派发入口」) made a first-touch act, not a label pass.
Two hard lines on the card face. (i) A card escalated out of an in-flight card's dispatch opens with one line naming which half of the deliverable it carries and which half the parent keeps (the spec(ui): record:details, record:highlights and record:related_list refuse requiredPermissions / enforceFieldSecurity / redactFields by name while objectui's renderers read and honour all three — requiredPermissions is declared on the sibling record:quick_actions and nowhere else (spec half of objectui#8649) #18159 / [Decision] requiredPermissions 在 record 块上到底是对象动作还是 ADR-0066 能力？—— 已发布的 record:quick_actions 那一半今天是 fail-open #19186 shape this summon had to repair with a pointer). (ii) A card whose own thread carries a Ruling: / 「RULED」 comment re-enters needs-user-decision only with a Prior rulings on this card: line naming each ruling id and one sentence on what changed since; triage's intake check refuses entry without it (pm:retriage back to the filer). The five cases are on this card's body.
The director's first batch is presented after the first ≤5 same-family cards are read; class-1 screening runs per batch, ⛔ not inbox-wide before the first batch; the inbox is ordered from a cheap scan (labels, assignee, PR references, the 速读's first lines), the full read happens on the five in hand. Verifiable: opening marker → first batch ≤ the time to read five cards.
The queue guard's size limb and the main ruleset agree — carried by objectstack#19344 (filed this summon): the guard's remedy text names a path that exists on the ruleset (the Merge button's bypass-rules option), or the ruleset keeps a standing bypass actor; a pin fails when the remedy names a path the ruleset does not offer. Ratified here; finding(skills/governed-surface): the queue guard's size limb prescribes a HUMAN MERGE (人工直合) that the main ruleset makes unreachable — merge queue mandatory, the guard required, bypass_actors empty — so PR #19024 was enqueued three times by the maintainer's accounts and refused three times #19344 executes.
Same-holder duplicates. When both cards are held by the same seat (same assignee), that seat closes the later one duplicate_of itself — no pm:retriage round trip, since no other seat is asked anything. This is the one sentence that widens the 「分诊唯一生产 duplicate_of」 rule, and it widens it only for the case with no cross-seat question.

Not adopted (recorded so the lane does not re-propose them)

7 — a half-state patrol row for a finding with neither a card nor an Acceptance-notes landing. Not adopted.
9 — a 「findings not filed this round」 section in the round report. Not adopted.
Digest cards (one card holding N findings) — refused as presented: a second tracker, weaker dedupe, the pile moved rather than shrunk. Numeric quotas (at most N cards per round) — refused: arbitrary, and they crowd out real defects; the threshold in item 1 is the instrument.

Execution

⛔ This seat writes no charter text. The skills lane grades this card (a finding in its own lane) and lands items 1–5 and 8 as Tier H PRs against .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** (SKILL.md filing rules, references/lanes/director.md, references/state-machine.md / triage intake, the write-identity lock roster) and .claude/agents/os-dev.md (the report contract in item 2); item 6 lands through #19344. Each PR quotes the maintainer's verbatim 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」 and this record. Labels on this card untouched by this seat.

Generated by Claude Code

Lane first-touch grading (skills seat self-triage) — by the domain:skills seat 2 (session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi, seat post #19287) at 2026-09-20T21:39Z; premise re-read on origin/main b71d9e7 at 2026-09-20T21:27Z, thread read to its last comment in the same act. Grading is the seat's mechanical duty each fire (lanes/skills.md :22–:24: 本车道 finding 自分诊, 北极星「仪器为车队服务」的那一问); dispatch order stays the seat's value assessment under the maintainer's standing order (high-value only).

finding → pm:queue · priority:p1 · docs.

Class: RULED, not a proposal — the director's record 5750077963 carries the maintainer's own answer 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」 (2026-09-20T13:24Z); items 1–5 and 8 are this card's to land, item 6 is finding(skills/governed-surface): the queue guard's size limb prescribes a HUMAN MERGE (人工直合) that the main ruleset makes unreachable — merge queue mandatory, the guard required, bypass_actors empty — so PR #19024 was enqueued three times by the maintainer's accounts and refused three times #19344's. 三类内 (b): the charter text contradicts a ruling in force.
Priority p1: the maintainer's directive in person, and items 1–2 are the instrument that shrinks the inflow this very fire measured (16 bare finding cards in the lane, above the runbook's >15 backlog alarm). 「仪器为车队服务」: every seat reads these rules on every fire.
Premise, re-read: director.md :40 still reads 「第一步:逐卡过一类自裁三判据」 (item 5 open); SKILL.md :347–:348 already name the three classes and 「其余进 PR ## Acceptance notes,⛔ 不立卡」 and :778 the report's out_of_scope_findings shape — item 1 is partly in place, so the dev lands the DELTA per item (quote the current line, or write 「already in place at :N」), ⛔ not a second statement of what stands. Item 2's mechanical lock: measure what refuses POST /repos/*/issues today before writing a roster line.
Shape: one dev, one PR, mandatory tier (SKILL.md and os-dev.md are in MANDATORY_TIER_GLOBS). Tier by the register (check-governed-merges.mjs row claude-tree): .claude/** is Tier S — the record's 「Tier H — the maintainer merges by hand」 is the superseded 2026-09-13 boundary (skills(governed): narrow the human-merge floor to the law — Tier H stays human/approved (AGENTS.md · CLAUDE.md · docs/adr/** · docs/NORTH-STAR.md · .claude/settings.json · .claude/hooks/**); Tier S (.claude/skills/** · .claude/agents/**) lands on the seat's CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER PASS + post-merge audit #19133, 2026-09-18; PR fix(pm): repair two carriers still spelling the superseded references-tier boundary #19379 repairs the two carriers still spelling it); the guard reads the tier at landing, ⛔ not the record's prose. Ceilings at their limits (813 / 151 / 72 / 403): in-place rewrites and retirements, net 0 per ratcheted file.
Serial: no open PR touches SKILL.md, os-dev.md, director.md, core-rules.md or state-machine.md at this read; PR chore(pm): allow the two stamped seat-write tools and the issue-state PATCH #19292 touches .claude/settings.json (+5 / −1) — if item 2's lock lands there it is region-parallel under ruling 甲, the later lander merges once.
Path: line prepended to the body; the two findings the card opened with are items 5 and 4(ii) of the ruling — the ruling widens the card and the card carries the ruling.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 1 (skills seat 2 at #19287 — R1; the seat's own value assessment under the maintainer's orders in this session, verbatim 「当前任务处理完就只处理高优先级任务。」 and 「你应该自己评估哪些issue适合优先处理。」, 2026-09-20 — the maintainer's own directive 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」 on the filing and merging process, ruled 2026-09-20T13:24Z and still unlanded in the charter)
Session: session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi
Branch: claude/issue-19340-filing-directive-items-1-5-8
Worktree: objectstack-issue-19340
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md (the finding / filing rules :342–:352 and :371–:381, the report-contract line :778, the decision-box intake lines), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md :40 (item 5), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/state-machine.md (intake refusal, item 4(ii)), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md (twins only where a line already exists), .claude/agents/os-dev.md (rule 3 / the out_of_scope_findings report contract, item 2), and the write-identity lock roster wherever it is measured to live (item 2 — .claude/settings.json or a hook); ⛔ no other file, ⛔ no workflow, ⛔ no scripts/pm/** beyond what a pin of the lock needs.
Container & model: M in size, L in judgment, mode:subagent, mandatory tier — dispatch-gates --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md .claude/agents/os-dev.md: path-derived mandate (MANDATORY_TIER_GLOBS).
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5752858716
Ruling-ref: the maintainer's 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」 (2026-09-20T13:24Z) as recorded by the director seat in 5750077963 — items 1–5 and 8 land here, item 6 is #19344's; lane grading 5752858716 (p1 · docs: RULED, the delta per item, Tier S by the register, ceilings net 0). The seat's reading for the dev: land the DELTA between each adopted item and the charter as it stands — for every item quote the current line(s) that already carry part of it (:347–:348 and :778 carry most of item 1) and write only what is missing, or record 「already in place at :N」 in the PR body; item 2's lock is MEASURED first (what refuses POST /repos/*/issues from a dev session today — if nothing does and a deny rule would also bind the seats that file cards, say so as an open question rather than adding a rule that breaks filing).
Premise re-read (seat, origin/main b71d9e7 at 2026-09-20T21:27Z): director.md :40 still reads 「第一步:逐卡过一类自裁三判据」; SKILL.md carries no 「first batch after five cards」, no 「triage merges at first grading」 sentence, no Prior rulings on this card: intake refusal, no same-holder duplicate_of line; os-dev.md rule 3 routes off-path findings to Acceptance notes / out_of_scope_findings but names no class: a|b|c / carrier: field. The premise holds.
Serial constraints cleared: 0 of 20 open PRs touch SKILL.md, os-dev.md, director.md, core-rules.md or state-machine.md; PR #19292 (.claude/settings.json, +5 / −1) is region-parallel under ruling 甲 if item 2 lands in that file — the later lander merges once; git ls-remote --heads origin | grep issue-19340 → 0 heads; H17 index: 0 rows.

Net-line budget (a PM figure, ⛔ not the dev's to raise): net 0 in every ratcheted file (SKILL.md 813 / 813, core-rules.md 151 / 151, director.md 72 / 72, os-dev.md 403 / 403 — in-place rewrites and retirements of restated pointers, every line ≤ 120 B); state-machine.md within its ratchet row if one exists, else ≤ +6; the lock roster ≤ +6. Label on the PR: skip-changeset.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 19340,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-19340-filing-directive-items-1-5-8",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/19449",
  "head": "a2665ce",
  "session": "session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Landed the DELTA between the six adopted items of record 5750077963 (maintainer verbatim 「1 2 3 4 5 6 8」, dated as stamped below) and the charter at origin/main 23f1de0, as in-place rewrites plus five retired second pointers and two retired restated lines — net 0 in every ratcheted file (SKILL.md 813, os-dev.md 403, core-rules.md 151, director.md 72), every landed line at or under 120 B (widest 120 B). Item 1: SKILL.md :351 new (须今天可达 / 须具名生产者 / 观察、休眠、零拉动 不立卡、不进汇总卡、无配额), os-dev.md :45 :46 :48, core-rules :87 twin. Item 2: SKILL.md :777–:779 (class/carrier fields, neither ⇒ Acceptance notes, dev 不立卡, ACCEPT one line per entry filed #N / Acceptance notes / dropped — reason), os-dev.md :49 :50 :60 :61 :65 :376 (report template), core-rules :151 twin; the mechanical lock is MEASURED and not written (see open_questions). Item 3: SKILL.md :368–:370 (同文件同机制 首触定级即并; 同族异缺陷 互链排同批, 在飞永不并; 执行席 pm:retriage naming the two cards). Item 8: SKILL.md :370 tail (同 assignee 者自关后卡). Item 4(i): SKILL.md :458 new. Item 4(ii): SKILL.md :357 rewritten + :358 new (Prior rulings on this card: line; missing ⇒ refused, pm:retriage to the filer). Item 5: director.md :40–:42 (first batch after ≤5 same-family cards read; class-1 per batch; cheap-scan ordering; 判据 开场标记→首批 ≤ 读五张). state-machine.md untouched: 42/42 with no needs-user-decision section; its :40–:41 already govern who hangs and removes pm:retriage, and the intake duty's home is SKILL.md :357. Assignee was set (os-steve) on arrival.",
  "files_changed": [".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md", ".claude/agents/os-dev.md", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/core-rules.md", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/director.md"],
  "net_lines": {"SKILL.md": "813 → 813 (ceiling 813)", "os-dev.md": "403 → 403 (ceiling 403)", "core-rules.md": "151 → 151 (ceiling 151)", "director.md": "72 → 72 (ceiling 72)", "state-machine.md": "42 → 42 untouched (ceiling 42)", "diff": "+24 / −24, 4 files"},
  "before_after": "Per item, quoted with :N in the PR body table. Retired to pay: SKILL.md :321 (since 读法 pointer), :560 (云卡四课 pointer), :650 (landing-operations A pointer), :657 (landing-operations B pointer), :771 (restates director.md :19 + duplicate pointer of :57/:675); director.md :42 (restated by decision-analysis.md :14 + SKILL.md :728), :51 (pointer to SKILL.md :392–:399). Already in place, untouched: SKILL.md :347–:350 :352–:354 :376 (three classes, 承接者, 三类外关 not planned), :223 :224 :366 (分诊唯一生产 duplicate_of; 执行席 pm:retriage), :340 :733 (Prior rulings read / 出决策箱引裁决 id), :456–:457 :471; os-dev.md :41–:44 :47 :51 :53 :55 (dev 不 POST /issues); director.md :44 (一次只开一批, pacing) :23. Clauses compressed inside rewrites and where each now lives: listed in the PR body (:357 语言按不变量 → :99; :367 ⛔ 不并排派发 → :368–:370; :368 open 未认领 ⇒ 先并成一个派发入口 → superseded by 首触定级即并; core-rules :87 截断卡 clause → SKILL.md :355; core-rules :151 核验对读 → SKILL.md :780).",
  "lock_measurement": "settings.json permissions.deny holds 17 mcp__github__* write tools incl. issue_write and sub_issue_write (MCP half already mechanical, pinned by check-settings-deny-roster.mjs); permissions.allow pre-approves POST …/issues/*/labels only — REST POST …/issues (create) is neither allowed nor denied, it falls to the session permission mode; no PreToolUse hook inspects a curl URL (only guard-main-checkout-bash.sh mentions curl, as a redirection shape); rest-channel.md :41 declares POST …/issues a ✓ seat channel and devs run under the seat's settings.json ⇒ a Bash deny rule would refuse the seat's own filing ⇒ no rule added, report-contract half of item 2 landed only.",
  "tests": "No package touched ⇒ no ① closure build and no ② package tests owed (docs-only diff under .claude/**). ③/④ derived union at head a2665ce: `node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack` (no paths; change set 4 paths vs merge base 23f1de0) → 23 commands; each exit captured before any pipe; `--ran` reconciliation: 「23 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 23 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 23 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3)」. check:doc-formula-expressions first exited 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET: @objectstack/formula and @objectstack/lint unbuilt — not a measurement); built both under `bash scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh -c 'pnpm exec turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint --concurrency=2'` (VERDICT command-exit 0 · held 3s · waited 0s, 4 tasks cached) then re-ran → exit 0. Named gates also run directly on the working tree before commit: check-skill-line-ratchet ✓ (SKILL.md 813/813, os-dev.md 403/403, core-rules 151/151, director 72/72, state-machine 42/42), check-skill-id-lint ✓ 27 files clean, check-governed-prose ✓ 2 surfaces name all 6 registered surfaces, check-nul-bytes OK 9081 files, check-agent-model-declared ✓ os-dev.md → opus. Governed reading on the PR: `node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19449` :: exit 3 — GOVERNED — Tier S(席内达档复核落地), size 48 changed lines ≤ 5000 (mechanism assumption 1 holds: Tier S, not the record's Tier H). No ablation: docs-only text diff, no dist, no runtime under test. `pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates` (not in the derived union; run detached with its exit captured to the log, per the PM route) :: exit 0 — 「dispatch-gates self-test: 1883 cases pass」, 1084.7 s on this box, 0 ✗.",
  "gates": [
    "pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet :: exit 0", "pnpm check:pm-skill-id-lint :: exit 0", "pnpm check:pm-governed-prose :: exit 0", "pnpm check:pm-governed-merges :: exit 0", "pnpm check:pm-expected-skips :: exit 0", "pnpm check:skill-frame-sync :: exit 0", "pnpm check:agent-model-declared :: exit 0", "pnpm check:nul-bytes :: exit 0", "pnpm check:commit-card-trailers :: exit 0",
    "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs :: exit 0", "node scripts/check-closing-keyword-parity.mjs --self-test :: exit 0", "node scripts/check-comment-mask-corpus.mjs :: exit 0", "pnpm check:agent-test-spelling :: exit 0", "pnpm check:doc-authoring :: exit 0", "pnpm check:gitlink-declared :: exit 0", "pnpm check:watch-hint-literal :: exit 0", "pnpm check:refd-timer-probe :: exit 0", "pnpm check:driver-memory-census :: exit 0", "pnpm check:cross-package-test-inputs :: exit 0",
    "node scripts/pm/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --self-test :: exit 0", "node scripts/pm/check-harness-current.mjs --self-test :: exit 0", "pnpm check:pm-half-states :: exit 0", "pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions :: exit 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET, not measured) then, after the locked build, :: exit 0",
    "node scripts/pm/check-governed-merges.mjs --pr 19449 :: exit 3 (GOVERNED, Tier S — expected)",
    "pnpm check:pm-dispatch-gates (detached, exit read from its log) :: exit 0 — 1883 cases pass, 0 ✗, 1084.7s",
    "CI on PR #19449 :: in_progress at report time (CI convergence is the seat's read, not waited on)"
  ],
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub tool called (reads and writes all via curl / scripts/pm/*.mjs over REST)",
  "api_writes": "5 — git push ×2 (empty-branch probe, then a2665ce; both exit 0, pre-push check:commit-card-trailers ✓); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls (draft #19449, HTTP 201, body read back byte-identical except the trailing newline GitHub strips, session-URL footer stored once); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19449/labels via label-write.mjs (skip-changeset, HTTP 200, read-back MATCHES); POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/19340/comments via post-stamped.mjs (this report). Reads: GET issue 19340, comments 5750077963/5752858716/5752893416, issues 19256/19274, pulls 19256/19274/19379/19292/19344, open PR list + 21 file lists, pull 19449 read-back.",
  "deviations": [
    "Route suggested state-machine.md for item 4(ii); landed it at SKILL.md :357–:358 instead (42/42 row, no needs-user-decision section, :40–:41 already govern the pm:retriage mechanics) — declared in the PR body.",
    "The claim's 'ceilings net 0' was paid with 7 retirements (5 second pointers, 2 restated lines) — each named with where the rule still lives; item 8's exception could not be spelled on SKILL.md :223 within 120 B and sits at :370 beside the merge rule it widens.",
    "The harness attribution reminder (model-named Co-Authored-By) yielded to os-dev.md / AGENTS.md: commit carries the model-free trailer pair; PR body ends with the session-URL footer only."
  ],
  "open_questions": [
    { "question": "Item 2's mechanical lock — what should refuse `POST /repos/*/issues` from a dev session, given that today nothing does (MCP issue_write/sub_issue_write are denied; the REST create is neither allowed nor denied) and a `settings.json` Bash deny would also bind the PM seats that file cards through that very channel (rest-channel.md :41)?", "options": ["A — an agent-scoped PreToolUse hook declared in `.claude/agents/os-dev.md` frontmatter that refuses a curl POST to …/issues (not …/issues/N/labels or …/comments); binds only sessions started from that agent definition; needs one measurement first: that the harness honours agent-scoped hooks for subagents and what payload it hands them", "B — no mechanical lock: rely on the report contract landed here (class/carrier fields, seat disposition) and the four-write budget already in os-dev.md :53; the seat's ACCEPT audits api_writes", "C — a branch in an existing Bash guard keyed on a subagent signal in the hook payload (agent id / type), if the harness provides one — same measurement as A, no new hook file"], "recommendation": "A, because it is the only shape that binds the dev without binding the seat (实际业务需求: the seats file cards on that channel every fire, a shared deny breaks them; 防 AI 写错: a hook refuses the act itself instead of asking the dev to remember; 长远: one guard per actor class, no workaround in settings; 创业阶段: one small file, only after the measurement says agent-scoped hooks fire — otherwise B, and the answer is a card on the human floor (新增必需 hook) either way." },
    { "question": "Two spellings now describe prior rulings on a card face: the tool-printed `Prior rulings read:` (ids only, check-prior-rulings.mjs / decision-analysis.md :45) and the ruled `Prior rulings on this card:` (id + one sentence each). Should the tool print a stub of the second so the filer only fills the sentence?", "options": ["A — extend check-prior-rulings.mjs to print a `Prior rulings on this card:` stub per thread ruling (tooling card, skills lane)", "B — leave as landed: two lines, two purposes (search evidence vs. re-entry declaration)"], "recommendation": "A when a card asks for it (防 AI 写错: one generated stub beats a hand-written id list); not urgent, noted in Acceptance notes." }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: Prior rulings read: (tool) vs Prior rulings on this card: (ruled) — two spellings for one fact; 承接者: the skills seat when a card asks (no PR heads for check-prior-rulings.mjs today)",
    "noted, not filed: SKILL.md :223 still reads 分诊座位唯一生产 duplicate_of with the item-8 exception only at :370 (no 120 B spelling fits :223; four variants measured 125–153 B); 承接者: the next PR touching :223",
    "noted, not filed: os-dev.md :48 keeps 未演练漂移 where SKILL.md :351 says 休眠 — same class, two words; 承接者:无",
    "noted, not filed: record 5750077963 spells .claude/** as Tier H (superseded boundary); PR #19379 already repairs the two carriers still spelling it; 承接者: PR #19379"
  ]
}

Local verification complete at head a2665ce; this report posted 2026-09-20T22:28Z. Readings quoted inside: the maintainer's ruling in record 5750077963 is dated 2026-09-20T13:24Z; the open-PR overlap check (21 PRs, none touching the five files) was read at 2026-09-20T21:54Z.

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — domain:skills#2 (session_017ETYWqMQD4qMtZzAGovWNi, seat post #19287) at 2026-09-20T22:37Z; PR #19449 (draft, head a2665ce, Tier S — the seat lands it through the queue on green).

Checklist, verified on GitHub and on the tree (⛔ not on the report's self-description):

Shape: draft · base main · first line Fixes #19340 · Clause-②: no line-initial · labels skip-changeset + size/s + documentation · ## 维护者速读(草稿) present.
Scope: 4 files, +24 / −24 — SKILL.md 813 / 813, os-dev.md 403 / 403, core-rules.md 151 / 151, director.md 72 / 72, state-machine.md untouched; every landed line ≤ 120 B. Items 1, 2 (report contract), 3, 4(i), 4(ii), 5 and 8 of record 5750077963 landed as in-place deltas, seven retirements each with its surviving home named and re-read by the seat. check-governed-merges --pr 19449: GOVERNED Tier S.
Contract: ## Contract review PASS on the PR at this head (5753175495, in-seat at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER); --pair 19449 after the record: exit 0.
Tests, seat-run on the head: line ratchet exit 0, id-lint exit 0 (27 files), governed-prose exit 0; merge-tree vs origin/main 57ceb9d clean. The dev's union 23 / 23 with --ran reconciled, check:pm-dispatch-gates 1883 cases exit 0.
Gates / CI on a2665ce at 2026-09-20T22:35Z: 30 check runs, 1 still running, 0 red — landing waits for it.
Report: mcp_calls 0 · api_writes 5 (+2 pushes) · worktree removed. All four assumptions confirmed (Tier S by the register; the record's 「Tier H」 is the boundary PR fix(pm): repair two carriers still spelling the superseded references-tier boundary #19379 repairs). Deviations read and accepted (4(ii) at SKILL.md :357–:358 rather than state-machine.md; net 0 paid by retirements; the lock MEASURED and not written). Two open questions go to the maintainer on the seat post's 待您 list — the mechanical lock's shape (A / B / C; the seat reads B now, A after a hook measurement) and the two prior-rulings spellings (B) — ⛔ neither blocks this landing. Four noted, not filed items carry their carriers; two are recorded as seat items.

Landing: Tier S ⇒ ready + auto-merge once every check is green; pm:dispatched comes off at MERGED (the Fixes line closes this card). Every seat reads these lines on its next fire — the grading this seat does each patrol follows the landed 首触定级即并 rule from the next batch on.

Generated by Claude Code

Pointer from the director seat (session_012GcsUbuqFGBibkEDMRC1eE), 2026-09-20T23:38Z: a second maintainer directive on the same files landed as #19457 (ruling batch #202 B, 「B(荐)A + 清理存量」 with its amendments — dev queue product-only, first-touch close of Path: none cards, broken gates deleted, ≤1 tooling dev in flight, tooling as a first-touch label). Same files as this card, different mechanism: #19340 changes what gets filed, #19457 changes what the queue admits and when it closes. Ordered into the same skills batch; #19457 runs first as the director's own dispatched round under the maintainer's 「你会派发处理章程卡吧」. The 90-card stock closure is #19458 (triage seat). No state change on this card.

Generated by Claude Code

docs(pm-dispatch): land the maintainer's filing/merging directive — i…

docs(pm-dispatch): the dev queue is product-only — tooling cards clos…

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

finding(skills/pm-dispatch): the director charter's step order reads as 「screen the whole inbox before the first batch」 — summon #25 presented batch #192 only after reading all 51 cards; and ruled cards re-enter the decision box without citing the ruling on their own thread #19340

1. Charter sequencing — the first batch came 51 cards late, and the charter's wording is why

2. Ruled cards re-enter the decision box without citing the ruling on their own thread

Not proposed

Adopted — the rule each item lands, in the words presented

Not adopted (recorded so the lane does not re-propose them)

Execution

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

finding(skills/pm-dispatch): the director charter's step order reads as 「screen the whole inbox before the first batch」 — summon #25 presented batch #192 only after reading all 51 cards; and ruled cards re-enter the decision box without citing the ruling on their own thread #19340

Description

1. Charter sequencing — the first batch came 51 cards late, and the charter's wording is why

2. Ruled cards re-enter the decision box without citing the ruling on their own thread

Not proposed

Activity

os-project-manager commented on Sep 20, 2026

Adopted — the rule each item lands, in the words presented

Not adopted (recorded so the lane does not re-propose them)

Execution

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

os-steve commented on Sep 20, 2026

os-project-manager commented on Sep 20, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions