Repository navigation
.claude/settings.json: allow the fleet relay's landing strokes (node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs, ops pr_ready / automerge_enable) so a seat lands a Tier S PR by the register; landing-operations.md names the direct invocation #23432
Description
Ruled: 6164613078 · letter A · 2026-10-14T08:53Z
The problem in one sentence: the Tier S landing path (an at-tier review of record plus the queue, landing-operations.md:51) cannot be driven from a seat's session, because the session's permission classifier refuses the relay's landing dispatch: on PR #23417 (pr_ready + automerge_enable) as "Self-Approval", on PR #23389 (automerge_enable alone) as "Merge Without Review"; .claude/settings.json already allows post-stamped, label-write, close-cards, issue-create, issue-transfer and the curl ccr/ready_for_review / ccr/auto_merge endpoints, but not node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs, the one write tool the landing strokes go through.
Filed by the director seat (summon #37, session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeB) on the maintainer's word, 2026-10-14, verbatim: 「给 Bash 加一条许可规则，允许 scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs 的落地写入（pr_ready / automerge_enable），以后 Tier S 的 PR 我就能按登记册自己落地」「这个你应该派卡开发」. ⛔ Not a claim.
Scope
-
.claude/settings.json,permissions.allow: two entries beside the existingpost-stamped/label-writepairs, exact:Bash(node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *)Bash(node --use-env-proxy scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *)
Nothing else in the file moves. The relay's own controls stay the gate: every op is validated by
fleet-write/validate.mjs,pr_update_branchneedsexpected_head_sha, every stroke is paced bywrite-pace.mjs, and the queue runscheck-governed-queue-guardon the merge group (an at-tier record on the head, or the maintainer's approval, is still what lets a governed PR through). -
landing-operations.md:51(101 lines; read its ratchet ceiling first, net-zero if at it): the strokes are invoked directly asnode scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo OWNER/NAME --actions-file F(no shell wrapper in front: the allow rule matches the command as typed), and a write-pace refusal (exit 10) is retried by the seat afternode scripts/pm/write-pace.mjs --statusshows a free slot. One sentence, ≤ 120 bytes, no issue number. -
⛔ No wider glob, no other tool, no
settings.local.json; objectui and cloud settings untouched (the relay lives in objectstack, and a seat lands any repo's PR from the objectstack checkout).
Governance
.claude/** is Tier S on the register: the PR is governed whole and opens as a draft; the director seat posts the at-tier review of record. Until this PR lands the rule is not in force, so its own landing needs the maintainer's Approve once; after it, a seat's Tier S landing runs by the register.
Acceptance
node -e "JSON.parse(require('fs').readFileSync('.claude/settings.json','utf8'))"exit 0; the diff of the settings file adds exactly two lines; the two strings are byte-exact as above.pnpm -s check:pm-skill-ratchet,check:pm-skill-id-lint,check:skill-frame-sync,check:pm-governed-prose,check:nul-bytesexit 0; the derived families for the diff run and reconcile with--ran.- After landing, one live proof recorded on this card by the seat: a Tier S landing stroke (
pr_ready+automerge_enable) runs from a seat session without a permission prompt.
Not in scope
- How the classifier reads MCP tools or other write tools; the scratchpad pacing wrapper seats use today (the direct invocation replaces it for landing strokes).
Dedupe
Open domain:skills cards read: #23426, #23423, #23420, #23410, #23409, #23396, #23381, #23378, #23377, #23374, #22060, #17161; none is this. The search API is not available to this session.
Related: PR #23417 · PR #23389 · rest-channel.md:55 (the F spelling) · landing-operations.md:51.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 1 · the director seat dispatching on the maintainer's word 「这个你应该派卡开发」 (this seat's session, 2026-10-14T08:17Z)
Session:
session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeBAccount:
os-zhuangBranch:
claude/issue-23432-relay-landing-allow-ruleWorktree:
objectstack-issue-23432Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#9File surface (at
origin/main4f81f3152or later):.claude/settings.json(permissions.allow: two entries, nothing else),.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md(line 51's sentence, within its ratchet ceiling, net-zero if at it). ⛔ No other file, ⛔ no wider glob, ⛔ no model name, ⛔ no issue number in a skill file, ⛔ not.github/workflows/**, ⛔ not objectui or cloud.Container & model:
M,mode:subagent,model: default tier(dispatch-gates --tieron the paths: no path-derived mandate)..claude/**is on the governed register: the PR is governed whole and stays a draft; the seat posts the at-tier review of record; this PR's own landing is the maintainer's Approve (the rule is not in force until it lands); ⛔ the dev never readies, queues or approves it.Clause-②: no (no published door; a session permission setting and one charter sentence)
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect cardThread-read: none
Ruling-ref: the maintainer's words in this seat's session, 2026-10-14, quoted in the card body;
landing-operations.md:51;rest-channel.md:55Serial constraints cleared (the open PRs' file lists read in this act): none touches
.claude/settings.jsonorlanding-operations.md; #23417 (this seat's,seat-post-protocol.md,filing-gate.md, two scripts) and #23389 (merged) are disjoint. Mergeorigin/mainbefore opening the PR; ⛔ no rebase.Resume-from: none
This act moved the card
pm:queue→pm:dispatchedand assignedos-zhuang. The PR carriesFixes #23432.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 23432,
"status": "blocked",
"branch": "claude/issue-23432-relay-landing-allow-rule",
"pr": null,
"session": "session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeB (subagent run; the dispatching seat's session id)",
"reported_at": "2026-10-14T08:29Z",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Stopped before any commit: in this run the session's auto-mode permission classifier refused a step with reason [Self-Modification]. The refused step was a read-only verification right after the edits. The card's change adds two entries to the fleet's own Claude Code permission allow-list (.claude/settings.json), so agent sessions could run the relay's pr_ready + automerge_enable landing strokes without a prompt. The same classifier refused exactly those strokes as Self-Approval and Merge Without Review. A dispatch from another agent cannot authorize a change to permission configuration, so I did not route around the refusal. I reverted my uncommitted edits: the worktree is clean at origin/main 04a3148, the remote branch is the empty write-route probe at the same sha, and no PR exists. The prepared change is spelled out byte-exact in before_after so the maintainer can apply it by hand or authorize it. The premise holds on origin/main 04a3148: settings.json has no fleet-write entry; landing-operations.md is 101 lines against ratchet ceiling 101; line 51 reads as the card says; rest-channel.md:50 and :55 carry the relay and F spellings.",
"tests": "git fetch origin main: origin/main = 04a3148 (merge-base --is-ancestor 4f81f31 origin/main exit 0). git worktree add (sibling layout /home/user/objectstack-issue-23432, not the fallback) exit 0. git push -u (empty branch, write-route probe) exit 0. pnpm install --frozen-lockfile exit 0 ('Done in 7.2s'), git status clean after install. Edit script: each anchor asserted to match exactly once; it printed the new lines at 119 and 95 bytes and exited 0. Post-edit verification: one command was to run git diff, grep -c counts of injected and deleted text, node JSON.parse of .claude/settings.json, and a byte-width scan. It was REFUSED by the auto-mode classifier, reason [Self-Modification], so it was NOT MEASURED. Revert: git checkout HEAD -- .claude/settings.json .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md exit 0; git status --porcelain = 0 lines; HEAD 04a3148.",
"gates": "NOT MEASURED, every family: check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:pm-governed-prose, check:nul-bytes, check:skill-frame-sync, the dispatch-gates --commands derivation with --ran reconciliation, and check-governed-merges --test. Reason: the run stopped at the classifier refusal before any gate ran, and the branch now carries no diff for a gate to read.",
"files_changed": "none (branch == origin/main 04a3148)",
"before_after": "Prepared, reverted, never committed. Counts come from the edit script's anchor asserts; the post-edit diff --stat was the refused step and was not measured. (1) .claude/settings.json, permissions.allow: two lines inserted directly after the line 'Bash(node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs *)' (line 70), in the plain-then-env-proxy pair order the close-cards / issue-create / issue-transfer pairs use: "Bash(node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *)", then "Bash(node --use-env-proxy scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *)". Expected stat: 135 to 137 lines, +2/-0. (2) landing-operations.md. Line 51 is unchanged at 118 bytes. Two lines go after it: '- 直敲
node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo OWNER/NAME --actions-file F,⛔ 套壳:许可逐字匹配。' (119 bytes) and '- 写节流拒(exit 10) ⇒ 待node scripts/pm/write-pace.mjs --status现空槽再重试。' (95 bytes). The two command spans alone are 118 bytes, so the sentence cannot fit one 120-byte line. The file is at its ceiling (101 of 101), so two restatements are deleted to pay. Line 69 ('卡以 completed 关闭且带Adopts:行 ⇒ 同一动作在所指 fork PR 贴致谢与落地链接并关闭它。') restates external-contributions.md:14; line 7 already routes every fork PR to that file, and that file's back-pointer names line 7, not 69. Line 96 ('auto-merge 由 PM 挂,dev 永不碰。') restates line 95 (PM arms auto-merge) plus os-dev.md rule 4 (dev never merges); it addresses a dev who never reads this seat-only file. Expected stat: +2/-2, 101 lines, ceiling unchanged. No gate pins either deleted line (git grep over scripts and .github).","deviations": [
"Stopped at the classifier refusal [Self-Modification]: no commit, no PR, no pr_create stroke. The refused command was a read-only post-edit verification; I did not retry it by another tool or route.",
"Reverted my own uncommitted edits to both files (git checkout HEAD --), so no unreviewed permission-config change is left in a worktree.",
"OS_PM_WRITE_HOURLY_MAX=80 not set: write-pace --status at 2026-10-14T08:28Z read 18 of 40 used, 22 left, verdict 'the next write may go'. Its header marks the override as for tests.",
"The empty branch claude/issue-23432-relay-landing-allow-rule stays on the remote at 04a3148, as the claim's landing marker; nothing was deleted.",
"Worktree /home/user/objectstack-issue-23432 removed after this report: node_modules first, then git worktree remove on the clean tree, no --force."
],
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "1: this report, post-stamped.mjs comment on objectstack-ai/objectstack issue 23432 through the fleet-write relay. git push is not a REST write. No label writes. skip-changeset would be owed on the PR if one is opened, because no package ships .claude/**.",
"open_questions": [
{
"question": "Who authors the allow-rule change, given an agent-authored run of it was refused as Self-Modification by the permission classifier?",
"options": [
"A: the maintainer applies the prepared diff by hand, or opens the PR from their own session; the seat's at-tier review and landing then follow the register. Cost: one manual edit of 2 + net-zero lines, already spelled out above.",
"B: the maintainer authorizes it in their own words to the session that will author it, or through the permission system (approving the prompt), and a dev re-runs this card from the prepared diff. Cost: one more dispatch round.",
"C: drop the allow rule; Tier S landing strokes keep a per-stroke prompt that the maintainer clicks. Cost: a human click per Tier S landing, with no code change."
],
"recommendation": "A. The change widens agent permissions specifically past the classifier's Self-Approval and Merge Without Review refusals. A human-authored change keeps that authorization where the permission system looks for it, and the diff is small and already prepared."
},
{
"question": "Scope: Bash(node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *) admits every op in the relay's closed table (fleet-write/ops.mjs: comment, comment_edit, labels_add, labels_remove, assign, unassign, issue_patch, issue_create, pr_create, pr_request_reviewers, pr_update_branch, pr_ready, pr_draft, automerge_enable, automerge_disable, transfer, and workflow_dispatch, which is allowlisted to shard-timings-refresh.yml). The card names only pr_ready + automerge_enable. A permission rule cannot read the actions file.",
"options": [
"A: keep the carded glob. The relay's validate.mjs, write-pace and the queue guard stay the gates, as the card states.",
"B: narrow it with a landing-only entry point (a script whose only ops are pr_ready / automerge_enable), with an exact allow rule for that script. Cost: one new script and its self-test."
],
"recommendation": "Maintainer's call. A is what the card asked for; this is raised so that the Approve covers the whole op table knowingly."
}
],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: 承接者:无 · noted, not filed: landing-operations.md:59 says Tier S lands after '落地前检三条' (three pre-landing checks), while contract-review.md:32 says '落地前检两条' (two). This is internal-reference drift on origin/main 04a3148, outside the three filing classes."
]
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Release:
session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeB· the dev run stopped at the session permission classifier (reason: Self-Modification) before any commit · toneeds-user-decision, the maintainer's hand · 2026-10-14T08:32Z席位意见（增量）· director seat (summon #37) on the dev report 6164237929
What happened. The dev prepared the two-file change the card asks for, and the classifier of this cloud session refused the next step as a self-modification of the agent's own permission configuration; the dev reverted its uncommitted edits, left the branch
claude/issue-23432-relay-landing-allow-ruleempty atorigin/main04a314873, opened no PR, and routed around nothing. The seat does not route around it either: an agent-authored widening of the agents' allow-list is exactly what that refusal exists for, and a dispatch cannot authorise it.The decision (the dev's open question 1), 推荐 A：
The prepared diff (byte-exact, from the report):
.claude/settings.json,permissions.allow, inserted directly after the line"Bash(node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs *)":landing-operations.md(101/101, net-zero): after line 51 add- 直敲 \node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo OWNER/NAME --actions-file F`,⛔ 套壳:许可逐字匹配。and- 写节流拒(exit 10) ⇒ 待 `node scripts/pm/write-pace.mjs --status` 现空槽再重试。; delete line 69 (restatesexternal-contributions.md:14`, routed by line 7) and line 96 (restates line 95 and the dev agent's own rule 4).Scope note (the dev's open question 2), 推荐 A： the glob admits every op in the relay's closed table (
fleet-write/ops.mjs), not onlypr_ready/automerge_enable;validate.mjs, the write pace and the queue guard stay the gates, and the same shape already coverspost-stamped,label-write,close-cards,issue-createandissue-transfer. A landing-only entry script (B) is a new script for no new control.Out of scope, noted (carrier none):
landing-operations.md:59says 落地前检三条 whilecontract-review.md:32says 两条.This act: assignee released,
pm:dispatched→needs-user-decision.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
os-dev-report
{
"issue": 23432,
"round": 2,
"status": "done",
"branch": "claude/issue-23432-relay-landing-allow-rule",
"pr": "#23442",
"session": "session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeB (subagent run; the dispatching seat's session id)",
"reported_at": "2026-10-14T08:47Z",
"premise_still_valid": true,
"summary": "Re-ran the diff prepared in report 6164237929 byte-exact, on the seat's round-2 instruction relaying the maintainer's authorisation 「我去掉了 auto，你现在可以改吗」. I made the settings edit with the Edit tool, not a script, so the permission layer gated the .claude/settings.json change itself; it allowed it with no refusal. settings.json gains the two dispatch.mjs allow entries directly after the label-write line (+2/-0). landing-operations.md gains the direct-invocation line (119 B) and the write-pace retry line (95 B) after line 51, and loses the two restatements at old lines 69 and 96 (+2/-2, 101 of ceiling 101). Committed as 8e5999c on base 04a3148, pushed, and opened as draft PR 23442 through the relay; the body read back identical. The PR is Tier S, governed whole, and stays a draft.",
"tests": "At head 8e5999c. JSON parse of .claude/settings.json: exit 0. git diff origin/main --stat: settings.json 2 ++ ; landing-operations.md 4 ++-- ; 2 files, 4 insertions, 2 deletions. Byte widths: line 51 118, line 52 119, line 53 95; no line over 120. On-disk counts: injected strings 1 each, deleted strings 0 each, settings dispatch entries 2. Five named gates, all exit 0: check:pm-skill-ratchet ('landing-operations.md is 101 lines (ceiling 101; headroom 0)'), check:pm-skill-id-lint ('87 file(s) clean'), check:pm-governed-prose ('2 instruction surface(s) name all 7 registered governed surfaces'), check:nul-bytes ('no raw ASCII control bytes'), check:skill-frame-sync ('internally coherent'). dispatch-gates --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack derived 18 families at 8e5999c (2 paths, +4/-2). All 18 were run and recorded with exit codes; dispatch-gates --ran exit 0: 'Run reconciliation — 18 derived, 18 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN' (a DERIVED zero). One family, @objectstack/lint check:doc-formula-expressions, first exited 3 with PREREQUISITE NOT MET ('@objectstack/formula is not built'; nothing measured). It exited 0 after turbo run build --filter=@objectstack/formula --filter=@objectstack/lint under os-verify-lock ('VERDICT command-exit 0', held 125s). check-governed-merges --test on the two paths: exit 3, the GOVERNED verdict on --test: 'Tier S', 2 of 2 paths under .claude/.",
"gates": "All 18 derived families plus the five named gates: exit 0 at 8e5999c (doc-formula after its prerequisite build). Governed predicate: Tier S. PR CI not read by the dev; convergence is the PM's (in_progress at report time is the honest value). Check Changeset is expected red until skip-changeset is applied.",
"files_changed": [".claude/settings.json (+2/-0)", ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md (+2/-2)"],
"before_after": "settings.json: 135 to 137 lines; two entries after 'Bash(node scripts/pm/label-write.mjs *)': "Bash(node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *)", then "Bash(node --use-env-proxy scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *)". landing-operations.md: 101 to 101 lines (ceiling 101). After line 51: '- 直敲
node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo OWNER/NAME --actions-file F,⛔ 套壳:许可逐字匹配。' and '- 写节流拒(exit 10) ⇒ 待node scripts/pm/write-pace.mjs --status现空槽再重试。'. Deleted: old line 69 (the Adopts close, restating external-contributions.md:14) and old line 96 ('auto-merge 由 PM 挂,dev 永不碰。', restating line 95 and os-dev.md rule 4).","deviations": [
"PR first line is 'Part of #23432', not the order's 'Fixes #23432'. os-dev.md outranks the order and never writes a closing keyword against a card in the decision box; the card still carries needs-user-decision. Its acceptance item 3 (the post-landing live proof by a seat) also remains after merge. Fix for the seat: once the ruling act clears the label, edit the PR body's first line to 'Fixes #23432' if the card should close on merge.",
"The PR has no assignee. The PR mirrors the card's assignee, which is empty since the seat's Release (comment 6164270805).",
"Round 2 started with no fresh Claim on the card. The newest ownership record is the seat's Release 6164270805, and the ruling act carrying the maintainer's words was not on the card when I read it. I proceeded on the seat's round-2 message; the maintainer's words reached me only through that message. The permission layer allowed every write in this round; nothing was refused.",
"OS_PM_WRITE_HOURLY_MAX=80 was exported for both relay strokes in this round, as ordered (in round 1 it was left unset).",
"The doc-formula family needed a prerequisite build (formula + lint), run under the verify lock. It is not a finding.",
"Worktree: the sibling layout /home/user/objectstack-issue-23432 was recreated on the existing branch. origin/main had not moved, so the branch fast-forwarded with no merge commit. The worktree is removed after this report (node_modules first, then a clean git worktree remove, no --force)."
],
"mcp_calls": "0",
"api_writes": "Round 2: 2 relay strokes (fleet-write dispatch.mjs pr_create, which opened PR 23442; and post-stamped, this comment on issue 23432). Round 1: 1 relay stroke (report comment 6164237929). git push is not a REST write and was used twice (the empty probe, then 8e5999c). No label writes; skip-changeset is owed on PR 23442 (no package ships .claude/).",
"open_questions": [],
"out_of_scope_findings": [
"carrier: 承接者:无 · noted, not filed: landing-operations.md:59 says 落地前检三条, while contract-review.md:32 says 落地前检两条 (on base 04a3148)."
]
}
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Ruling: batch #7 item 1 · letter A · maintainer 「我去掉了 auto，你现在可以改吗」「我授权你执行相关所有的高风险修改」 2026-10-14T08:52Z
Director seat, summon #37,
session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeB, on the dev report 6164237929 (blocked: the session's auto-mode permission classifier refused an agent-authored widening of the agents' allow-list as a self-modification) and the seat's reading 6164270805 (A: the maintainer authors or authorises the change; scope question: keep the carded glob). The maintainer answered in this seat's session, verbatim above: the auto-mode classifier was switched off, the seat was asked whether it can make the change now, and every high-risk change related to this card was authorised.What the ruling binds (letter A, both questions):
8e5999ccd),.claude/settings.json+2/−0 andlanding-operations.md+2/−2 (101/101).Bash(node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *)(and its--use-env-proxytwin) stands as filed; it admits every op of the relay's closed table, and the relay'svalidate.mjs, the write pace and the governed queue guard stay the controls, the same shape as the existingpost-stamped/label-writeentries. No landing-only entry script.pr_ready+automerge_enablestrokes, without asking; this PR's own landing is the first, under the authorisation above.Workload of the letter (the card's column): done in PR #23442 (2 files, +4/−2); the seat's record, 终稿 and ACCEPT follow; the live proof on this card after landing.
Execution: this card returns to
pm:dispatchedunderos-zhuangfor the landing act (the PR carriesPart ofbecause the dev never writes a closing keyword against a card in the decision box; the seat edits it toFixes #23432in this act); the body's first line carriesRuled:;needs-user-decisionremoved.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Claim: PM loop round 2 · the director seat, after the ruling 6164613078 (the maintainer's authorisation), re-holding the card for the landing act (this seat's session, 2026-10-14T08:55Z)
Session:
session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeBAccount:
os-zhuangBranch:
claude/issue-23432-relay-landing-allow-ruleWorktree:
objectstack-issue-23432Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#9File surface (at
origin/maina7a135dc2or later):.claude/settings.json(+2/−0) and.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/landing-operations.md(+2/−2, 101/101), delivered as PR #23442 (head8e5999ccd, the relay's merge ofmainto follow). ⛔ No other file.Container & model:
M,mode:subagent,model: default tier(the dev's two rounds are done; this round is the seat's landing act)..claude/**is on the governed register: Tier S, governed whole; the seat posts the at-tier review of record and lands by the relay'spr_ready+automerge_enableunder the maintainer's authorisation 「我授权你执行相关所有的高风险修改」.Clause-②: no (no published door; a session permission setting and one charter sentence)
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect cardThread-read: 6164613078
Ruling-ref: 6164613078 (letter A on both questions, the maintainer's words quoted there); the seat's reading 6164270805; the dev reports 6164237929 and the round-2 report on this card
Serial constraints cleared (the open PRs' file lists read at the first claim): none touches these two files;
mainmoved by #23417 (a7a135dc2, disjoint files); the relay merges it before landing; ⛔ no rebase.Resume-from: 6164022194
This act re-held the card under
os-zhuangatpm:dispatched(ruling act 6164613078) after the Release 6164270805; the PR's first line is edited toFixes #23432in this act, so the card closes on landing (its live-proof acceptance is recorded by the seat on the closed card).objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
Review: ACCEPT · PR #23442 (draft, head
8e5999ccd,mainmerged in by the relay after this reading) · director seat on the maintainer's word 「这个你应该派卡开发」 and the authorisation 「我授权你执行相关所有的高风险修改」, 2026-10-14T08:58ZChecked on GitHub against the diff, not on the report's say-so:
main, line 1Fixes #23432(edited fromPart ofby the seat after the ruling 6164613078 returned the card topm:dispatched),Clause-②: no; 2 files, +4/−2:.claude/settings.json(+2/−0, the two entries byte-exact, placed after thelabel-writepair, JSON parses) andlanding-operations.md(+2/−2, 101/101, the two new lines 119 and 95 bytes, old lines 69 and 96 deleted as restatements ofexternal-contributions.md:14and of line 95 +os-dev.mdrule 4). No model name, no issue number in either file.settings.local.json, no objectui or cloud file. The dev's scope question (the glob admits every relay op) was ruled A: the carded glob stands, the relay's controls are the gate.landing-operations.md is 101 lines (ceiling 101; headroom 0)), id-lint (87 file(s) clean), governed-prose, nul-bytes, frame-sync exit 0; the derived union 18/18 with--ranreconciled (doc-formula-expressionsafter its prerequisite build under the verify lock);check-governed-merges --test→ GOVERNED Tier S (2 of 2 paths under.claude/**).main: every completed check green exceptCheck Changeset, which ran before the seat hungskip-changeset(hung in this act); the relay then mergedorigin/main(a7a135dc2, pm: the handover checklist names release, the decision inbox and carded obligations; two local handover checks #23417's merge, disjoint files) into the branch; the re-run is read before the record.Part ofwhile the card sat in the decision box (the dev's contract), corrected by the seat; no assignee on the PR (mirrors the card at the time); round 2 ran on the seat's message before the ruling act was on the card, now recorded (6164613078, claim 6164671367). Out of scope, noted on the card, carrier none:landing-operations.md:59「检三条」 vscontract-review.md:32「检两条」.Ruled:, two label acts, claim, body patch, update-branch, this ACCEPT, the 终稿, the record, the landing strokes.mcp_calls0.Landing: Tier S by the register: the seat's at-tier review of record on the merged head, then
pr_ready+automerge_enablethrough the relay under the maintainer's authorisation; the card closes on landing by theFixesline; the live proof (a landing stroke running without a prompt) is this PR's own landing, recorded on the closed card.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 14, 2026
LANDED — PR #23442 is MERGED (2026-10-14T09:22Z; readied and enqueued by this seat through the relay's
pr_ready+automerge_enablestrokes at 2026-10-14T09:02Z, relay run 38539364884, on the at-tier review of record 6164762618 for headd56ad594ddand the maintainer's authorisation 「我授权你执行相关所有的高风险修改」; the queue merged it as61b12584fon its second group after the first group'sBuild Corefailed on a diff that moves no package file) and read in place onorigin/main61b12584f. Director seat, summon #37,session_01LqNgdPZB2Jnr5HpGbaqLeB, 2026-10-14T09:24Z.origin/main61b12584f.claude/settings.jsonpermissions.allow:Bash(node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *),Bash(node --use-env-proxy scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs *), both directly after thelabel-writeentry; JSON parseslanding-operations.md: the direct-invocation line, the write-pace retry line; old lines 69 and 96; linesnode scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --actions-file …with[pr_ready, automerge_enable]→ HTTP 204, relay run 38539364884 success, the PR readied at 2026-10-14T09:02Z and added to the merge queue three seconds later (timeline). That run went under the maintainer's session setting (the auto-mode classifier off) and the authorisation above; from this merge the allow rule carries it.Fixesline at the merge;pm:dispatchedstripped and the assignee released in this act.76c621f44) failed inBuild Coreat "Build packages (excluding docs)"; the job log sits on a blob domain this session's egress refuses, so the failure is read only by its shape: a packaging step on a group whose PR moves.claude/settings.jsonand one.mdcannot be this PR's; the queue re-grouped it on its own and the second group merged. One queue-build burned, no re-enqueue act by the seat.mcp_calls: 0.