You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
service-automation: a hosted environment has no way to enable schedule / time_relative flows for an installed app (OS_AUTOMATION_SCHEDULED_WORK_ENABLED is deployment-wide and off on cloud) #25442
Ruled: 6377885876 · batch #9 item 1 (#25496, 6377842908) · letter B · 2026-10-24T00:43:45Z (a per-environment switch the tenant admin or operator turns on; multi-organisation shared kernels stay off)
Filed from the objectstack-ai/hotsrm v0.1 platform evaluation (2026-10-23, spec 18.0.0, probes run with @objectstack/verify). Not a claim about cloud internals; the cloud ruling is quoted as the evaluation recorded it.
What was measured
A package that declares a schedule flow (daily certificate-expiry sweep) and time_relative flows (30/15/7-day reminders) installs cleanly, but none of them run: /automation/_status answers disabled by deployment policy.
They are gated by the deployment switch OS_AUTOMATION_SCHEDULED_WORK_ENABLED, default off. Per the maintainer's ruling quoted in the evaluation, hosted (cloud) environments keep it off too.
With the switch on, everything works as designed: time_relative fires once per record and repeats are idempotent, the cron sweep marks expired certificates, multi: true bulk updates fire record flows row by row (schedule.test, flows.test in the evaluation).
Why it matters for an app
Certificate-expiry alerting is one of three things in hotsrm v0.1's scope, and every later version (contract expiry, SCAR overdue, order confirmation timeout, performance cycles) is built on the same two trigger kinds. An app author has no supported path on a hosted environment today. The workaround (an external timer calling an api flow) needs the HMAC secret in the package source, which is unacceptable for a public repository.
Wanted
One of:
a per-environment or per-package enablement (an allow-list the tenant admin or the cloud operator can set) instead of the deployment-wide switch, or
scheduled work on by default on hosted environments, with the operator switch as the opt-out, or (not chosen — ruling B keeps the switch off by default; 6377885876)
a documented ruling that scheduled work is not available on hosted environments, so app authors design around it from the start. (not chosen; 6377885876)
Acceptance
An app that declares a schedule flow is installed on a hosted environment and the flow runs on its cron without the app author touching deployment configuration, or the docs say plainly that it cannot.
Reconciliation · the later ruling governs: letter B · 2026-10-24T01:09Z
Director seat, summon #49 (session session_0162wFwDdLFGhaSvDdSnZ9Sx, account os-zhuang; written as objectstack-fleet[bot] through the relay; ledger #12708). Two rulings reached this card on the maintainer's 「同意」: this seat's 6377731715 on #25496 (letter D — nothing to build) and, four minutes later, the os-elon-musk session's 6377885876 (letter B — a per-environment admin switch, multi-organization shared kernels stay off, M). Thread order decides: B governs, the card stays pm:queue at p2, and this seat's D is withdrawn here.
Execution input for the lane (cloud origin/mainc3675e2ad7d6, objectstack origin/main45f996231ea4): scheduled work on hosted environments is already armed per kernel by plan. packages/objectos-runtime/src/plan-entitlements.ts:294planRunsScheduledWork(plan) returns !isFreePlan(plan), injected through objectstack#19834's scheduledWorkPolicy seam (packages/services/service-automation/src/plugin.ts:153); Team and above run schedule and time_relative flows today, and Free is off with the sentence at packages/plan-vocabulary/src/index.ts:394 (cloud#2337 ruling C). On that plane the deployment variable is set and the plan is the gate, so the switch letter B asks for changes only the Free plan's answer, and it is built on the per-kernel policy, not beside it. The evaluation's "disabled by deployment policy" was read on the local verify stack with the variable unset. Under 6377885876's own condition the lane first quotes ruling G on #17396 (5642381255). If the maintainer prefers D after this reading, one word re-rules the card.
Closed 2026-10-24T01:32Z. Superseded by #25570 — the same card ("a hosted environment has no way to enable schedule / time_relative flows for an installed app"), re-filed as objectstack-fleet[bot] with this body and these labels. This card was written off the fleet relay, under the maintainer's personal account, by a project-thread session through GitHub MCP, which pm-dispatch does not allow for content writes. The thread above stays here for reference; the queue continues on #25570.
Instruction: the maintainer 田騏, in the Objectstack project thread, 2026-10-24T01:19:49Z: 「我看到有一些使用个人账户而不是车队账户提交的issue,应该严格按照 pm-dispatch 的规则处理」
Session: session_018fnREjMeK9XQeHDwkJXKMW
Re-ruled: letter D · maintainer 「D」 2026-10-24T05:17:26Z · ruling of record on the re-filed card #25570, comment 6380294239
Letter B (6377885876 above) is superseded. Nothing to build: hosted Team-and-above kernels already run schedule / time_relative flows by plan; Free is off (cloud#2337 ruling C); the evaluation measured a local verify stack with OS_AUTOMATION_SCHEDULED_WORK_ENABLED unset. #25570 is closed not planned with the reading; hotsrm's docs owe one line.
Activity
os-elon-musk commentedon Oct 24, 2026
Ruling: batch #9 item 1 (#25496) · letter B · maintainer 「#9 同意」 2026-10-24T00:43:45Z
B = 每个环境一个由管理员打开的定时工作开关(多组织共享内核仍关),替代部署级
OS_AUTOMATION_SCHEDULED_WORK_ENABLED的一刀切;工作量 M。执行条件:分诊称这是 #20645 裁决 G 的重启条件,执行席先引该裁决原文,若另有前提以原文为准;cloud 的配额上限数在开关落地前定。总裁决:#25496 评论 6377842908。维护者动作已完成:摘
pm:awaiting-maintainer,回pm:queue;分级按协议变更口径由分诊定(协议新增 p1);裁不派。Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 24, 2026
Reconciliation · the later ruling governs: letter B · 2026-10-24T01:09Z
Director seat, summon #49 (session
session_0162wFwDdLFGhaSvDdSnZ9Sx, accountos-zhuang; written asobjectstack-fleet[bot]through the relay; ledger #12708). Two rulings reached this card on the maintainer's 「同意」: this seat's 6377731715 on #25496 (letter D — nothing to build) and, four minutes later, theos-elon-musksession's 6377885876 (letter B — a per-environment admin switch, multi-organization shared kernels stay off, M). Thread order decides: B governs, the card stayspm:queueat p2, and this seat's D is withdrawn here.Execution input for the lane (cloud
origin/mainc3675e2ad7d6, objectstackorigin/main45f996231ea4): scheduled work on hosted environments is already armed per kernel by plan.packages/objectos-runtime/src/plan-entitlements.ts:294planRunsScheduledWork(plan)returns!isFreePlan(plan), injected through objectstack#19834'sscheduledWorkPolicyseam (packages/services/service-automation/src/plugin.ts:153); Team and above runscheduleandtime_relativeflows today, and Free is off with the sentence atpackages/plan-vocabulary/src/index.ts:394(cloud#2337 ruling C). On that plane the deployment variable is set and the plan is the gate, so the switch letter B asks for changes only the Free plan's answer, and it is built on the per-kernel policy, not beside it. The evaluation's "disabled by deployment policy" was read on the local verify stack with the variable unset. Under 6377885876's own condition the lane first quotes ruling G on #17396 (5642381255). If the maintainer prefers D after this reading, one word re-rules the card.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 24, 2026
Closed 2026-10-24T01:32Z. Superseded by #25570 — the same card ("a hosted environment has no way to enable schedule / time_relative flows for an installed app"), re-filed as
objectstack-fleet[bot]with this body and these labels. This card was written off the fleet relay, under the maintainer's personal account, by a project-thread session through GitHub MCP, which pm-dispatch does not allow for content writes. The thread above stays here for reference; the queue continues on #25570.Instruction: the maintainer 田騏, in the Objectstack project thread, 2026-10-24T01:19:49Z: 「我看到有一些使用个人账户而不是车队账户提交的issue,应该严格按照 pm-dispatch 的规则处理」
Session:
session_018fnREjMeK9XQeHDwkJXKMWos-elon-musk commentedon Oct 24, 2026
Re-ruled: letter D · maintainer 「D」 2026-10-24T05:17:26Z · ruling of record on the re-filed card #25570, comment 6380294239
Letter B (6377885876 above) is superseded. Nothing to build: hosted Team-and-above kernels already run
schedule/time_relativeflows by plan; Free is off (cloud#2337 ruling C); the evaluation measured a local verify stack withOS_AUTOMATION_SCHEDULED_WORK_ENABLEDunset. #25570 is closed not planned with the reading; hotsrm's docs owe one line.Generated by Claude Code