Skip to content

pm-dispatch: cloud work found during development (dev open_questions, out-of-scope findings, seat findings) is filed as a cloud-lane card #26121

Closed

Description

@objectstack-fleet

Filing gate: ③ 维护者直派(改 pm 规则,维护者点名)。维护者 Leehom 在本项目时间线的原话,逐字不译:

  • 2026-10-26T12:40Z 「需要转给 cloud的,应该立 cloud 车道卡」
  • 2026-10-26T12:51Z 「需要转给 cloud的,应该立 cloud 车道卡,应该立卡写入 skills」
  • 2026-10-26T12:52Z 「开发中涉及 cloud 车道的,也应该转给 cloud」

Business reason: ③,以原话代。
Reader who acts: the domain:skills seat (next shift). It changes .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**. The expected home is references/cross-repo-coordination.md L50–51 (the split-by-repo rule for unreachable repos). A pointer goes in the dev-report handling the seat reads at review: .claude/agents/os-dev.md open_questions / out_of_scope_findings, or references/execution-duties.md. One home, the others point to it.
Dedupe: domain:skills open + closed (308 cards) title grep "cloud" → 10 hits. The nearest is #24591 (closed): ruling D「这一类的卡片能否直接把 cloud 部分分拆成一个 cloud 车道的卡片」「如果没有办法分拆,就立一张 cloud 车道的前置卡」, landed as cross-repo-coordination.md L50–51. That rule covers splitting a card at filing or first touch. It does NOT cover cloud work that surfaces during development. No card asks for this one.

What changes

  • Today: L50–51 split a cross-repo card at filing or first touch (the cloud part is filed by a seat that can reach cloud, or parked as domain:cloud + status:parked).
  • New: anything that touches the cloud lane and is found during development also becomes a cloud-lane card. That covers the os-dev-report's open_questions and out_of_scope_findings and seat findings at review or landing. ⛔ It must not be noted-and-dropped, folded into the objectstack PR, or left as a carrier: none line.
  • Card shape, from the precedent below: domain:cloud + status:parked + repo:cloud, a provenance line naming the objectstack card / PR it came from, and a one-line executable criterion. The objectstack card keeps only its own work and records Blocked-by: when it depends on the cloud card.

Precedent (server seat 2, 2026-10-26)

Boundary

  • Ratchet: each touched file is at its line ceiling, so new lines are paid in-file. ⛔ No ceiling raise.
  • ⛔ No new gate or script. ⛔ No change to cloud's own PM.
  • Tier S (.claude/**). If os-dev.md is touched, check its own tier with dispatch-gates --tier.

Session: session_014FZ3TJucS1L7BdMe5DAzXC (domain:skills#1, filing only; the lane is off shift)

Activity

  1. added
    toolingFix lands in tooling, not a product package — enters pm:queue only with Unblocks: or a named surface
    domain:skillsDomain lane — seat card indexed by label:pm:seat
    area:devpathThe road — create, dev, verify, publish/install, connect an agent, iterate
    on Oct 26, 2026
  2. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Triage: first grade — tooling · priority:p2 · domain:skills · area:devpath · pm:queue · triage seat · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-26T13:03Z

    ⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.

    • The maintainer's rule (Leehom 12:40–12:52Z: 「需要转给 cloud的,应该立 cloud 车道卡」「开发中涉及 cloud 车道的,也应该转给 cloud」). It is not reopened here. Give it one home (cross-repo-coordination.md) with pointers from os-dev.md and execution-duties.md. Triage already follows it (objectstack-ai/cloud#3290 and objectstack-ai/cloud#3292 today).

    Generated by Claude Code

  3. added
    pm:queueReady for the PM dispatch loop
    pm:dispatchedDispatched to a dev agent by /pm-dispatch
    and removed
    pm:queueReady for the PM dispatch loop
    on Oct 26, 2026
  4. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Claim: PM loop round 1 (fifth wave) · 2026-10-26T18:25Z
    Session: session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn (seat; implementation by an in-session os-dev subagent)
    Account: os-warren (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
    Branch: claude/project-thread-1r3slx (the seat thread's harness push branch — the measured platform exception to claude/issue-N-slug; reset to origin/main e05e0de8 after PR #26254 merged and the remote branch was deleted)
    Worktree: objectstack-issue-26121 in the seat's clone
    Domain: domain:skills
    Seat: domain:skills#2 (seat post #19287)
    File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md (the home: the rule that cloud-lane work found during development is filed as a cloud-lane card, beside the split-by-repo rule), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md (one pointer line at the dev-report handling, paid by the headroom the cap deletion freed), .claude/agents/os-dev.md (only if a ≤120-byte in-place fold exists on the out_of_scope_findings / carrier: lines; at its ceiling, ⛔ no line added there), .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md only if a fold on the 报告契约 line that already says 「三类由席位立在修复仓」 fits in 120 bytes (at its ceiling). (stop on breach; explain in the report)
    Container & model: S, mode:subagent (in-session), model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (dispatch-gates --tier: MANDATORY — .claude/agents/os-dev.md is in the surface, clause ①), effort: xhigh. In-session rather than a card thread because the thread form sets the model only on the maintainer's words and this surface mandates the ceiling tier. Governed .claude/**, Tier S: one independent CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review of record by an agent other than the drafter, then the seat lands through the queue (AGENTS.md Prime Directive 14; the maintainer's standing word in the seat thread 2026-10-26 13:04Z: 「你按照 pm-dispatch 技能审核的pr都可以落地」).
    Clause-②: no
    Metadata-protocol: none
    Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ③; the card body quotes maintainer Leehom verbatim: 「需要转给 cloud的,应该立 cloud 车道卡,应该立卡写入 skills」「开发中涉及 cloud 车道的,也应该转给 cloud」)
    Thread-read: 6416677493
    Premise: holds — on origin/main: cross-repo-coordination.md:46–47 carry only the filing/first-touch split (「跨不可达仓的卡立卡或首触按仓拆…」), nothing on work found during development; the file is 47 lines under ceiling 51 (headroom 4 — the card's 「each touched file is at its line ceiling」 is wrong for this file, right for os-dev.md 404/404 and SKILL.md 319/319); execution-duties.md reads 187 under ceiling 188 once the cap PR is on main. The precedent cards the body names carry domain:cloud + status:parked + repo:cloud and live in this repo.
    Serial constraints cleared: the tooling-cap PR (same execution-duties.md) MERGED before this claim; no other open PR touches .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** or .claude/agents/os-dev.md. The sibling card on review depth (same SKILL.md, at ceiling) has no triage first grade yet and is not a candidate; it waits.


    Generated by Claude Code

  5. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    os-dev-report

    {
      "issue": 26121,
      "status": "done",
      "branch": "claude/project-thread-1r3slx",
      "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26286",
      "session": "session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn",
      "premise_still_valid": true,
      "summary": "The maintainer's rule that cloud-lane work found during development becomes a cloud-lane card now has one home and two pointers. Home: two rule lines after the split-by-repo pair in references/cross-repo-coordination.md (the seat files it from the dev report's open_questions/out_of_scope_findings and from review/landing findings; never noted-and-dropped, folded into this repo's PR or left as carrier: none; the parked card adds repo:cloud, a provenance line and a one-line criterion). Pointers: one line in execution-duties.md 〈复核〉 beside the review-checklist line, and an in-place respelling of os-dev.md's carrier: line so a cloud-touching finding writes carrier: cloud. SKILL.md untouched. Draft PR 26286, Tier S, skip-changeset, assignee os-warren; the seat reviews at CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER and lands it.",
      "tests": "none owed: the diff is rule text in .claude/** only, no package touched, so no build closure, package test or ablation applies; the gate battery below is the evidence, run on the final tree ff37d61c (working tree clean). Per-line byte widths verified by script: every new or respelled line is 114-119 B under the 120 B cap; control-byte scan over the three files: no hit; issue-number grep over the new lines: no hit.",
      "gates": "derived with node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack (no paths) at ff37d61c: 20 commands, each run locally with the exit code captured before any pipe, all exit 0: check-closing-keyword-parity (+ --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, check-governed-queue-guard --self-test, check-harness-current --self-test, lint check:doc-formula-expressions, check:agent-model-declared, check:agent-test-spelling, check:commit-card-trailers, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:nul-bytes, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:refd-timer-probe, check:skill-frame-sync, check:watch-hint-literal; plus the local-only check:skill-frame-freshness exit 0 (1/1 framework files byte-identical to the ref). --ran reconciliation verbatim: '✓ dispatch-gates --ran: 20 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 20 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED (a DERIVED zero — all 20 recorded an exit code and none of them is 3).' Ratchet verdict lines: cross-repo-coordination.md is 47 lines (ceiling 47; headroom 0); execution-duties.md is 188 lines (ceiling 188; headroom 0); os-dev.md is 404 lines (ceiling 404; headroom 0); SKILL.md is 319 lines (ceiling 319; headroom 0). Earlier readings for the record: the first battery (before the ceiling payment) read cross-repo-coordination.md at 49/47 (exit 1) and check:doc-formula-expressions exit 3 (PREREQUISITE NOT MET, formula and lint not built); after building those two under the verify lock (VERDICT command-exit 0, held 111s) it reads exit 0. CI check-runs on the PR: not waited for, in_progress at report time; the seat reads them.",
      "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
      "mcp_calls": "0 — no MCP GitHub call of any kind; reads were REST GET via curl (issue 26121 + comments, issues 26108/26110, pull 26286 read-back)",
      "api_writes": "2 — (1) relay pr_create stroke via scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs, run 40381962869 success, which fanned to POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pulls, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26286/assignees, POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26286/labels (read-back: 11048 bytes sent, 11048 stored, identical; assignee os-warren); (2) this report comment via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26121 (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26121/comments). git push x2 (not REST writes).",
      "deviations": [
        "PM mechanism hypothesis 1 falsified: cross-repo-coordination.md's CEILINGS row is 47, not 51 (the script's row comment: lowered 51 → 47 when objectui stopped being a sister repo), so the file was at its ceiling and the two home lines were paid in-file: the reader-and-moment intro line (old L3, 103 B) and its blank line (old L4) retired, home SKILL.md 阶段细则索引 row for the file (same reader and moment verbatim). Surfaced by the first ratchet run going red at 49/47.",
        "Branch is the seat's harness push branch claude/project-thread-1r3slx (the measured platform exception the claim names), not claude/issue-N-slug; pushed with git push -u as the dispatch directed, no force; two commits (the rule change, then the ceiling payment), both with the model-free trailer pair.",
        "The dispatch log I tailed carried fleet-write's own re-exec notice naming the value of HTTPS_PROXY (a local proxy address); no other environment value was printed and none was typed by me.",
        "No worktree-creating flags from os-dev.md rule 1 (--no-track/-b) were used: the worktree was added on the existing local branch and fast-forwarded to origin/main, as the dispatch spelled it.",
        "SKILL.md's 阶段细则索引 row for cross-repo-coordination.md still names only the triage and execution-seat cross-repo moments; the review moment reaches the home through the new execution-duties.md line. Widening that row was outside the declared file surface, so not done."
      ],
      "files_changed": [
        ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md",
        ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md",
        ".claude/agents/os-dev.md"
      ],
      "line_budget": {
        ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/cross-repo-coordination.md": {
          "before": 47,
          "after": 47,
          "ceiling": 47,
          "touched_lines": {
            "-L3 (intro, retired)": "103 B",
            "-L4 (blank)": "0 B",
            "+L46 开发中涉 cloud 车道者由席位同拆…": "118 B",
            "+L47 ⛔ 不记而弃…停放卡加 repo:cloud…": "118 B"
          }
        },
        ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/execution-duties.md": {
          "before": 187,
          "after": 188,
          "ceiling": 188,
          "touched_lines": {
            "+L178 报告 open_questions/out_of_scope_findings 涉 cloud 车道者,按 cross-repo-coordination.md 立 cloud 卡": "119 B"
          }
        },
        ".claude/agents/os-dev.md": {
          "before": 404,
          "after": 404,
          "ceiling": 404,
          "touched_lines": {
            "L52 carrier: rule, respelled in place": "120 B → 114 B"
          }
        },
        ".claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md": {
          "before": 319,
          "after": 319,
          "ceiling": 319,
          "touched_lines": {},
          "note": "L283 报告契约 hook is 117 B; folds keeping its content measure 124/134/141 B, over the 120 B cap, so untouched"
        }
      },
      "rules_retired": [
        {
          "clause": "cross-repo-coordination.md old L3: 分诊席每次 fire 路由与查重前读本文;执行席跨仓认领、派发或转移时读本文。",
          "now_lives": "SKILL.md 阶段细则索引 table row for references/cross-repo-coordination.md (分诊席路由与查重前;执行席跨仓认领、派发或转移时), the index SKILL.md names as where each phase file's readers live"
        },
        {
          "clause": "os-dev.md L52 respellings, no clause deleted: 「⛔ 非下个碰 X 的 PR」→「⛔ 非下个 PR」(full lesson stays in filing-gate.md L19); 「无则「承接者:无」」→「无则 `none`」(the key value the card and the JSON template spell); 「皆无 ⇒ 只进 Acceptance notes」→「皆无只进该节」(该节 = L51's ## Acceptance notes)",
          "now_lives": "same line, shorter spelling; the seat-side twin SKILL.md L282 keeps 皆无 ⇒ Acceptance notes verbatim"
        }
      ],
      "open_questions": [],
      "out_of_scope_findings": [
        "class: none (protocol observation, not a defect) · the SKILL.md 阶段细则索引 row for cross-repo-coordination.md could also name the review moment now that the file is read at review; outside the declared file surface · carrier: the domain:skills seat, at its discretion · dedupe words: 阶段细则索引, cross-repo-coordination, 复核, cloud"
      ]
    }

    Generated by Claude Code

  6. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    ACCEPT → PR #26286 comment 6425086033 · domain:skills#2 · 2026-10-26T19:15Z
    Contract review (CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS on ff37d61c) → PR #26286 comment 6425062560. Tier S: the seat readies and arms the PR through the relay on this record.


    Generated by Claude Code

  7. objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 26, 2026

    @objectstack-fleet
    ContributorAuthor

    Landed · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-26T20:12Z

    probe reading
    PR #26286 merged: true at 2026-10-26T20:10:35Z, merge commit d3bdf43b
    origin/main git log origin/main --grep=26286 answers d3bdf43b; cross-repo-coordination.md:46–47 read 「开发中涉 cloud 车道者由席位同拆:…」「⛔ 不记而弃、不并入本仓 PR、不留 carrier: none;停放卡加 repo:cloud,出处行与一行判据。」; os-dev.md:52 reads 「…涉 cloud 写 carrier: cloud…」; execution-duties.md carries the 复核 pointer
    merge queue no gh-readonly-queue/main/pr-26286-* ref remains

    Landing path: Tier S on the independent ## Contract review (PR comment 6425062560, CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER, PASS on ff37d61c) and the seat's ACCEPT (6425086033); readied and armed through the relay at 2026-10-26T19:16Z on the maintainer's standing word in the seat thread.

    State: the card closed as completed through Fixes #26121; pm:dispatched removed in this act (the domain, area, type and priority labels stay). The body of #26286 closes no other card. The rule is live: cloud-lane work surfacing during development is filed by the seat as a cloud-lane card in the precedents' shape; the dev marks it carrier: cloud.

    Carrier, not filed — 收班简报 items: the SKILL.md 阶段细则索引 row for cross-repo-coordination.md does not yet name the review moment; SKILL.md 「domain:* 只由分诊产出,两例外」 does not list the parked split the home already practises; fleet-write's re-exec notice prints the proxy address from an environment variable into the local log.


    Generated by Claude Code

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

area:devpathThe road — create, dev, verify, publish/install, connect an agent, iteratedomain:skillsDomain lane — seat card indexed by label:pm:seatpriority:p2Medium: important, M3toolingFix lands in tooling, not a product package — enters pm:queue only with Unblocks: or a named surface

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions