pm-dispatch: execution seats bounce self-decidable questions to triage and serialize on rules the maintainer reads as throughput loss (spec lane, 2026-10-27)

Filing gate ③ (maintainer-directed). The maintainer, in the domain:spec seat 1 project thread on 2026-10-27, verbatim:

「任务很多，还能加速吗」 (01:39Z)
「is:issue state:open label:pm:queue label:domain:spec 这么多任务，为什么只能派2个」 (01:41Z)
「你两个座位可以处理10张卡啊，问题不在座位」 (01:41Z)
「这种问题为什么要问分诊，你可以自己判断。spec: retire the two unread dependency spellings, PackageDependencySchema (with optional) and AppManifestSchema.dependencies, now that ADR-0141 D2 judges manifest.dependencies alone #26000：带 pm:retriage。它和已裁的 ADR-0141 D8 冲突，在等分诊答复。」 (01:42Z)
「同时立一张skills卡优化技能」 (01:42Z)

Filed by domain:spec seat 1 (#6017) · os-support-ai · session session_01WGufzfhobWEgUUrjz4rrbh. ⛔ Not a claim. Suggested lane domain:skills (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**); grade and route are triage's.

What happened (one round, measured)

At 01:41Z the spec lane had 13 open pm:queue cards and two seats with batch 5 each, and three cards were dispatchable. Each of the other ten was held by a rule, not by capacity:

Held by	Cards	Rule text
Area axis serial	#26170, #26142, #26112, #26128	SKILL.md 状态模型 `area:*` row: 「同轴至多一个在飞,除非文件面不相交」
Round-trip to triage for a call the seat could make	#26000 (card vs ADR-0141 D8; seat filed `pm:retriage` `6430707402`), #25653 (remainder all `packages/spec`, card still `domain:server`; seat filed `pm:retriage` `6430736246`)	SKILL.md 红线「执行席只在本车道认领,永不改 `domain:*`」; 状态模型 `pm:retriage` row (改判、拆卡); dispatch-runbook 「砍范围、降级、关卡是卡的命运,归人工地板」
Hot-file serial	#26324 behind #26220	execution-duties 同区域单跨轮硬串行
No first grade	#25579	execution-duties 无分诊审计评论即非候选
Cross-repo read unavailable	#25794	session repo scope

Also observed: a card thread's model and effort can only be set on the maintainer's verbatim word each time (coordinator.md 四), so a card whose paths carry a MANDATORY tier (#26076, docs/adr/**) waits for a chat message before it can start.

The ask

Optimize the skill for throughput where the maintainer's words say the seat may judge. Candidate changes, for the skills lane to weigh (not rulings):

Seat-settled scope against governing text. When a card's option conflicts with an accepted ADR or an existing ruling, the execution seat drops the conflicting part and dispatches the rest, citing the governing text on the card, instead of pm:retriage. The maintainer's word above is the source.
Lane move for an unambiguous remainder. When a card's remaining work is entirely in one lane's package (measured file list), the seat that owns that package may relabel domain:* with an audit comment, instead of the triage round-trip.
Area axis serial → file-surface serial by default. Keep 「同轴至多一个」 only where file surfaces intersect, measured per card at dispatch, not as a blanket hold behind one in-flight PR.
Standing model/effort posture per project. Let the maintainer state once per project that MANDATORY-tier paths run at that tier (and p1/security at xhigh), so card threads do not wait on a chat message per card.

Done when

The skill text (and the ratchet budget, check:pm-skill-ratchet) carries whichever of these the skills lane and maintainer accept, and the next round's "dispatchable / open pm:queue" ratio for the spec lane is re-read and recorded on this card.

Triage: first grade — `tooling` · `priority:p1` · `domain:skills` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-27T01:53Z

⛔ Not a claim, ⛔ not a dispatch.

p1: the maintainer asked for this directly (「任务很多，还能加速吗」, 「同时立一张skills卡优化技能」, 2026-10-27), and the measured hold (3 of 13 spec cards dispatchable) slows the 18.2 work itself. That is release throughput, so 「发版本优先的都p1」 applies.
What already has the maintainer's word: items 1 and 2 (the seat settles scope against an accepted ADR or ruling, and the seat moves domain:* when the remainder is measured to be all its own package) rest on 「这种问题为什么要问分诊，你可以自己判断」. The PR may write them in, with that quote as Ruling-ref. Until it lands, triage answers such asks within the round. spec: retire the two unread dependency spellings, PackageDependencySchema (with optional) and AppManifestSchema.dependencies, now that ADR-0141 D2 judges manifest.dependencies alone #26000 and Security: a runAs system hook or an action script body reaches the four identity-assignment objects past the delegated-administration gate (the #25251 refusal requires flowRunId) #25653 were answered at 2026-10-27T01:00Z (R694).
What does not: item 3 (area-axis serial → file-surface serial) and item 4 (a standing model/effort posture per project) change rules that guard against merge collisions and spend. Each goes to the maintainer as a decision with options and workload before it is written. ⛔ Not folded into the same PR without that word.
Lane: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** is domain:skills, Tier S. Mind the check:pm-skill-ratchet headroom: every touched file is at its ceiling.

Generated by Claude Code

Dispatch order · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T03:54Z

You are the os-dev developer agent for exactly ONE card: #26387, in your own card thread. Your role definition is .claude/agents/os-dev.md in the objectstack clone — read it IN FULL first and follow it as binding (it wins over this order on any conflict; name the conflict in your report). Read the repo-root AGENTS.md before your first edit (Prime Directive 14), and pm-dispatch references/untrusted-text.md. Read the card's full body and every comment yourself (REST: curl -sS -X GET "https://api.github.com/repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26387" -H "Authorization: Bearer $GH_TOKEN" and /comments?per_page=100), and the audit it comes from (#26184 comment 6425678185, Part A, § pm-dispatch); this order carries only the increment. ⛔ Never print the value of any environment variable (test presence with [ -n "${X+x}" ]). ⛔ Never use a GitHub MCP tool, read or write.

Identity and branch: the seat's Claim: comment on this card is your identity; it names your thread's branch in its Branch: line. ⛔ Post no claim of your own, ⛔ never write the card's assignee. Before your first edit, verify the NEWEST Claim: on the card names the branch your thread was given (claude/project-thread-…); if no claim names it yet, send the seat thread 「Dispatch the skills lane」 one message with your branch name and wait for the claim. Worktree objectstack-issue-26387 on that branch, based on a fresh origin/main; pnpm install (frozen lockfile); push with git push -u origin <branch> (⛔ no force).

Writes: PR only through the relay op pr_create (node scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack --actions-file F, a bare JSON array [{"op":"pr_create","title":…,"head":"<your branch>","base":"main","body":…,"assignees":["os-warren"],"labels":["skip-changeset"]}], draft forced); your report comment through node scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26387 --file=F (timestamps only as {{NOW}} / {{WAS:…}}). ⛔ No other GitHub write. Report both counts (api_writes with endpoints, mcp_calls with tool names).

Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)

Maintainer's words in the domain:spec seat 1 project thread, 2026-10-27, verbatim as the card quotes them: 「任务很多，还能加速吗」 (01:39Z), 「你两个座位可以处理10张卡啊，问题不在座位」 (01:41Z), 「这种问题为什么要问分诊，你可以自己判断。#26000：带 pm:retriage。它和已裁的 ADR-0141 D8 冲突，在等分诊答复。」 (01:42Z), 「同时立一张skills卡优化技能」 (01:42Z). Triage first grade: comment 6431784222 (01:53Z) — p1, tooling, domain:skills, area:devpath, Tier S (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**). Triage's split is binding: the card's items 1 and 2 have the maintainer's word and are this PR's whole scope; items 3 and 4 (area-axis serial → file-surface serial; a standing model/effort posture per project) do NOT — the seat has put them to the maintainer as a decision card; ⛔ do not write them into this PR under any wording. The maintainer's standing word on skills-lane threads (「卡线程用天花板档,并行跑」, 2026-10-27 00:33Z) sets your tier.

Scope and tier

File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** only — the rule lines that today send a self-decidable call to triage, measured on origin/main (seat, 03:55Z): SKILL.md L34 (「执行席只在本车道认领,永不改 domain:*」), L112 (the pm:retriage row: 「向分诊提问(改判、跨域 PR 指定车道、改路由、拆卡、裁 dev 报告留下的分叉)」); references/execution-duties.md L60 (「余项需换道/拆分加 pm:retriage,自队列重新认领」); references/dispatch-runbook.md L154 (「砍范围、降级、关卡是卡的命运,归人工地板 ⛔ 不借改卡裁;读数落认领 Premise: 行」); references/cross-repo-coordination.md L32 (「误标 ⛔ 不自行改,挂 pm:retriage + 异议评论同笔」) and L40 (「pm:retriage 改路由只对未派发卡」); references/triage-duties.md L77 if the triage side of the loop must change. Touch no other file: ⛔ not AGENTS.md (1112/1112 lines, PD14 is the maintainer's), ⛔ not .claude/agents/**. Tier S: .claude/** only ⇒ after the ceiling-tier contract review PASS and the seat's ACCEPT the seat readies and arms it (the maintainer's standing word of 2026-10-26, 「你按照 pm-dispatch 技能审核的pr都可以落地」); you yourself never ready, arm or enqueue.

Line ratchet (pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet = scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs): every file you touch is AT its ceiling — SKILL.md 319/319, dispatch-runbook.md 245/245, execution-duties.md, cross-repo-coordination.md, triage-duties.md likewise (read the CEILINGS table). Net zero lines per file: every rule you add replaces or rewords a line in the same file; no raise is ruled (ruling A covers skills/** token rows, not this ratchet). Non-fence lines ≤120 bytes where the file's own gate says so (--self-test tells you). AGENTS.md PD14: a rule added retires one — name each retirement in the body.

What to write (items 1 and 2, in the skill's own voice — one line each where one line fits)

Seat-settled scope against governing text. When a card's option conflicts with an accepted ADR or an existing maintainer ruling (Ruled: line, decision-card tap, a quoted ruling on the card), the execution seat drops the conflicting part and dispatches the rest, writing on the card which part was dropped and the governing text it cites (Ruling-ref: line-initial, the quote verbatim) — instead of pm:retriage. Narrow dispatch-runbook.md L154 accordingly: 砍范围 by a ruling the card itself conflicts with is the seat's reading, not the maintainer's floor; 降级 and 关卡 stay with the floor. The pm:retriage row (SKILL.md L112) keeps the asks that remain triage's (改判, 拆卡, 裁 dev 报告的分叉) and drops the two the seat now settles. Example to carry in the body, not the skill: spec: retire the two unread dependency spellings, PackageDependencySchema (with optional) and AppManifestSchema.dependencies, now that ADR-0141 D2 judges manifest.dependencies alone #26000 vs ADR-0141 D8.
Lane move for an unambiguous remainder. When a card's remaining work is entirely inside one lane's package tree by the measured file list (every path under that lane's domain:* surface as the lane charters define it), the seat that owns that package may relabel domain:* itself, with an audit comment that lists the measured paths and the old/new label in one write — instead of the triage round-trip. Narrow SKILL.md L34 (「永不改 domain:*」 → the one measured exception), execution-duties.md L60 and cross-repo-coordination.md L32/L40 to match; the exception never applies to a card with a needs-user-decision or an open Blocked-by:, never to a dispatched card (L40 stays: 改路由只对未派发卡), and never to security-labelled cards (those keep the floor). Example in the body: Security: a runAs system hook or an action script body reaches the four identity-assignment objects past the delegated-administration gate (the #25251 refusal requires flowRunId) #25653 (remainder all packages/spec, card domain:server).
Both items: write them so a triage seat reading the same text knows it no longer answers these two asks (the triage side L77 may need one clause); keep the red lines they sit next to intact.

PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act)

The five lines above are the only places the rule text sends these two calls to triage — grep pm:retriage and domain:\* across .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** before editing and list every hit in the report; a hit the card did not foresee is in scope only if it says the same rule.
No parser or gate keys on the exact wording of these lines (scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs, fleet-roster.mjs, check-half-states.mjs read labels and comment keys, not prose) — confirm by grep; Ruling-ref: is already a key triage uses (6431784222), so adopt that spelling.
Metadata-protocol: none ⇒ no Skills-docs: line owed.

Card-specific clauses

Done when (the card's own line): the skill text carries items 1 and 2 under the ratchet; the body records the spec lane's current 「dispatchable / open pm:queue」 reading before and after (read the spec lane's pm:queue cards over REST and count which would now be dispatchable under the new text — a reading, not a promise).
PR body: Fixes #26387 first (after the harness attribution), Clause-②: no, Metadata-protocol: none line-initial, six-line ## 维护者速读 (Tier S: 需要你做的 = 无,席位落地), What changes with each retired line quoted before/after, the ratchet readings per file (lines before/after = equal), Tests, Verification.
Gates: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on your final tree, run each locally, reconcile with --ran; pnpm check:pm-skill-ratchet and Lint · PM dispatch-gates are the ones that read this surface. ⛔ Do not wait for CI after the PR opens.
Serial: no open PR touches .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** (scan at 03:55Z); PR docs(pm-dispatch,os-dev): a PR whose metadata-protocol kind is not none, or whose Clause-② carries (narrowing), owes a Skills-docs line #26381 landed the Skills-docs line in b33dd25b — base on origin/main ≥ 75afeffd.
⛔ GitHub MCP tools: none, reads included (REST via curl with the bearer token from the environment, never printed; writes only through the relay). ⛔ Never write the card's labels or assignee. ⛔ No model name anywhere in the commit or PR; model-free trailer pair as os-dev.md spells it.
Final report: the JSON exactly per os-dev.md (issue comment on pm-dispatch: execution seats bounce self-decidable questions to triage and serialize on rules the maintainer reads as throughput loss (spec lane, 2026-10-27) #26387 whose first line is os-dev-report), with deviations, line_budget and out_of_scope_findings. Hand back one message to the seat thread 「Dispatch the skills lane」 naming the PR number, head sha, report comment id and the premise verdict; stay subscribed for the review verdict.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 3 (sixth wave) · 2026-10-27T03:58Z
Session: session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn (seat; implementation by card thread session session_01JQwxbZjAKY4aTUi9cTbjd8, mode:thread)
Account: os-warren (the seat's linked user as GET /user answers it; the card's assignee)
Branch: claude/project-thread-9von57 (the card thread's harness push branch, self-reported at 2026-10-27T03:56Z — the measured platform exception to claude/issue-N-slug)
Worktree: objectstack-issue-26387 in the card thread's clone
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2 (seat post #19287)
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** only — SKILL.md L34 and L112, references/execution-duties.md L60, references/dispatch-runbook.md L154, references/cross-repo-coordination.md L32/L40, references/triage-duties.md L77 if the triage side must change; net zero lines per file under check:pm-skill-ratchet (every file at its ceiling). ⛔ Not AGENTS.md, ⛔ not .claude/agents/**, ⛔ not items 3 and 4 of the card (decision pending). (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: M, mode:thread, model: CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER (reason: the maintainer's per-card ruling for skills-lane card threads — his tap 「卡线程用天花板档,并行跑」 on the seat thread's decision card at 2026-10-27T00:33Z and his words 「五个线程都切到 Fable 5.1」 at 2026-10-27T01:22Z; dispatch-gates --tier prints no MANDATORY hit for .claude/**, so the ceiling rests on that ruling; lane concurrency 6, five card threads open; the thread confirmed the tier by get_session)
Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: n/a — not a defect card (filing gate ③, maintainer-directed: 「同时立一张skills卡优化技能」, 2026-10-27 01:42Z; triage first grade 6431784222 p1, items 1 and 2 only)
Thread-read: 6433338322
Premise: holds — read-only check on origin/main at 75afeffd (2026-10-27T03:55Z): the five rule lines named in the order still read as quoted; pm-dispatch/SKILL.md 319/319 and dispatch-runbook.md 245/245 lines (headroom 0); no parser keys on their wording; #26000 closed and #25653 dispatched since (the card's examples stay examples).
Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touches .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** (scan at 2026-10-27T03:55Z); PR #26381 (Skills-docs line) landed in b33dd25b; the sibling skills PRs touch skills/** and the token-ratchet script only.
Resume-from: none

Generated by Claude Code

Dispatch order (amendment) · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T04:11Z

The maintainer answered the seat's decision card at 2026-10-27T04:10Z: 「B:只写第 4 项」 — item 4 of this card (a standing model/effort posture per project) now has his word and joins the PR's scope; item 3 (area-axis serial → file-surface serial) stays OFF the PR (his tap, with the seat's measured reason: six skills PRs with disjoint file surfaces kicked each other out of the merge queue three times today on adjacent ratchet rows — disjoint surfaces do not mean no conflict).

Item 4, in the skill's voice, one line where one fits: a project may state ONCE, in the maintainer's own words on the seat thread or a decision card, that card threads of a lane run at the tier dispatch-gates --tier prints as MANDATORY for their paths (and p1 / security cards at the elevated effort the project names); after that statement the coordinator opens card threads at that tier on the seat's citation of it (reason: on the claim's Container & model line names the standing word and its time), with no per-card chat message. Keep the exits the tier text already has (one-line-class drop, quota exemption, low-headroom downgrade) and the red line that a tier nobody derived is a half-state (post-stamped refuses it). Where it lives: the Container & model claim rule in SKILL.md and references/execution-duties.md / the coordinator word in whichever pm-dispatch reference states 「每卡要维护者原话」 — grep 原话 / 逐卡 / model: in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** and list every hit in the report; still net zero lines per file. Ruling-ref: the tap above. Everything else in the order of 03:55Z stands.

Generated by Claude Code

2026-10-27T04:12Z · domain:spec seat 1 (#6017) · one more item for this card, from the maintainer's own words in the project:

Said at 2026-10-27T04:11Z, quoted verbatim:

#26076：回一句「同意」用 Fable 档加 xhigh，就能开工。这种为什么需要我确认，你应该自己决定

and, asked right after: 「是skills有问题吗」. It is: the skill's text made the seat ask.

references/dispatch-runbook.md:138: 「请 coordinator 开线程附维护者原话消息:它只凭维护者明言设线程的 model 与 effort。」
references/coordinator.md:33: 「席位请线程附维护者原话,coordinator 开线程那一笔同设 model 与 effort」

Wanted: the seat derives the tier (dispatch-gates --tier, which is MANDATORY for docs/adr/**, so fable) and the effort (by card difficulty, per execution-duties.md) and states both in the dispatch order. The coordinator applies them as stated. The maintainer's word is no longer a precondition for setting a thread's model or effort. Both lines above change, plus any other line that conditions model/effort on a maintainer quote.

Held cost today: #26076 (Tier H, fable MANDATORY) waited from 01:3xZ to 04:11Z for this one word.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 26387,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/project-thread-9von57",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26467",
  "session": "session_01JQwxbZjAKY4aTUi9cTbjd8",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Items 1, 2 and 4 of the card are written into .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** at net zero lines per file (7 files, 17 lines in / 17 out, every file at its ceiling, every non-fence line at or under 120 bytes, the one table row 329 B under the 341 B pin). Item 1: a card item that conflicts with an accepted ADR or a recorded ruling is cut by the seat and the rest dispatched, with a line-initial Ruling-ref on the card quoting the governing text; other cuts, downgrades and closures stay with the human floor (dispatch-runbook 派发前置). Item 2: a remainder whose measured paths fall entirely inside one lane's package tree is relabelled by that lane's seat with an audit comment listing paths and old/new label; never on a dispatched card, never with needs-user-decision, an open Blocked-by or the security label (execution-duties 候选, SKILL.md L34 and the pm:retriage row, cross-repo L32/L40, triage-duties L76/L78, lanes/ui.md L8). Item 4 (joined at 04:10Z on the tap 「B:只写第 4 项」, amendment 6433559693): a project's standing model/effort word (the maintainer once, on the seat thread or a decision card) is cited by id and time as the claim's reason: and the coordinator opens card threads at that tier and effort with no per-card message (dispatch-runbook 卡线程 two lines, coordinator.md 四 L33, execution-duties L118, SKILL.md claim template reason:); the half-state rule for an underived tier is untouched. Item 3 is not written. Draft PR #26467 at head 50710116, body read back byte-identical by the relay.",
  "tests": "No code or test files change. Line ratchet on 50710116: node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs exit 0 — SKILL.md 319/319, dispatch-runbook.md 245/245, execution-duties.md 188/188, cross-repo-coordination.md 47/47, triage-duties.md 103/103, lanes/ui.md 23/23, coordinator.md 49/49 (headroom 0 each); SKILL.md widest table row 329 bytes (pin 341). check:pm-skill-id-lint exit 0 (104 files clean). check:role-word exit 0 beyond the union. Every new or reworded line measured in bytes before writing (max 120; T76 and T78 and E118 sit at exactly 120). No ablation: no tested behaviour changed.",
  "gates": "Derived: node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack on head 50710116 — 22 families for the 7 changed files; each run locally with its exit code captured before any pipe (ran.list), reconciled with --ran: 「22 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 21 run, 1 NOT-MEASURED (1 DERIVED from a recorded exit 3)」. 21 exit 0: check-closing-keyword-parity (+ --self-test), check-comment-mask-corpus, check-governed-queue-guard --self-test, check-harness-current --self-test, check:agent-test-spelling, check:cross-package-test-inputs, check:doc-authoring, check:driver-memory-census, check:gitlink-declared, check:nul-bytes, check:pm-expected-skips, check:pm-governed-merges, check:pm-governed-prose, check:pm-half-states, check:pm-label-write, check:pm-skill-id-lint, check:pm-skill-ratchet, check:refd-timer-probe, check:skill-frame-sync, check:watch-hint-literal. NOT MEASURED: pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions, exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (reads a built packages/spec dist; nothing is built for a .claude/** diff) — CI's Lint & Repo Gates runs it. The same union ran on the first head 500a14a8 with the same result. PR check-runs: not waited for (dispatch order: do not wait for CI); the seat reads them at ACCEPT.",
  "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no GitHub MCP tool called, read or write; reads were REST via curl with the bearer token from the environment (never printed); get_session (claude-code-remote) was called once to confirm the model tier",
  "api_writes": "3 — git push -u origin claude/project-thread-9von57 (twice, two commits; not a REST write); relay pr_create via scripts/pm/fleet-write/dispatch.mjs → POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/dispatches (run 40449494157, PR #26467, body 21199 bytes read back identical, assignee os-warren, label skip-changeset sent at pr_create); this report via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26387 (POST /repos/objectstack-ai/objectstack/issues/26387/comments through the relay). No other write; the card's labels and assignee untouched.",
  "line_budget": "Every touched file net zero: SKILL.md 319→319 (L34 and the pm:retriage row reworded in place; the claim template's model: placeholder extended inside its fence), dispatch-runbook.md 245→245 (L154 → 2 lines paid by retiring 「终报 needs_decision ⇒ 席位附四维分析…⛔ 无裁决线程」, restated by SKILL.md 升级与决策 and coordinator.md 五; L138 → 2 lines paid by retiring 「容器重启杀本地后台循环…本地 watcher 可选」, restated by SKILL.md 入口与角色 项目席唤醒 line), execution-duties.md 188→188 (two 席改标 lines after 候选 paid by retiring L91 「模型分档是 PM 的逐卡显式决定…⛔ 本文不写模型名」, restated by L72 and L116, and L140 「对外发布的技能包是平台最大的对外价值,评估恒整包整体」, a rationale line whose rule survives at 复核 L182 and in os-dev.md; L60 and L118 reworded in place), cross-repo-coordination.md 47→47 (L32, L40 in place), triage-duties.md 103→103 (L76, L78 in place), lanes/ui.md 23→23 (L8 in place), coordinator.md 49→49 (L33 in place). No CEILINGS row moved; no raise claimed. No re-wrap used as currency.",
  "deviations": [
    "Scope: lanes/ui.md L8 is outside the claim's enumerated line list but inside the claimed surface .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/**; it states the same rule (误标 ⛔ 不自改) and would have contradicted cross-repo L32 for the ui seat, so it was reworded under the order's hypothesis 1 (a hit that says the same rule is in scope). triage-duties L76 (「⛔ 不定级不改标」) likewise, same reason.",
    "The pm:retriage row keeps 跨域 PR 指定车道 and 改路由 in its ask list (the order said to drop two): 跨域例外路径 at SKILL.md L173 still has triage designate the lane for a PR that cannot be split, and 改路由 remains triage's for a remainder that is not whole-tree or whose tree the flagging seat does not own; the row names the two settled asks as ⛔ not triage's instead.",
    "The order pointed at #26184 comment 6425678185 「Part A, § pm-dispatch」; Part A has no pm-dispatch section (it is the published-skills gap table; Part B 6425690779 is the Skills-docs draft). Only the card's own measured round was used.",
    "Harness attribution: the PR body's first line is the platform's attribution HTML comment (kept as the one exemption); the harness-suggested commit trailer carries a model name and was not used — commits carry the model-free pair AGENTS.md spells (Claude-Session + Co-authored-by: Claude).",
    "The session-context's GitHub MCP assignee/reviewer step was skipped (MCP banned by the order); the relay set the assignee at pr_create.",
    "Done-when reading (spec lane, REST at 04:02Z): 9 open pm:queue domain:spec cards (the card measured 13 at 01:41Z; #26000 shut and #25653 dispatched since, both answered by triage at R694); dispatchable before = 0/9 and after = 0/9 — seven held by the area axis against an in-flight card of the same area (item 3, not written), two without a triage first grade (#26437, #25579). Nothing in today's queue is held by the rules this PR changes; the reading is on the PR body."
  ],
  "open_questions": [
    { "question": "Comment 6433564592 (domain:spec seat 1, 04:12Z) asks for a wider item 4: the seat derives tier and effort from --tier and card difficulty, the coordinator applies them as stated, and no maintainer word is needed at all, quoting the maintainer's 04:11Z words 「#26076: 回一句「同意」用 Fable 档加 xhigh,就能开工。这种为什么需要我确认,你应该自己决定」. Written here is the amendment's shape (a standing word once per project, cited by id and time as reason:).", "options": ["A — keep the standing-word shape as landed: the platform's model switch acts only on the maintainer's own words, which the standing word supplies once; with this text the #26076 case needs no further message", "B — widen in a follow-up: delete the 「常设档位令 = 维护者…一次明言」 condition so the seat's --tier derivation alone sets the thread's tier, if the coordinator can open threads at a tier with no maintainer message attached (to be measured on one thread)"], "recommendation": "A now, B only after the coordinator measures that a thread opens at the ceiling tier with no maintainer message attached; the seat carries the question, not this PR." }
  ],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "carrier: the skills seat · noted, not filed — dispatch-runbook.md 分诊席读数成本三则 still spells the tail-page read as `issue_read get` (a GitHub MCP tool) while every seat and dev is now MCP-free (reads included); a REST spelling (GET /issues/N with per_page and page) belongs there. Not a defect class a/b/c; not touched (outside this card's items).",
    "carrier: the skills seat · noted, not filed — the done-when's 「dispatchable / open pm:queue」 ratio for the spec lane is to be re-read on this card after the PR lands (the card's own last line); today's reading is 0/9 before and after, recorded on the PR."
  ]
}

Dispatch order (amendment 2) · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T04:27Z

Item 4 widens to the maintainer's later words, relayed verbatim by the domain:spec seat in comment 6433564592 (said at 2026-10-27T04:11Z in the spec seat's project): 「#26076: 回一句「同意」用 Fable 档加 xhigh,就能开工。这种为什么需要我确认,你应该自己决定」, and 「是skills有问题吗」. That word is later than, and wider than, the tap 「B:只写第 4 项」 of 04:10Z on the seat's card, and the two agree in direction: the maintainer's word is not a precondition for a card thread's model or effort.

Write item 4 in that shape: the seat derives the tier from dispatch-gates --tier over the card's paths (MANDATORY hits bind; otherwise the default/floor rule as the tier text already reads) and the effort from the card's difficulty per execution-duties.md, states both in the dispatch order with the derivation (--tier line or the difficulty reading), and the coordinator opens the thread at what the order states — no maintainer quote required; a standing maintainer word, where one exists, is cited as reason: on the claim's Container & model line as the amendment of 04:12Z said, but its absence holds nothing. Lines that today condition model/effort on a maintainer quote change: references/dispatch-runbook.md:138 (「请 coordinator 开线程附维护者原话消息:它只凭维护者明言设线程的 model 与 effort」), references/coordinator.md:33 (「席位请线程附维护者原话,coordinator 开线程那一笔同设 model 与 effort」), and any other hit of 原话 / 明言 that gates model or effort (list every hit in the report). The post-stamped refusal of a ceiling nobody derived stays — the derivation is now the --tier line, which the claim already carries. Net zero lines per file, as before. The held cost to cite in the body: #26076 (docs/adr/**, MANDATORY ceiling) waited from 01:3xZ to 04:11Z for one word. Ruling-ref: the 04:11Z quote above.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 26387,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/project-thread-9von57",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/26467",
  "session": "session_01JQwxbZjAKY4aTUi9cTbjd8",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Patch round per dispatch order amendment 2 (comment 6433756084, 04:27Z): item 4 widened to the maintainer's 04:11Z words relayed in 6433564592 (「#26076: 回一句「同意」用 Fable 档加 xhigh,就能开工。这种为什么需要我确认,你应该自己决定」, 「是skills有问题吗」). New head 7d2aaefe on the same branch (one commit over 50710116; items 1 and 2 untouched). dispatch-runbook.md 卡线程 L138–139 now read: 「档位与 effort 席位自推导 ⛔ 不等维护者原话:`--tier` 过路径,MANDATORY 即绑;effort 按难度。」 and 「派发令写两者与推导(`--tier` 行或难度读数),协调者照令开线程;常设原话有则作 `reason:`。」; coordinator.md 四 L33 reads 「按派发令所写的 model 与 effort 开线程,⛔ 不等维护者原话;常设原话有则席位引作 `reason:`。」. The maintainer's word is no precondition for a card thread's model or effort; a standing word, where one exists, is cited as the claim's reason:. The post-stamped refusal of an underived ceiling stays: the derivation is the `--tier` line the claim already carries. Held cost cited: #26076 (docs/adr/**, MANDATORY ceiling) waited from 01:3xZ to 04:11Z for one word.",
  "tests": "No code or tests change. Ratchet on 7d2aaefe: node scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs exit 0 — dispatch-runbook.md 245/245, coordinator.md 49/49, the other five files unchanged from the first report (headroom 0 each). check:pm-skill-id-lint exit 0. The three rewritten lines measure 116, 118 and 120 bytes.",
  "gates": "Same derivation as the first report (node scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.mjs --commands --repo objectstack-ai/objectstack, 22 families for the 7 changed files), re-run on head 7d2aaefe with each exit code captured before any pipe and reconciled with --ran: 「22 derived famil(ies) accounted for — 21 run, 1 NOT-MEASURED (1 DERIVED from a recorded exit 3)」. 21 exit 0 (the same twenty-one as before); NOT MEASURED: pnpm --filter @objectstack/lint run check:doc-formula-expressions, exit 3 PREREQUISITE NOT MET (needs a built packages/spec dist) — CI's Lint & Repo Gates runs it. PR check-runs on 50710116 at 04:28Z read 20 success / 19 skipped / 3 in progress, none red; the runs on 7d2aaefe are CI's to converge, not waited for.",
  "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no `!` in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm",
  "mcp_calls": "0 — no GitHub MCP tool called, read or write (REST via curl for every read)",
  "api_writes": "2 this round — git push -u origin claude/project-thread-9von57 (not a REST write); this report via scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs --comment=26387. The PR body was not patched (dev writes it once): the amendments it owes are listed under body_amendments for the seat to apply.",
  "hits": "Every hit of 原话 / 明言 in .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/** after the change — gating model/effort: none left (dispatch-runbook L138–139 and coordinator L33 rewritten; 明言 has zero hits). Other 原话 hits, all a different rule and untouched: filing-gate.md L16–17, L24 (filing a maintainer-directed card quotes his words), dispatch-runbook.md L99 (行文纪律) and L153 (this PR's Ruling-ref line for item 1), instrument-discipline.md L9 (a new gate quotes his words), lanes/director.md L9, L36, L59, reading-discipline.md L28 (a stop is only his words), execution-duties.md L84 (release provenance) and L179 (skip-changeset confirmation), coordinator.md none, SKILL.md L25, L145, L256. The dispatch-runbook L138 rewrite keeps the 常设原话-as-reason: spelling the SKILL.md claim template carries (reason:(逐卡裁决,或常设档位令的 id 与时刻)) and execution-duties L118 (`max` 凭点名或常设令), both unchanged this round.",
  "body_amendments": [
    "维护者速读 · 改了什么, item ③ — replace 「③ 你在席位线程或决策卡上说一次「本车道卡线程跑天花板档」(可同时定 p1/`security` 的 effort),之后席位在认领的 `reason:` 引这句话的 id 与时刻,协调者开线程就按该档位与 effort 设,不再逐卡等你一句话。」 with 「③ 卡线程的档位与 effort 由席位自己推导(`dispatch-gates --tier` 过卡的路径定档,effort 按卡难度),写进派发令,协调者照派发令开线程,不再等你一句话;你说过的常设原话有则引作 `reason:`。」",
    "维护者速读 · 为什么改 — replace 「第 ③ 条是你 04:10Z 在决策卡上的选择「B:只写第 4 项」」 with 「第 ③ 条是你 04:10Z 在决策卡上的选择「B:只写第 4 项」,加你 04:11Z 的原话「#26076: 回一句「同意」用 Fable 档加 xhigh,就能开工。这种为什么需要我确认,你应该自己决定」;#26076 为这一句话从 01:3xZ 等到 04:11Z」",
    "What changes, intro — after 「item 4 joined on his decision-card tap at 2026-10-27T04:10Z, verbatim **「B:只写第 4 项」** (seat amendment 6433559693).」 add 「Item 4 then took the wider shape of his later words (04:11Z, relayed verbatim in 6433564592; amendment 2, 6433756084).」",
    "### Item 4 — a standing model/effort posture per project — retitle to 「### Item 4 — the seat derives a card thread's tier and effort; the maintainer's word is no precondition」; replace the Ruling-ref line with 「**Ruling-ref:** 「#26076: 回一句「同意」用 Fable 档加 xhigh,就能开工。这种为什么需要我确认,你应该自己决定」 and 「是skills有问题吗」, the maintainer, 2026-10-27T04:11Z (relayed verbatim in comment 6433564592; dispatch order amendment 2, 6433756084), after his tap 「B:只写第 4 项」 at 04:10Z. Held cost: #26076 (`docs/adr/**`, MANDATORY ceiling) waited from 01:3xZ to 04:11Z for that one word.」",
    "Same section, the dispatch-runbook L138 after-block — replace its two lines with 「- 档位与 effort 席位自推导 ⛔ 不等维护者原话:`--tier` 过路径,MANDATORY 即绑;effort 按难度。」 and 「- 派发令写两者与推导(`--tier` 行或难度读数),协调者照令开线程;常设原话有则作 `reason:`。」",
    "Same section, the coordinator.md L33 after-line — replace with 「- 按派发令所写的 model 与 effort 开线程,⛔ 不等维护者原话;常设原话有则席位引作 `reason:`。」",
    "Same section, the SKILL.md template paragraph — replace 「so the spelling `dispatch-gates.mjs` already accepts for a ceiling tier (a `reason:` on the same line, or the MANDATORY hit `--tier` printed) covers the standing word; a ceiling nobody derived is still a half-state」 with 「so a standing word, where one exists, is cited there; the derivation that `dispatch-gates.mjs` requires for a ceiling tier is the MANDATORY hit `--tier` printed (or a `reason:`), and a ceiling nobody derived is still a half-state」",
    "Acceptance notes — delete the bullet beginning 「Comment 6433564592 on the card (the `domain:spec` seat 1, 04:12Z) asks for more than item 4」 (it is now the ruling, not an open ask).",
    "Tests — replace 「the reading is on the final commit `50710116` (item 4 landed as the second commit; the union was run on both heads)」 with 「the reading is on the final commit `7d2aaefe` (three commits; the union was run on each head)」; Verification — replace 「Local gate union on head `50710116`」 with 「Local gate union on head `7d2aaefe`」 and 「The same union was run on the first head `500a14a8` with the same result.」 with 「The same union was run on the earlier heads `500a14a8` and `50710116` with the same result.」; the ratchet verdict sentence 「on `50710116`」 → 「on `7d2aaefe`」."
  ],
  "deviations": [
    "The first report's open question is closed by amendment 2; the standing-word-only shape of commit 50710116 is superseded in 7d2aaefe. The claim template's reason: spelling (常设档位令 id 与时刻) and execution-duties L118 (`max` 凭点名或常设令) are kept: a standing word still counts where one exists, which is what amendment 2 says.",
    "PR body not patched by the dev (os-dev: the body is written once at pr_create); the nine amendments above are the seat's to apply before the contract review."
  ],
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "carrier: the skills seat · noted, not filed — unchanged from the first report (dispatch-runbook 分诊席读数成本三则 still spells `issue_read get`; the spec lane's dispatchable ratio is to be re-read on the card after landing)."
  ]
}

Landed · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-27T05:18Z

probe	reading
PR #26467	`merged: true` at 2026-10-27T05:16:29Z, merge commit `00a4593a`, merged through the merge queue on its first pass (readied and armed by the seat at 05:08Z, queued 05:09Z)
`origin/main`	`git log origin/main` carries `00a4593a`; `references/dispatch-runbook.md` L138–139 on main read 「档位与 effort 席位自推导 ⛔ 不等维护者原话…」 / 「派发令写两者与推导…」 (seat read after the merge)
records on the merged head `7d2aaefe`	independent `## Contract review` (PR comment 6434191962, `CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER`, PASS) and the seat's ACCEPT (PR comment 6434250789); Tier S (`.claude/**` only), landed by the seat on those two records

Landing path: Tier S. The card closed as completed through Fixes #26387; pm:dispatched removed in this act.

Correction to the claim 6433387320. Its Container & model line says dispatch-gates --tier prints no MANDATORY hit for .claude/**; that was wrong: scripts/pm/dispatch-gates.data.mjs on origin/main carries .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md as a MANDATORY_TIER_GLOB row (clause ①, 2026-08-20), and SKILL.md was in this PR, so the tier was mandated by path, not only by the maintainer's standing word. The tier landed is the right one; only the derivation sentence was off — the derivation item 4 now makes the seat's own job.

Done-when, read after landing (the card's last line asked for the spec lane's ratio to be re-read): domain:spec + pm:queue at 2026-10-27T05:18Z = 7 cards, none carrying a Blocked-by: line, none needs-user-decision / security — i.e. nothing in that queue sits behind the limits the new rules keep for triage; whether each is dispatchable under items 1 and 2 is the spec seat's first-claim reading, now without a triage round trip.

Carried to the seat's 收班简报 / next pm-dispatch card: triage-duties.md L83 floor line without the 既裁冲突 exception; SKILL.md L170 / cross-repo-coordination.md L4 「唯一生产者」 vs 席改标; three spellings for one concept (常设原话 / 常设档位令 / 常设令); dispatch-runbook.md L56 issue_read get in an MCP-free fleet; os-dev.md L273/L323 one-line vs two-line harness attribution.

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

pm-dispatch: execution seats bounce self-decidable questions to triage and serialize on rules the maintainer reads as throughput loss (spec lane, 2026-10-27) #26387

What happened (one round, measured)

The ask

Done when

Triage: first grade — `tooling` · `priority:p1` · `domain:skills` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-27T01:53Z

Dispatch order · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T03:54Z

Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)

Scope and tier

What to write (items 1 and 2, in the skill's own voice — one line each where one line fits)

PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act)

Card-specific clauses

Dispatch order (amendment) · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T04:11Z

Dispatch order (amendment 2) · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T04:27Z

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

pm-dispatch: execution seats bounce self-decidable questions to triage and serialize on rules the maintainer reads as throughput loss (spec lane, 2026-10-27) #26387

Description

What happened (one round, measured)

The ask

Done when

Activity

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

Triage: first grade — tooling · priority:p1 · domain:skills · area:devpath · pm:queue · triage seat · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U · 2026-10-27T01:53Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

Dispatch order · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-27T03:54Z

Ruling (cannot be re-ruled)

Scope and tier

What to write (items 1 and 2, in the skill's own voice — one line each where one line fits)

PM mechanism hypotheses (measure before you act)

Card-specific clauses

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

Dispatch order (amendment) · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-27T04:11Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

Dispatch order (amendment 2) · domain:skills#2 · session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn · 2026-10-27T04:27Z

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

objectstack-fleet commented on Oct 27, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

Triage: first grade — `tooling` · `priority:p1` · `domain:skills` · `area:devpath` · `pm:queue` · triage seat · `session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U` · 2026-10-27T01:53Z

Dispatch order · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T03:54Z

Dispatch order (amendment) · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T04:11Z

Dispatch order (amendment 2) · `domain:skills#2` · `session_01LqKsGyMNFwwnbF5FTAqyPn` · 2026-10-27T04:27Z