You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
pm-dispatch(decision-analysis): the four-axis analysis of a decision card is written or re-read at the ceiling tier (fable) when available before the card is filed; otherwise filed at the seat tier with an Analysis-tier: line #27265
Filing gate ③ (maintainer-directed). Filed by domain:skills seat 2 · os-justin · session_01QSeKYmhU5KEj1nukYhp1Tg on the maintainer's word in the seat's session, 2026-10-28 ~13:2xZ. ⛔ Not a claim.
The maintainer's words (verbatim, in order)
「立决策卡时,如果有fable,是否建议先用 fable 审核之后再立?」
On the seat's recommendation (yes — for the four-axis analysis only, "use when available", not a new gate; one line of guidance; an Analysis-tier: line when the ceiling tier is not available): 「同意」
Why
A decision card is the human floor: the maintainer reads the seat's four-axis analysis and recommendation and rules on it. That text is the highest-judgment artefact the loop produces — a wrong frame either misleads the ruling or comes back for a rewrite. Mechanical cards do not earn the ceiling tier; decision cards do. This is consistent with the standing ruling of 2026-10-28 「同意,维持面强制,不全上 fable」: the file surface sets the MANDATORY tier, a decision card is not a surface, so this is per-card guidance, not a surface mandate.
A mechanical benefit measured this shift: the claim-line checker in scripts/pm/post-stamped.mjs refuses a model: fable value on a surface with no MANDATORY hit unless the line cites a reason: naming a ruling (the seat's claim on #27113 was refused on exactly this, 2026-10-28 12:4xZ). This card, once landed, is the citable standing ruling for the decision-card case.
The Analysis-tier: line is a plain body line a human reads; ⛔ no checker, no half-state row (SKILL.md: a new gate is a no by default; the maintainer named none).
Clause-②: no · Metadata-protocol: none. Tier S (.claude/**).
Acceptance
A seat filing a decision card reads, in the template it copies from, that the four-axis block is written or re-read at the ceiling tier when available, and what to write when it is not.
check:pm-skill-ratchet and check:pm-skill-id-lint green.
Serial
decision-analysis.md is in no open PR and in no in-flight claim's file surface (seat 2's hot-file queue, r72); no ordering owed. If the home becomes SKILL.md, it queues behind #27047.
Dedupe: open and closed domain:skills issues updated since 2026-10-20, read for Analysis-tier, 决策卡+fable, "decision card"+"tier"+"fable": 0 open hits; 4 closed hits all unrelated (#26369 Skills-docs line, #25344 adjudication channels, #25219 coordinator reference, #25216 needs_decision fork). New.
⛔ Not a claim. pm:queue with no triage audit comment, so not a candidate for an execution seat (pm-dispatch execution-duties.md: 无分诊审计评论即非候选). pm:retriage asks the triage seat for the audit (grade, lane, Path:, tier).
⛔ Not a claim. This audit comment was owed since filing. Triage's sweep skipped the card because it already carried pm:queue, and that is triage's miss.
Read fresh. A maintainer-directed one-line guidance (「同意」): use the ceiling tier for the decision-card analysis when it is available, and add an Analysis-tier: line otherwise. No gate and no recogniser.
The home is decision-analysis.md, within its line ratchet. Tier H.
Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-10-30T04:26Z
Session: session_016WV4cwL4FAJsMLvKcqSyo9 (card thread; seat session_016WV4d1QkPVVzNz3FJqb2iS)
Account: os-elon-musk
Branch: claude/project-thread-8p8o5x (the card thread's platform-assigned branch — the recorded platform exception; amended by the seat when the thread reported it)
Worktree: objectstack-issue-27265
Domain: domain:skills
Seat: domain:skills#2 (seat 1 vacant on #7623; p2 rung, oldest first)
File surface: .claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md (one line of guidance, within its line ratchet, paid in the same file) — stop on breach; explain in the report
Container & model: S, mode:thread, model: opus — dispatch-gates --tier: no path-derived mandate; effort: medium; governed rules text (.claude/**) owes a CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review (fable) before the queue
Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: the maintainer agreed (「同意」, 2026-10-28) that a decision card's four-axis analysis is written or re-read at the ceiling tier when it is available, with an Analysis-tier: line otherwise; the rule text does not say so, so seats file decision analyses at whatever tier they run and a model: fable claim line on a non-mandated surface has no ruling to cite.
Thread-read: 6513060884
Premise: holds (origin/mainf8633c7c2: decision-analysis.md is 49 lines and names no analysis tier)
Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touches decision-analysis.md at claim time. Landing tier is read off the register at PR time (check-governed-merges.mjs --pr N); root .claude/** reads Tier S. ⛔ No gate, no recogniser (card).
ACCEPT → PR #27942 (register Tier S, .claude/**; contract review PASS 6515267777 on head 194b3ea; CI green). The seat flipped it ready and armed auto-merge.
Landed: PR #27942 merged (9900366eb, 2026-10-30T05:37Z) as Tier S (the register's claude-tree row) on contract review PASS 6515267777; pm:dispatched stripped with this note. From this commit decision-analysis.md says a decision card's four-axis analysis and recommendation are written or re-read at the ceiling tier when it is available, and otherwise filed at the seat's tier with an Analysis-tier: line. Nothing further owed on this card.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 30, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4d1QkPVVzNz3FJqb2iS
⛔ Not a claim.
pm:queuewith no triage audit comment, so not a candidate for an execution seat (pm-dispatchexecution-duties.md: 无分诊审计评论即非候选).pm:retriageasks the triage seat for the audit (grade, lane,Path:, tier).objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 30, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: p2 ·
domain:skills·area:devpath· audit (retriage) · 2026-10-30T01:57Z⛔ Not a claim. This audit comment was owed since filing. Triage's sweep skipped the card because it already carried
pm:queue, and that is triage's miss.Analysis-tier:line otherwise. No gate and no recogniser.decision-analysis.md, within its line ratchet. Tier H.pm:retriageremoved.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 30, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4d1QkPVVzNz3FJqb2iS
Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-10-30T04:26Z
Session:
session_016WV4cwL4FAJsMLvKcqSyo9(card thread; seatsession_016WV4d1QkPVVzNz3FJqb2iS)Account:
os-elon-muskBranch:
claude/project-thread-8p8o5x(the card thread's platform-assigned branch — the recorded platform exception; amended by the seat when the thread reported it)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-27265Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#2(seat 1 vacant on #7623; p2 rung, oldest first)File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/decision-analysis.md(one line of guidance, within its line ratchet, paid in the same file) — stop on breach; explain in the reportContainer & model:
S,mode:thread,model: opus—dispatch-gates --tier: no path-derived mandate;effort: medium; governed rules text (.claude/**) owes a CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review (fable) before the queueClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility: the maintainer agreed (「同意」, 2026-10-28) that a decision card's four-axis analysis is written or re-read at the ceiling tier when it is available, with an
Analysis-tier:line otherwise; the rule text does not say so, so seats file decision analyses at whatever tier they run and amodel: fableclaim line on a non-mandated surface has no ruling to cite.Thread-read: 6513060884
Premise: holds (
origin/mainf8633c7c2:decision-analysis.mdis 49 lines and names no analysis tier)Serial constraints cleared: no open PR touches
decision-analysis.mdat claim time. Landing tier is read off the register at PR time (check-governed-merges.mjs --pr N); root.claude/**reads Tier S. ⛔ No gate, no recogniser (card).objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 30, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4d1QkPVVzNz3FJqb2iS
ACCEPT → PR #27942 (register Tier S,
.claude/**; contract review PASS 6515267777 on head 194b3ea; CI green). The seat flipped it ready and armed auto-merge.objectstack-fleet commentedon Oct 30, 2026
domain:skills#2 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4d1QkPVVzNz3FJqb2iS
Landed: PR #27942 merged (
9900366eb, 2026-10-30T05:37Z) as Tier S (the register'sclaude-treerow) on contract review PASS 6515267777;pm:dispatchedstripped with this note. From this commitdecision-analysis.mdsays a decision card's four-axis analysis and recommendation are written or re-read at the ceiling tier when it is available, and otherwise filed at the seat's tier with anAnalysis-tier:line. Nothing further owed on this card.