Repository navigation
docs(adr): record the #28971 ruling at ADR-0131 D13 and in ADR-0017 — named personal views are a user-owned data object #29038
Description
epic:#26676#1 · zhuangjianguo · session_cdb7a717def74e719988f089fbaa18ff
Filed by the record-page epic seat as an execution step of the ruling on #28971. The maintainer answered 「同意」 (2026-11-02) to the seat's recommendation of option C. Readings are on main ab085a0482. No domain:* label is set: triage routes this card.
This is a dated note only. It changes docs/adr/**, so it follows the governed-surface path and waits for a maintainer approval.
Reading
docs/adr/0131-total-organization-ownership-no-null-organization-id.md, D13 (around line 909): "a per-user 'personal view' scope stays the parked v18 direction … if pulled, it returns as a user-owned D3 object, not as this table."docs/adr/0017-object-has-many-view.md, line 71: thepersonallayer, "visible only to itsowner". This ADR carries the amendment note.
Target
Add one dated note at each place, citing #28971, saying:
- Named personal views are a user-owned D3 object, as D13 anticipated. The direction is ruled, no longer parked.
- They are not view items, and they do not reuse
scope: 'personal'. - The first version follows List personalization: a stored sort or filter on a deleted or unreadable field is dropped when the list opens, as the URL route already does #28949, List personalization: 「恢复视图默认」 clears the reader's stored setting instead of copying the default into it — today the reader stays on the old value after the view changes #28948, List personalization: one visible 「已个性化」 marker and one reset that restores the whole list — today two reset entries cover different parts and neither says what changed #28950 and List views: readers can hide and show columns by default — flip the userActions.hideFields default, so a generated app has the control without having to declare it #28912.
Do not rewrite the ADRs' existing text.
Acceptance
Both notes are present and cite #28971, and no other text in either ADR changes.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 2, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage:
domain:spec· p3 ·pm:queue· 2026-11-02T07:18Z⛔ Not a claim.
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 2, 2026
domain:spec#1 · os-steve · session_01ADHkmPi25XXKx92Xmg4viS
Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-11-02T11:40Z
Session:
session_01ADHkmPi25XXKx92Xmg4viS(seat); dev = card threadsession_01ADHkmPtNBPh7cTMHdPYPrTAccount:
os-steveBranch:
claude/project-thread-dm9b5sWorktree: the card thread's own checkout of
objectstack-ai/objectstackDomain:
domain:specSeat:
domain:spec#1File surface:
docs/adr/0131-total-organization-ownership-no-null-organization-id.md(one dated note at D13) anddocs/adr/0017-object-has-many-view.md(one dated note at thepersonallayer); the generated ADR index only if a gate names it; nopackages/**(stop on breach; explain in the report)Container & model:
XS,mode:thread,model: default — the tier is the PM's per-card call (floor sonnet · default opus · ceiling fable); governed ADR text (Tier H), one CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER review by the seat, maintainer approval before landing,effort: mediumClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility:
docs/adr 0131 D13 + 0017 personal layer | the #28971 ruling (maintainer 「同意」, option C) moved named personal views from parked to ruled as a user-owned D3 object | readers of the ADRs who would still read the direction as parkedThread-read: 6571427299
Premise: holds (on origin/main
31826d3318ADR-0131 D13 still calls a per-user personal view scope the parked v18 direction; ADR-0017 still describes thepersonallayer as visible only to its owner)Serial constraints cleared: none (#29037, the spec retirement, is a separate card on different files)
Ruling-ref: #28971 — maintainer 「同意」 to option C (2026-11-02), recorded on #29038; triage 6571427299.
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 2, 2026
domain:spec#1 · os-steve · session_01ADHkmPtNBPh7cTMHdPYPrT
os-dev-report
{ "issue": 29038, "status": "done", "branch": "claude/project-thread-dm9b5s", "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectstack/pull/29321", "session": "session_01ADHkmPtNBPh7cTMHdPYPrT", "premise_still_valid": true, "summary": "Appended one dated note under ADR-0131 D13 (after the paragraph, before D14) and one indented note under ADR-0017 section 2's personal-scope bullet. Each cites ruling of record 6570568131 on #28971 (letter C) and says: named personal views are a user-owned D3 object, ruled not parked; not view items and no reuse of scope personal; first version follows #28949, #28948, #28950, #28912. Diff +22/-0, no existing ADR text changed, no Status line edited. Draft PR, Tier H, skip-changeset.", "tests": "No code or test touched, so no package tests and no ablation (docs/adr only). Premise read on origin/main 31826d33: ADR-0131 L909-910 'parked v18 direction ... user-owned D3 object'; ADR-0017 L71-72 personal layer; view.zod.ts L5787 still says PARKED.", "gates": "head 29c1fd16: dispatch-gates --commands derived 21; all 21 run, all exit 0 (check-adr-links +self-test, closing-keyword-parity +self-test, comment-mask-corpus, plan-test-core-shards self-test, lint check:doc-formula-expressions after lint closure build under os-verify-lock VERDICT command-exit 0, check:adr-anchors, adr-index, adr-symbol-anchors, ci-filter-parity, closed-ceremony-text, cross-package-test-inputs, doc-authoring, driver-memory-census, gitlink-declared, nul-bytes, pm-governed-merges, pm-prior-rulings, refd-timer-probe, watch-hint-literal). --ran: 21 derived, 21 run, 0 NOT-MEASURED, 0 UNRUN (DERIVED zero). adr-index --report: README current, no regen. check-governed-merges --test: governed true, tier H (docs/adr). check-changeset-no-major on the PR body offline: exit 0. CI check-runs: in_progress at report time.", "dogfood_battery": "n/a — no ! in the PR title and no (narrowing) arm", "files_changed": ["docs/adr/0017-object-has-many-view.md", "docs/adr/0131-total-organization-ownership-no-null-organization-id.md"], "line_budget": "+22 / -0, 2 files, governed (Tier H), under the 3000 human-merge threshold", "deviations": "none", "mcp_calls": "6 — mcp__github__issue_read x5 (get #29038, get_comments #29038 x2, get #28971, get_comments #28971), mcp__github__pull_request_read x1 (get #29321); no write tools", "api_writes": "2 — fleet-write relay pr_create (PR #29321, labels skip-changeset) and this os-dev-report comment via post-stamped.mjs; git push of the branch is not a REST write", "open_questions": [ { "question": "Should either ADR's Status line also gain an Amended entry pointing at the note?", "options": ["A: no, the dated notes alone carry it, as the card's acceptance says no other text changes", "B: add a one-line Amended entry to each Status line in a follow-up commit on this PR"], "recommendation": "A, because the card's acceptance forbids other text changes and both notes already say how the surrounding text reads" } ], "security_findings": "none", "out_of_scope_findings": [] }Stamped 2026-11-02T11:53Z.
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 2, 2026
domain:spec#1 · os-steve · session_01ADHkmPi25XXKx92Xmg4viS
Landed · 2026-11-02T15:48Z
7b1ae3383e, through the merge queue after the governed approvalcompletedbyFixes #29038pm:dispatchedis removed. Two CONTRACT_REVIEW_TIER PASS records on968a13a5. The #28971 ruling is recorded at ADR-0131 D13 and in ADR-0017.