[Decision] New gate check:package-naming (#29710): the maintainer asked for a repo rule against generic package names — is a CI gate part of that, or the rule text (#29709) alone? #29725

triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U

Filing gate ②, a decision only the maintainer can make. A new gate is human-floor, and the standing rule is 「新增门禁默认否」: a new gate is "no" by default. ⛔ Not a claim. Reader who acts: the maintainer rules here. Then domain:server#2, which dispatched #29710, carries the letter to that card's thread.

维护者速读

• 问题：Warren 在给推送通道包定名时说「应该用 service-*，包括如何制定仓库规则，避免类似的问题」「plugin- 太笼统，是不是建议逐渐退役这个名字」。server#2 据此立了两张卡并已派发：
  • Package naming rule: name a new package by its kind (service-*, connector-*, ...) and freeze the plugin- prefix at today's ten (AGENTS.md roles rows + pm-dispatch order line) #29709：规则文字，写进 AGENTS.md 和 pm-dispatch，PR docs(agents): name a new package by its kind and freeze the plugin- prefix at its ten #29717 已出；
  • Gate check:package-naming: every packages/services/ package is @objectstack/service-*, and the @objectstack/plugin-* set is a ratchet frozen at today's ten #29710：新增 CI 门禁 check:package-naming。
    原话要的是"仓库规则"，没有点名要门禁。按「新增门禁默认否」，门禁需要您明确同意。
• 门禁做什么（Gate check:package-naming: every packages/services/ package is @objectstack/service-*, and the @objectstack/plugin-* set is a ratchet frozen at today's ten #29710）：
  • packages/services/ 下的包必须叫 @objectstack/service-*；
  • @objectstack/plugin-* 冻结在现有 10 个，第 11 个直接红；
  • 现有包不改名。
• 推荐 A：同意这道门禁。它只是一个棘轮，成本低，误报面很小。包名一旦发布，不发大版本就收不回来，光靠文字规则拦不住下一个 ADR 再写出 plugin-*。
• 代价：check:all 多一道检查；ADR 里写的包名如果与规则冲突，要先改 ADR。
• 您要做的一个动作：回一个字母。

Options

• A (triage's lean): approve the gate. Gate check:package-naming: every packages/services/ package is @objectstack/service-*, and the @objectstack/plugin-* set is a ratchet frozen at today's ten #29710 lands as written, next to the rule text in Package naming rule: name a new package by its kind (service-*, connector-*, ...) and freeze the plugin- prefix at today's ten (AGENTS.md roles rows + pm-dispatch order line) #29709.
• B: rule text only. Package naming rule: name a new package by its kind (service-*, connector-*, ...) and freeze the plugin- prefix at today's ten (AGENTS.md roles rows + pm-dispatch order line) #29709 lands. Gate check:package-naming: every packages/services/ package is @objectstack/service-*, and the @objectstack/plugin-* set is a ratchet frozen at today's ten #29710 closes not planned, and the rule is checked by review only.
• C: approve only the ratchet half. Freeze plugin-* at ten, but drop the packages/services/** ⇒ service-* check.

Until ruled

• Gate check:package-naming: every packages/services/ package is @objectstack/service-*, and the @objectstack/plugin-* set is a ratchet frozen at today's ten #29710's dev may keep a draft. ⛔ The gate does not go ready or into the queue before a letter is recorded here.
• Package naming rule: name a new package by its kind (service-*, connector-*, ...) and freeze the plugin- prefix at today's ten (AGENTS.md roles rows + pm-dispatch order line) #29709 (rule text) is not held: it is a rule change the maintainer directed.

Links: #29709, #29710, PR #29717, #29041.

Generated by Claude Code