[Decision] The list bulk bar offers only delete: should the platform offer bulk edit? #30079

Activity

1. objectstack-fleet

   added

   priority:p2Medium: important, M3Medium: important, M3

   needs-user-decisionBlocked on a maintainer decision — do not dispatch; decision cards only, never on a PRBlocked on a maintainer decision — do not dispatch; decision cards only, never on a PR

   on Nov 4, 2026
2. objectstack-fleet commented on Nov 4, 2026

   

   objectstack-fleetBot

   on Nov 4, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   epic:#26676#1 · zhuangjianguo · session_cdb7a717def74e719988f089fbaa18ff

   The maintainer, 2026-11-04: 「30079这种不是应该在元数据应用中自己去开发自定义操作吗？你的意见是批量换负责人放到内核吗？其他全部同意」.

   The seat withdraws its recommendation (B first). Nothing goes into the kernel for this. The maintainer's question was right, and the seat had not measured the metadata route before recommending.

   Measured on main 63b86b385d, on the example CRM, with no code: one list view override in the customization package adding this to the view:

   bulkActionDefs: [{
     name: 'eval_change_owner',
     label: '批量修改负责人',
     operation: 'update',
     confirmText: '把选中的 {{ count }} 条线索转给新负责人？',
     params: [{ name: 'owner_id', label: '新负责人', type: 'lookup', object: 'sys_user', required: true }],
   }]

   Step	Result
   Select two leads	The bulk bar shows 批量修改负责人
   The dialog	A user lookup, then a confirmation listing both records and the new owner
   执行	POST /api/v1/data/crm_lead/updateMany → 200, 成功 2 / 2, with 撤销 offered, and updated_at moved on those two rows only

   • An owner_id reassignment is denied without allowTransfer (packages/spec/src/security/permission.zod.ts:522-530). The seat read this and did not exercise it with a second account.
   • Declaring these defs replaced the default 删除 on that view's bar in this test, so an author who wants both declares both. Whether that is intended was not read in depth.
   • Studio's view panel offers no editor for bulkActionDefs, so today this is authored in metadata, by a developer or an AI. Opening that editor is not proposed here.

   This card stays open with needs-user-decision only until the maintainer confirms closing it as not planned.
3. objectstack-fleet

   removed

   needs-user-decisionBlocked on a maintainer decision — do not dispatch; decision cards only, never on a PRBlocked on a maintainer decision — do not dispatch; decision cards only, never on a PR

   on Nov 4, 2026
4. objectstack-fleet commented on Nov 4, 2026

   

   objectstack-fleetBot

   on Nov 4, 2026

   ContributorAuthor

   More actions

   epic:#26676#1 · zhuangjianguo · session_cdb7a717def74e719988f089fbaa18ff

   The maintainer, 2026-11-04: 「同意你的建议」, answering the seat's proposal to close this card as not planned, with #30089 carrying the need.

   Closed 2026-11-04T13:09Z as not planned. No kernel feature for bulk owner change or bulk edit: a view's bulkActionDefs already provides it in metadata, as measured in the comment above. #30089, ruled A, adds the Studio section that lets a person configure it.
5. objectstack-fleet

   closed this as not plannedon Nov 4, 2026