Repository navigation
Description
repo:cloud#2 · os-zhuang · session_0123kRqqdpAJWYMgsgdAJX4G
Filing gate ③, a task on the maintainer's word. Sam, 2026-11-04 14:45Z in the cloud seat 2 thread: 「cloud 私有仓库可以直接用带 security 标签的普通 issue,立卡修改 skills」.
Reader: the domain:skills lane (.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/security-findings.md, plus any file that points to it). Suggested priority p2; triage decides.
维护者速读
现在 pm-dispatch 规定,安全发现「永不立卡」,只能写成仓库的草稿安全公告。但中继对 cloud 建公告会返回 404,所以 cloud 的发现一直是在对话里口头交给你,修复走无卡派发令。你的裁定是:cloud 这类私有仓库,直接用带 security 标签的普通 issue。这张卡就是把 skill 里的规则改成这样。
Ruling to encode
For a finding whose affected repository is private (today: objectstack-ai/cloud):
- The private record is an ordinary issue in that repository, carrying the
securitylabel. It is filed through the relay'sissue-createlike any card, and it holds the mechanism. - The fix is dispatched from that issue like any card, at effort
xhigh. It needs no card-less ORDER and no draft advisory.
Unchanged for public repositories (objectstack, objectui, hotcrm, the docs and site repos): a draft advisory through the relay, never an issue (§2–§3 as written).
Work
security-findings.md. Add the private-repository branch above. Name how a seat tells the two cases apart: the repository'sprivateflag, read from the API at filing time, never recalled. Update §2's "⛔ 不立 issue" and §3's fallback A so they apply to public repositories only, and keep §8 ("一处成文").securityalready exists as a label on cloud, so no new label is needed.- What still stays rule-level on a private repository. Pick one answer and write it down, because a private repository can be made public later and its history goes with it. Recommended: the issue holds the mechanism; PR titles, PR bodies, commit messages and changesets still state only the rule (§6), and link the issue.
- The relay log.
fleet-writeruns on this public repository. Before the rule ships, confirm that anissue-createstroke's body never reaches the public run log (the validator, the executor rows and the summary), and pin that with a test inscripts/pm/fleet-write. If any part of the body can reach the log, the rule must say how the mechanism gets into the issue without passing through it. - Update every file that points to
security-findings.md(gate, lanes,os-dev,checklist-test) only where a pointer's wording would now be wrong. Restate nothing.
Done when
security-findings.mdcarries the private-repository branch, and the skill's line and byte limits pass.- The relay-log question is answered and pinned by a test.
- A cloud seat that reads the skill files a cloud finding as a
securityissue.
Dedupe
repo:objectstack-ai/objectstack is:issue security-findings private: 166 hits. None of them changes where a private repository's finding is recorded. The nearest are:
- pm/fleet-write: the relay publishes a security advisory on the maintainer's list: reopen, set the affected and patched versions, publish #30110 (the relay publishes advisories): about public advisories, not private repositories.
- fleet-write: after the first live advisory_report, every later report answers HTTP 403, write-pace files it as an egress-proxy refusal (no back-off), and the relay hides GitHub's message, so the cause cannot be read #29402 (
advisory_report403s): a relay defect. - pm-dispatch(security): one fleet-wide rule for security findings — never a card, never a public mechanism; tracked as a GitHub draft security advisory, fixed by a no-card pm-dispatch order #29111 and pm-dispatch(security): a dev, seat or QA runner that meets a security finding reports it through the security channel and never fixes it in place — security-findings.md states it once, os-dev.md points to it #29731 (closed): the rule this card amends.
The security seat (#29740, security#1) owns findings end to end, so tell it about this change.
Activity
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 4, 2026
triage#1 · os-zhuang · session_01AavokzJ5DndAwitDXvKy4U
Path: none
Triage: first-touch audit · p2 kept ·
domain:skillskept ·pm:queuekept · 2026-11-04T14:55Z⛔ Not a claim.
security, filed through the relay. Public repositories keep the draft-advisory rule. p2 kept.security-findings.md.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 5, 2026
domain:skills#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4d1mkgEris4MHHLjtnk
Claim: PM loop round 1 · 2026-11-05T22:53Z
Session:
session_016WV4d1mkgEris4MHHLjtnkAccount:
os-elon-musk(the seat's linked user asGET /useranswers it; the card's assignee)Branch:
claude/project-thread-shi9ig(the card thread's designated branch; dev sessionsession_016WV4cxfNdCqsVzihQoX3BE, amended by the seat)Worktree:
objectstack-issue-30114Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#1File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/security-findings.md(the private-repository branch; §2 and §3 fallback A scoped to public repositories; §6 rule-level for PR titles, bodies, commits and changesets on a private repository too); pointer wording only where it would now be wrong in.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/lanes/security.md,.claude/agents/os-dev.mdand other files that point tosecurity-findings.md;scripts/pm/fleet-write/**tests only (the pin that anissue_createbody never reaches the public run log: validator, executor rows, summary). ⛔ A behaviour change infleet-writeitself: stop and report (stop on breach)Container & model:
M,mode:thread,model: TIER_DEFAULT(dispatch-gates --tier: no path-derived mandate),effort: highClause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect card(a maintainer ruling to encode: 「cloud 私有仓库可以直接用带 security 标签的普通 issue,立卡修改 skills」)Thread-read: 6633882869
Premise: holds:
security-findings.md§2 still reads 「⛔ 不立 issue」 for every repository onorigin/main788715ef; #30110 and #30111 (same file) are closedSerial constraints cleared: #30110 and #30111 closed; no open PR touches
security-findings.md(open PRs read at claim time). Next on that file: #30271 (serial)Tier S (
.claude/**) for the rules text; the seat lands it on an at-tier contract-review PASS with every check green. The security seat (security#1) is told at landing.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 6, 2026
domain:skills#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4d1mkgEris4MHHLjtnk
Release: session_016WV4d1mkgEris4MHHLjtnk · seat clock-out (maintainer 「skills 处理完当前任务就下班」, 2026-11-06, project chat) · back to
pm:queuefordomain:skills#2· 2026-11-06T07:53ZClaim 6671655834 is released whole. Nothing is in flight on it, and no PR is open.
messagequotes the body (for example a 422) reaches the public run log unfiltered:requestLandedreturnsHTTP {status} — {json.message}(scripts/pm/fleet-write/execute.mjs~L593). It lands in the row, in the✗ actionlog line and in both step-summary lines. Every other channel withholds the value.json.messageon a refusal, then hold pm-dispatch skills: say who confirms a pending-changeset correction (the seat's record, never a maintainer wait) everywhere a dev or the gate is told to "get it confirmed", and keep PR bodies from narrating pre-fix behaviour on security fixes #30271 behind it. The next seat asks for the ruling again before any code; ⛔ no autonomous ruling.claude/project-thread-shi9ig@5274bbc6(pushed, no PR). The local gate loggates-ran-5274bbc6.txtand the full readingreport-30114-relay-log.mdare in the seat folderskills-lane-seat1/30114/of the fleet project files.Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 7, 2026
domain:skills#1 · os-elon-musk · session_016WV4cxfNdCqsVzihQoX3BE
Handoff: maintainer ruling recorded · 2026-11-07T04:52Z
⛔ Not a claim. This is a record only. The card stays in
pm:queuefor the nextdomain:skillsseat.Ruling. On the relay-log question (comment 6680051129), the maintainer picked option A2 on the decision card in the card thread, verbatim: 「A2 本卡里一起修中继」. They then added: 「你已经下班了,只需要记录」. So no work was done in that session.
What A2 means for the next seat:
messagequotes the payload, the generic failure path inscripts/pm/fleet-write/execute.mjs(requestLanded) withholds that message. Today it prints the message unfiltered into the row, the action log line and both step-summary lines. The advisory rows already withhold such a message throughadvisoryRefusalCause. Pin the fix in the executor's self-test.security-findings.mdprivate-repository rule.scripts/pm/fleet-write/execute.mjsand its self-test. The new claim must name that surface.Resume-from:
claude/project-thread-shi9ig@5274bbc6(pushed, no PR). It already carries:issue_createAll 46 derived gates and
pnpm lintwere green on that head. Mergeorigin/mainbefore resuming.Serial: #30271 waits on this card.
Generated by Claude Code
objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 7, 2026
domain:skills#3 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAj7CvjkGXvgXzd6RZ7
Claim: PM loop round 13 · 2026-11-07T05:53Z
Session:
session_01J8VVAj7CvjkGXvgXzd6RZ7Account:
huangyiireneBranch:
claude/project-thread-kk5w88(the card thread's designated branch; dev sessionsession_01J8VVAjG6DxvHuUKNbj3JB1), resuming from seat 1'sclaude/project-thread-shi9ig@5274bbc6by mergeWorktree:
objectstack-issue-30114Domain:
domain:skillsSeat:
domain:skills#3File surface:
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/security-findings.md; pointer lines whose wording is now wrong in.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/filing-gate.md,references/lanes/security.md,.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/SKILL.md;scripts/pm/fleet-write/execute.mjs(therequestLandedfailure path and its self-test only, by ruling A2 in 6702493518);scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjsonly to revert seat 1's ceiling raise (stop on breach)Container & model:
M,mode:thread, project-default model,effort: high.dispatch-gates --tieris run by the thread and reported; any mandate above this thread's is waived by the maintainer's standing order in this project (2026-11-03) and said so in the PR body; this seat runs the contract review.Clause-②: no
Metadata-protocol: none
Responsibility:
n/a — not a defect card(the relay half: a platform refusalmessagequoting a payload reaches the public run log viarequestLanded; objectstack carries the fix)Thread-read: 6702493518
Premise: holds on
main719a502b:security-findings.mdstill says a finding is never an issue on any repository;requestLandedstill printsjson.messageon a refusal.Serial constraints: #30271 waits on this card. No line-ceiling raise: the card body directs the rule, not a ceiling; growth is paid by same-file restatement deletion, else the seat asks the maintainer.
No changeset (nothing published):
skip-changeset.Fixes #30114. Tier read bycheck-governed-mergesat the PR.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 7, 2026
domain:skills#3 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAj7CvjkGXvgXzd6RZ7
Claim widened (a pointer whose wording the new rule makes wrong, before the PR opens) · 2026-11-07T06:03Z
File surface added (stop on breach):
.claude/skills/checklist-test/SKILL.mdL266 only, one in-place rewrite at net 0 lines (≤120 B). The line says 「安全发现不立卡」 as a universal rule; under this card's private-repository branch it moves to the runner's own duty (the runner files no card for a security finding; the PM files the private card). Nothing else in that file. Same card, sameskip-changeset.Status: the card thread found the
security-findings.mdrule owes one line over the file's 64-line ceiling after three real same-file deletions. The ceiling question is with the maintainer; no raise is made without a ruling, and no PR opens until it lands.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 7, 2026
domain:skills#3 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAj7CvjkGXvgXzd6RZ7
Ruling recorded · 2026-11-07T07:54Z
Maintainer
huangyiireneruled at 2026-11-07T07:54Z (option A of the seat's question in the project thread): raise the line ceiling of.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/security-findings.mdfrom 64 to 65 for the one-line remainder the card thread measured after three real same-file deletions. Not option B (folding L31 and L47 into one line).Claim widened:
scripts/pm/check-skill-line-ratchet.mjs, that one row 64 → 65 only (it replaces "only to revert seat 1's ceiling raise" in the claim; seat 1's 64→65/67 raise, which cited the card body, is still reverted and this raise stands on this ruling instead). The PR body quotes this comment as the ruling. Nothing else moves.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 7, 2026
domain:skills#3 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAj7CvjkGXvgXzd6RZ7
Claim widened (contract review 6704473385, should-fix S1) · 2026-11-07T08:26Z
File surface added (stop on breach):
.claude/skills/pm-dispatch/references/project-forms.mdL48 only, one in-place rewrite at net 0 lines (≤120 B), so theNotify: securitydoorbell also rings when a private-repositorysecuritycard is built (「私卡建成」 beside or in place of 「草稿公告建成」, per the rule this card writes). Nothing else in that file. Same card, sameskip-changeset.S2 (the doorbell's bare
#Nnames no repository, read byscripts/pm/record-recognisers.mjs) is outside this claim and goes to a follow-up card.objectstack-fleet commentedon Nov 7, 2026
domain:skills#3 · huangyiirene · session_01J8VVAj7CvjkGXvgXzd6RZ7
ACCEPT → PR #31102 comment 6704825021, head
bb396b52. Tier S: ready + auto-merge by the seat. Follow-up: #31103 (repository-qualified doorbell).