You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 4, 2026. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 4, 2026. It is now read-only.
与 #3700 落地的写法保持一致即可:该文件对「已退场」项的既有惯例是条目不删、就地改写成当前形态 + 挂一个裸文本引用(:152 _(Removed — replaced by ViewConfigPanel)_、:1046 - [x] Tab-drag UX retired in favour of …、:82 … was removed as dead surface, #2564)。
Stale-premise check. Both lines still say what the body says they say, and both subjects are still gone: ROADMAP.md:857 (- [x] /system/permissions → PermissionManagementPage) and :871 (- [x] 11 new tests (SystemHubPage, AppManagementPage, PermissionManagementPage)), against a console that has six pages under src/pages/system/ — none of them PermissionManagementPage — and a deliberately absent system/permissions route, annotated as such at AppContent.tsx:191-201. PR #3699 (component deletion) and PR #3673 (URL redirects) are both merged, which is what made these two lines false; nothing since has touched them.
Why promote rather than hold, when the body itself grades it observation-class. The "zero runtime impact" reading is right and still doesn't settle it: the cost of a stale ROADMAP entry is paid by the next reader, and this repo has now paid it twice on this exact file family (#3655 and #3672 both started from a surface that looked ready-made). A checked box reading /system/permissions → PermissionManagementPage tells the next session to go wire up a page that does not exist, at a URL that is deliberately empty pending a ruling. That is a documentation defect with a concrete victim, not a cosmetic one — and unusually for a promotion, there is no open question about how to fix it: #3700's PR has already established the house form on the same file (entry kept, rewritten to current reality, bare-text reference), and the file has three existing precedents for it (:152, :1046, :82).
The wording constraint travels with the promotion and is not optional. The successor surface for /system/permissions is undecided — #3655 is open and carries needs-user-decision, weighing sys_capability against sys_permission_set. The rewrite must stay neutral ("pending maintainer decision, see #3655") and must not name either candidate. #3700's P1.12.2 line is the model to copy verbatim. An implementing seat that finds itself picking one is out of scope and should stop.
Why pm:blocked rather than straight queue.#3700 is pm:dispatched and in flight against the same file and the same ### P1.12 section (:825-839). Two agents editing ROADMAP.md concurrently is a merge race that costs more than serialising, and the wording this card must copy does not exist until #3700's PR lands. Sequence it behind, then it is a clean two-line change.
Not a duplicate.#3700 is the source card and its dispatch explicitly fenced its file面 to the other two blocks; these two lines were outside it and were reported rather than fixed, which is the discipline working. #3655 is the ruling this card must not pre-empt. #3670 is unrelated.
Activity
claude commentedon Aug 7, 2026
Findings triage — PROMOTE.
finding→pm:queue, pluspm:blocked/Blocked-by: objectui#3700.Stale-premise check. Both lines still say what the body says they say, and both subjects are still gone:
ROADMAP.md:857(- [x] /system/permissions → PermissionManagementPage) and:871(- [x] 11 new tests (SystemHubPage, AppManagementPage, PermissionManagementPage)), against a console that has six pages undersrc/pages/system/— none of themPermissionManagementPage— and a deliberately absentsystem/permissionsroute, annotated as such atAppContent.tsx:191-201. PR #3699 (component deletion) and PR #3673 (URL redirects) are both merged, which is what made these two lines false; nothing since has touched them.Why promote rather than hold, when the body itself grades it observation-class. The "zero runtime impact" reading is right and still doesn't settle it: the cost of a stale
ROADMAPentry is paid by the next reader, and this repo has now paid it twice on this exact file family (#3655 and #3672 both started from a surface that looked ready-made). A checked box reading/system/permissions → PermissionManagementPagetells the next session to go wire up a page that does not exist, at a URL that is deliberately empty pending a ruling. That is a documentation defect with a concrete victim, not a cosmetic one — and unusually for a promotion, there is no open question about how to fix it: #3700's PR has already established the house form on the same file (entry kept, rewritten to current reality, bare-text reference), and the file has three existing precedents for it (:152,:1046,:82).The wording constraint travels with the promotion and is not optional. The successor surface for
/system/permissionsis undecided — #3655 is open and carriesneeds-user-decision, weighingsys_capabilityagainstsys_permission_set. The rewrite must stay neutral ("pending maintainer decision, see #3655") and must not name either candidate. #3700's P1.12.2 line is the model to copy verbatim. An implementing seat that finds itself picking one is out of scope and should stop.Why
pm:blockedrather than straight queue. #3700 ispm:dispatchedand in flight against the same file and the same### P1.12section (:825-839). Two agents editingROADMAP.mdconcurrently is a merge race that costs more than serialising, and the wording this card must copy does not exist until #3700's PR lands. Sequence it behind, then it is a clean two-line change.Not a duplicate. #3700 is the source card and its dispatch explicitly fenced its file面 to the other two blocks; these two lines were outside it and were reported rather than fixed, which is the discipline working. #3655 is the ruling this card must not pre-empt. #3670 is unrelated.
本评论来自分诊座位 Routine(#5474 试点),不构成认领。
Generated by Claude Code
yinlianghui commentedon Aug 7, 2026
认领(PM 派发)。Session:
session_01GTRjn8xBqp75dk7kFupVRt;分支claude/issue-3704-roadmap-subblocks。文件面:ROADMAP.md:857/:871 两行(Routes/Tests 子块的同源漂移)。前置已落:PR #3705 已在 main(35e84b6),同文件障碍解除,行号经 #3705 的 15/15 中性改动仍准(以内容锚定复核)。处置照 PR #3705 全套:历史台账就地批注惯例、permissions 中性指向 #3655 不预判、纠错锚形态、#3656 措辞、门禁阳性对照打在被改行上。Generated by Claude Code
yinlianghui commentedon Aug 8, 2026
验收 ACCEPT → PR #3714(session_01GTRjn8xBqp75dk7kFupVRt)。
已核:2 增 2 删单文件;双行各打阳性对照;#3656 计量(活映射形态 1→0、计数 1→0、纠错锚 2→2 保留)含初稿自纠(组件名在箭头后仍是活映射位 — 与 #3705 初稿同错,诚实记录)。
裁决记录:
Generated by Claude Code
docs(ROADMAP): P1.12 Routes/Tests 两条 PermissionManagementPage 记录按现实改写 (…
docs(ROADMAP): P1.12/P1.16 的 MetadataManagerPage 铺与 Total 计数按现实改写 (ob…
docs(ROADMAP): P1.12.3 / P1.16 九条同源漂移按现实改写 (objectstack-ai#3738) (obj…