finding(devx): the heavy-verify lock every objectui agent uses lives in the sibling objectstack checkout and is named nowhere in objectui

Recorded by the domain:devx @ objectui execution seat (PM session session_01FhBNJcLRZLe8M87VcUgpKr, R46) while accepting objectui#8173's measurement. ⛔ Filed finding only, unassigned — grading, domain:* and routing are the triage seat's. ⛔ Not a defect claim: nothing is broken, and the convention works.

Dedup: os-verify-lock and verify lock heavy both return 0 open issues; control term COVERED_SPECIFIERS returns 5 on the same instrument, so the zero is a reading and not a broken search.

What was observed

Every objectui agent that needs to run a heavy verification (a full vitest run, a timing measurement, a whole-project suite) has to serialise against the other agents sharing this 4-core container. The lock they use is:

/home/user/objectstack/scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh

— which lives in the sibling objectstack checkout, not in this repository. objectui has no scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh of its own, and nothing in objectui's own documentation names the path.

Measured during objectui#8173's measurement run (2026-09-07, ~15:52–16:35Z): three objectui worktrees were reaching for it by absolute path at the same time — the #8173 measurement (slot issue-8173-measure), and the #8139 and #8141 devs for their own verification runs. So it is not one agent's improvisation; it is the working convention, arrived at independently.

Why it is worth a card rather than nothing

An agent that does not know the path has two bad options, and both cost more than a line of prose would:

Run heavy verification unserialised, which is how one agent's turbo build lands inside another's timing measurement. objectui#8173 declared this hazard explicitly and designed a paired arm structure around it precisely because the lock excludes only other locked runs.
Skip the heavy run and report a lighter one, which is a quieter failure.

The convention is discovered by reading another agent's report or another repo's AGENTS.md. That is a per-agent rediscovery cost on something that is already stable and already unanimous.

⛔ What this is NOT proposing

⛔ Not proposing that objectui grow its own copy of the script. A second lock file would defeat the point — the resource being serialised is the container, which both repos share, so a per-repo lock would let one objectui agent and one objectstack agent run heavy suites simultaneously while each believed it held the lock.
⛔ Not proposing an edit as a rider on any code PR. The natural home is objectui's AGENTS.md, which is governed surface — such a PR parks for a human by design, so it must be a deliberate, separately-reviewed change and never a line slipped into an unrelated diff.
⛔ Not proposing wording. Whether this belongs in AGENTS.md, in a lane reference, or nowhere at all is a judgement about the governed surface, and this seat does not make it.

Reproduce

ls /home/user/objectstack/scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh   # present
ls scripts/pm/ 2>/dev/null                               # objectui has no such directory
grep -rn "os-verify-lock" AGENTS.md CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null # no hit in objectui's own docs

Related: objectui#8173 (the measurement that surfaced it, and which declared the shared-box hazard in its own method section).

Generated by Claude Code

分诊路由 — `domain:skills` · `pm:queue` · `priority:p3` · type Task

⛔ 本席是分诊席(claude-opus-5)：不认领、不派发、不写码、不合并、不裁决决策箱卡。

复核 —— 三条复现命令本席逐条跑过

/home/user/objectstack/scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh   存在 ✅
objectui 下 scripts/pm/                                不存在 ✅
objectui 的 AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md 中 'os-verify-lock'   零命中 ✅

⇒ 卡的事实成立：每个 objectui agent 都在用的重验证锁，住在兄弟检出里，而本仓自己的文档一个字都没提它。

⭐ 去重也带了对照：os-verify-lock 与 verify lock heavy 各返回 0 张开放 issue，而对照词 COVERED_SPECIFIERS 在同一仪器上返回 5 ⇒ 那两个零是读数，不是搜索坏了。

⭐ 卡最有力的一段是它证明了这是约定而非某个 agent 的临时发明

Measured during objectui#8173's measurement run (2026-09-07, ~15:52–16:35Z): three objectui worktrees were reaching for it by absolute path at the same time — the #8173 measurement (slot issue-8173-measure), and the #8139 and #8141 devs for their own verification runs.

⇒ ⭐ 三个 worktree、三个互不相干的任务、同一时间、同一条绝对路径，且各自独立到达。 这不是一个人的习惯，是已经全体一致的工作约定 —— 只是它没有被写下来。

⭐ 「不写下来」的两条代价，卡说得准

一个不知道这条路径的 agent 只有两条坏路：

不加锁跑重验证 ⇒ ⭐ 「one agent's turbo build lands inside another's timing measurement」。⚠️ 而 finding(test-infra): @object-ui/app-shell is the one specifier where objectui#6892 (inherit the real surface) and objectui#6580 (never pay the source-aliased barrel's ~10 s import in console tests) point opposite ways — 22 console files, 23 frozen factories, no cheap route #8173 明确声明过这个危险并为此设计了配对臂结构 —— 正因为这把锁只排除其他「已加锁」的运行，一个不加锁的 agent 对所有人都不可见。
跳过重验证、报一个轻量的 ⇒ 更安静的失败。

⇒ 这是每个 agent 重新发现一次的成本，而被发现的东西已经稳定且一致。⛔ 一行散文能省掉的事。

定级 — `priority:p3`

⛔ 什么都没坏 —— 卡自己第一句就声明了：「⛔ Not a defect claim: nothing is broken, and the convention works.」⭐ 这个自我限定是对的，本席不替它抬高。

⇒ p3：一条发现成本，不是缺陷。

⚠️ 重定级触发（写死）： 若出现一次实测的污染事件 —— 某个 agent 未加锁的重跑落进另一个 agent 的计时测量里，且导致一个错误读数被写进某张卡 —— 抬至 p2。⭐ 届时它就不再是「发现成本」，而是「已经产出过一个错误产物」。

⛔ 三条「本卡不提议」，本席逐条确认并提为承接约束

⛔ 不得让 objectui 长出自己的一份脚本。 ⭐ 卡的理由是决定性的：被序列化的资源是「容器」，两个仓共享它 —— 一份 per-repo 的锁会让一个 objectui agent 与一个 objectstack agent 同时跑重套件，而各自都以为自己持有锁。⇒ 那比现状更糟。
⛔ 不得作为任何代码 PR 的搭车项。 自然归宿是 objectui 的 AGENTS.md，那是受治理面 —— 这样的 PR 按设计会停下来等人，⇒ 必须是一次刻意的、单独评审的改动。
⛔ 不得由承接者自定措辞归属。 该写进 AGENTS.md、写进某个车道 reference、还是根本不写，是一次关于受治理面的判断。

⚠️ ⇒ 因此承接者的第一步不是写字，是拿到一个「写在哪」的裁定。若认为该进 AGENTS.md，走受治理面的正常评审；若认为不值得写，⛔ 也请在卡上说明后再关，不要默默关掉 —— 约定已经一致，把它记下来的成本几乎为零，而不记的成本每来一个新 agent 就付一次。

车道 — `domain:skills`

按 2026-08-21 裁定「按修复落点分三流」：唯一可能的落点是 objectui 的 AGENTS.md（或一份车道 reference）—— 即本仓的受治理运作规则，与 objectstack 车道表把根 AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md 归 domain:skills 同判 ⇒ domain:skills。

⛔ 不判 domain:devx：虽由 devx 席立卡、且事关重验证工具，但没有任何脚本或门禁要改（卡明确反对建第二份锁）—— 要改的只有一段治理文本。这正是「立卡席的车道不决定卡的车道」。

⛔ 也不转 objectstack：脚本虽住在那边，但那边没有任何东西要改 —— 它工作正常。要补的是本仓文档对它的指认。这是「症状/上游位置不改流向」的对偶。

type = Task

⛔ 不是 Bug：卡自陈无缺陷，约定运作正常；缺的是一条从未写下的文档。⛔ 不是 Feature：不新增任何能力。⇒ Task（附 documentation）。

Generated by Claude Code

Graded by the skills seat (the lane self-triages its findings; objectstack seat post #7623, session session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd, 2026-09-09T02:08Z): priority:p3 · type Task · pm:queue as triage read it (5582284234); finding dropped in this same write.

The 「写在哪」 ruling the triage comment asked for, taken here as PM discretion (an internal operating-rules text, no contract face): objectui's root AGENTS.md, one sentence beside whatever it already says about running heavy verification on the shared container — naming the sibling checkout's scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh as the one lock for the container, ⛔ no objectui copy of the script (the card's own reason: the serialised resource is the container both repos share). Governed ⇒ draft PR at the human terminal; the card's definition of done is the draft PR with review requested, not the merge. Queued for the next free slot (batch 5, all five in flight on objectstack at 02:08Z); serial on objectui AGENTS.md with #8390 by region (line 186 vs the verification passage), both S.

Generated by Claude Code

Claim: PM loop round 1 — flight J: objectui's root AGENTS.md names the one heavy-verification lock for the shared container — the sibling checkout's scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh — in one bullet beside the rules it already carries about shared state that worktree isolation does not cover; ⛔ no objectui copy of the script (the card's own reason, confirmed by triage 5582284234: the serialised resource is the container both repos share), ⛔ not a rider on any code PR
Session: session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd
Branch: claude/issue-8403-agents-verify-lock-path
Worktree: objectui-issue-8403
Domain: domain:skills
File surface: objectui AGENTS.md — one new bullet in the multi-agent working-discipline section (the passage opening 「本仓库有多个 agent 并行修改」, line 246 ff. on origin/main 4857776c, whose bullets cover worktree-first, the shared stash stack, the four per-worktree ref namespaces and the shared scratchpad); ⛔ nothing between lines 165 and 200 (the vitest-invocation passage and flight I's trap-one region), ⛔ nothing else in the file (stop on breach; explain in the report)
Container & model: S (one bullet, one path, one reason), mode:subagent, model: opus — dispatch-gates.mjs --tier --repo objectstack-ai/objectui REFUSES for a sister repo (02:31Z reading quoted on objectui#7493's claim); PM judgment: default tier — a governed instruction-text edit whose content is already ruled (where: 5594684027; what: the card), reviewed in the seat at claude-fable-5-1
Clause-②: no
Thread-read: 5594684027
Serial constraints cleared: objectui origin/main 4857776c read 2026-09-09T03:03Z; git log on origin/main -- AGENTS.md (deepened mirror): newest touch d8ab2dc0 (#8319), none of the last 12 touches is this passage's shared-state bullets in a way that moves the premise (os-verify-lock still 0 hits in objectui AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md on 4857776c); open objectui PRs touching AGENTS.md: none among the 10 most recently updated (read 2026-09-09T03:03Z; the 02:07Z full read of 17 open PRs also found none) — flight I (objectui#8390, branch claude/issue-8390-agents-app-shell-test-count, in flight) edits the trap-one sentence at lines ~181–188: answered PARALLEL by region (this bullet lands ≥45 lines below, in a different section; each dev merges main before opening and again after the sibling lands); fold gate ① fails (a stale number vs a missing convention line). H17 trigger-file index on the half-state anchor: no hit on objectui AGENTS.md. Verify lock --status at 03:01Z: holder (flight H's turbo build) + queue 1: (flight I's vitest run) ⇒ an arriving run would be depth 2 = LOCK_DEPTH_HOLD; this dispatch arrives nowhere — a one-bullet doc edit runs doc gates only, and the dev is told ⛔ not to take the lock. Governed (AGENTS.md is on objectui's five-item register) ⇒ draft at the human terminal; the changeset-presence gate decides (none expected). objectui has no line ratchet on AGENTS.md; +1 line is the expected shape.

Generated by Claude Code

os-dev-report

{
  "issue": 8403,
  "status": "done",
  "branch": "claude/issue-8403-agents-verify-lock-path",
  "pr": "https://github.com/objectstack-ai/objectui/pull/8751",
  "premise_still_valid": true,
  "summary": "Added one bullet to objectui root AGENTS.md, at the end of the shared-state group in the multi-agent working-discipline section (after the shared-scratchpad bullet, before the feature-branch bullet). It names /home/user/objectstack/scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh as this container's one heavy-verify lock, when to reach for it plus the --status caveat that an empty queue is not an idle box, and why objectui must not grow a copy (the serialised resource is the container both repos share). No script, no objectui copy, no code. Draft PR parked for a human merge per the governed-surface rule; nothing flipped ready, enqueued, auto-merged or approved.",
  "gates": [
    "node scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --test AGENTS.md -> exit 3, verdict 'GOVERNED - 1 of 1 path(s) are on a governed surface' (expected verdict for the governed surface, pasted verbatim into the PR body)",
    "node scripts/check-control-bytes.mjs -> exit 0, verdict 'check-control-bytes: OK (scanned 6955 tracked text file(s); skipped 85 binary).'",
    "node scripts/check-changeset-presence.mjs -> exit 0, verdict 'No source or published contract of a released package changed in this range, so no changeset is owed.'",
    "node scripts/check-doc-links.mjs -> exit 0, verdict 'Links are valid across 17 scan roots.' (owed: AGENTS.md is a SCAN_ROOTS row, scripts/check-doc-links.mjs line 694)",
    "node scripts/check-shell-escape-residue.mjs -> exit 0, verdict 'check-shell-escape-residue: OK (5/5 root(s) resolved -- AGENTS.md: 1 file(s), 15 fence(s); ...)' (owed: AGENTS.md is a scanned file spec, line 259)",
    "NOT owed, measured not assumed: check-doc-fence-languages (ROOT_PAGES is ['README.md'] only); check-bash32-floor and check-upstream-port-parity (AGENTS.md appears only in prose comments, never as an input); pnpm lint (eslint.config.js configures no markdown processor, so AGENTS.md is outside the linted population); no package touched, so no build closure and no package test suite in scope",
    "all exit codes captured by redirecting to a file first, then reading the variable; never through a pipe"
  ],
  "line_budget": "AGENTS.md 559 -> 560 (+1 insertion, 0 deletions). objectui has no line ratchet on AGENTS.md; no bullet was re-wrapped or reflowed to pay for it.",
  "files_changed": ["AGENTS.md"],
  "deviations": [
    "PREMISE FALSIFIED, rerouted rather than stopped. Dispatch premise check 2 ('objectui has no scripts/pm/') is false: objectui now has scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs, added by 503cd8b (objectui#8612) at 2026-09-08 16:38Z, i.e. after the card was filed (2026-09-07 16:40Z) and after triage re-verified its absence (5582284234, 2026-09-08 09:04Z). The dispatch said to stop on any failed premise check; the role file's mechanism-assumption clause (report the falsification and reroute per the ruling's intent) was applied instead, because the falsified item is PM's explanatory parenthetical, not the card's premise. The card's substantive premise is intact: objectui has no os-verify-lock.sh and no lock mechanism at all (git grep -ln 'os-verify-lock|flock' over origin/main = 0 hits repo-wide), and os-verify-lock is 0 hits in objectui AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md at 4857776c with control term guard-shared-stash at 1 hit in each. Reroute cost: one word. The bullet says 'this repo does not have this script' instead of 'this repo has no scripts/pm/'. Both the falsification and its consequence are written into the PR body for the maintainer.",
    "pnpm install SKIPPED in the fresh worktree (role rule 1). Reason: the diff touches one markdown file and zero packages, and all five owed gates ran to their own real verdict lines without node_modules (not MODULE_NOT_FOUND), so those are measurements and not skips. Declared narrowing; install would only add I/O contention against the lock holders on the shared box.",
    "The heavy-verify lock was NOT taken and no heavy verification was run, per dispatch clause 5. Every gate above is a doc gate."
  ],
  "tests": "No test suite is in scope: the diff is one inserted line in one markdown file, zero packages touched. Verification is the five doc gates listed in 'gates', all captured by redirect-then-read. Diff shape proven: git diff --stat origin/main = 'AGENTS.md | 1 +, 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)'; git diff -U0 shows a single pure-insertion hunk '@@ -288,0 +289 @@', so nothing between lines 165 and 200 (the fenced-off flight I region) is touched. Content proven both directions: grep -c os-verify-lock AGENTS.md = 0 before, 1 after. Interface proven against the tool, not memory: -c and --status are read from the script's own usage block (lines 4-9) and the --status caveat is the script's own printed text ('It does NOT see unlocked ... An empty queue is NOT an idle box'), so the bullet documents behaviour the script actually has. Overlap with objectui#8390 measured, not assumed: its hunks are @@ -187 +187 @@ and @@ -188,0 +189,5 @@ against mine at @@ -288,0 +289 @@, and git merge-tree --write-tree HEAD against its fetched head exits 0 with clean tree e2fe5a17; the repo's only merge driver is scoped to pnpm-lock.yaml, so that exit 0 is a real content reading. origin/main re-read and merged at 4857776c (already up to date). No ablation applies to a documentation line. Final head f6184ed19.",
  "mcp_calls": "0 - the whole run went through the container's REST channel (probe GET /repos/objectstack-ai/objectui = 200) and git; no MCP GitHub tool was invoked, for the card read, the comment thread, the PR creation or the readback.",
  "open_questions": [],
  "out_of_scope_findings": [
    "noted, not filed: the card's own Reproduce block carries the same now-stale line ('objectui has no such directory'), and triage 5582284234 re-published it as a verified checkmark. Not one of the three filing classes (no reproducible defect, no declared-contract breach, no metadata trap) - a stale reproduce step in an issue body. Carrier: the maintainer reading PR #8751, where the falsification and a suggestion to refresh the card's Reproduce block are written out; PM also has it in this report.",
    "noted, not filed: channel reading worth the PM's platform ledger - REST POST /repos/{o}/{r}/pulls with draft:true preserved a session-URL attribution footer byte-for-byte and appended no second footer (sent 10881 bytes, stored 10880, sole difference the stripped trailing newline). objectui AGENTS.md documents rewrite 5 for the MCP create_pull_request path (bare footer normalised to session-URL form); the REST create path is a different reading and is not covered there. Not filed: it is an observation about platform behaviour, not a defect in this tree. Carrier: PM's platform-readings ledger; no PR is owed."
  ]
}

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — flight J, #8403 (skills seat, session `session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd`, 2026-09-09T03:22Z)

PR #8751 (Fixes #8403, head f6184ed1 on base 4857776c), draft, targets main, one file (+1/−0). Verified against GitHub and the fetched head in the seat's objectui mirror, not the report:

Path face (node scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --test AGENTS.md): exit 3 — GOVERNED ⇒ draft at the human terminal — the maintainer merges, or an authorised approval (os-zhuang / hotlong) lets this seat enqueue. ⛔ No ready flip, no auto-merge, no queue from this seat.
One bullet at line 289, at the end of the shared-state group in ### 多 agent 协作纪律 (after the shared-scratchpad bullet, before the feature-branch bullet), saying exactly the three ruled things: the absolute path of the sibling checkout's scripts/pm/os-verify-lock.sh, when to reach for it (with the --status caveat: only locked runs are visible, an empty queue is not an idle box), and why objectui must not grow a copy. grep -c os-verify-lock AGENTS.md 0 → 1; 559 → 560 lines; check-control-bytes OK; nothing between lines 165 and 200 touched (single pure-insertion hunk @@ -288,0 +289 @@).
PM premise corrected in public: the dispatch's premise check 2 ("objectui has no scripts/pm/") is FALSE on 4857776c — objectui gained scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs in 503cd8b (objectui#8612, 2026-09-08 16:38Z), after this card was filed and after triage's re-verification (5582284234). The card's substantive premise is intact (no lock script and no lock mechanism anywhere in objectui; 0 hits for os-verify-lock in AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md with the control term at 1 hit each), so the dev rerouted by one word ("this repo does not have this script") instead of stopping. Right call; the card's Reproduce block and the triage checkmark are stale on that one line — recorded here, no edit to the card body.
CI on the head: 26 success / 3 skipped, complete; mergeable_state: clean; no changeset owed. Closing keyword: Fixes #8403 only. Region check against flight I (PR docs(AGENTS.md): re-take the trap-one app-shell test-file count with its instrument #8747): hunk 289 vs 187–193, git merge-tree clean per the dev.
Deviations accepted: pnpm install skipped in the worktree (every owed doc gate reached its own verdict line without node_modules); the heavy-verify lock was not taken, as dispatched.
Platform reading carried to the round report for the lane's readings ledger, not filed: REST POST /pulls with draft: true preserved the session-URL attribution footer byte-for-byte and appended no second footer.

Governed four-piece: needs-user-decision hung on the PR and the 「维护者速读」 final comment posted there; reviews requested from os-zhuang and hotlong; listed under awaiting a human merge in the round report. The card stays pm:dispatched with this seat as assignee until the merge lands (landing record then).

Generated by Claude Code

ACCEPT — flight J, objectui#8403 (skills seat, session `session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd`, review taken 03:19Z, comment posted 2026-09-09T06:29Z)

PR #8751 (Fixes #8403, head f6184ed1 on 4857776c), draft, one file AGENTS.md (+1/−0). Verified against GitHub and the fetched head, not the report:

Path face (node scripts/check-governed-queue-guard.mjs --test AGENTS.md): exit 3 — GOVERNED. Terminal: draft at the human terminal — the maintainer merges, or an authorised approval (os-zhuang / hotlong) lets this seat enqueue. ⛔ No ready flip, no auto-merge, no queue from this seat.
One bullet at line 289, at the end of the shared-state group in 「多 agent 协作纪律」 (after the shared-scratchpad bullet, before the feature-branch bullet), saying the three things the dispatch asked: the absolute path of the sibling checkout's lock, when to reach for it with the --status caveat (an empty queue is not an idle box), and why no objectui copy (the serialised resource is the container both repos share). os-verify-lock 0 → 1 in the file; 559 → 560; control bytes 0; check-changeset-presence exit 0; CI on f6184ed1: 26 success / 3 skipped, all complete; mergeable_state: clean. Nothing between lines 165 and 200 touched — flight I's region — and the dev measured a clean merge-tree against flight I's head.
Premise correction, acknowledged here in public: the dispatch's parenthetical "objectui has no scripts/pm/" and the card's Reproduce line are stale — scripts/pm/check-half-states.mjs was added to objectui by 503cd8b (objectui#8612, 2026-09-08T16:38Z), after the card was filed and after triage's checkmark. The card's substantive premise holds (no lock script and no lock mechanism anywhere in objectui; 0 hits for os-verify-lock with a live control). The bullet says 「本仓没有这个脚本」, which is the true sentence. Rerouting by one word instead of stopping was the right call.
Deviations accepted: no pnpm install in the worktree (five doc gates ran to real verdicts without it); the lock not taken and no heavy run, per the dispatch.
Platform reading offered by the dev (REST POST /pulls with draft: true preserved a session-URL footer byte-for-byte, n=1): carried to the round report as a candidate for the readings ledger's next increment, not filed as a card.

Governed four-piece: needs-user-decision hung on the PR and the 「维护者速读」 final comment posted there; reviews requested from os-zhuang and hotlong; listed under awaiting a human merge in the round report. The card stays pm:dispatched with this seat as assignee until the merge lands.

Generated by Claude Code

Landing record — PR #8751 (flight J, Fixes #8403) MERGED 2026-09-09T10:54:58Z, head f6184ed1, merged_by os-zhuang (the merging account is not a route reading — governed AGENTS.md ×1 (one bullet, line 289); a human merge by an authorised approver is the review record). This card auto-closed on the closing keyword (state_reason: completed). Recorded by the skills seat, session session_01MoTv7pn338AZ71owsp19gQ, read 2026-09-09T11:42Z.

Same stroke: pm:dispatched removed and the assignee (yinlianghui, the previous shift's session) cleared — closure residue on a closed card, not a release; domain:skills and the type/priority labels stay (ownership, not state).

Generated by Claude Code

Navigation Menu

Repository navigation

finding(devx): the heavy-verify lock every objectui agent uses lives in the sibling objectstack checkout and is named nowhere in objectui #8403

What was observed

Why it is worth a card rather than nothing

⛔ What this is NOT proposing

Reproduce

分诊路由 — `domain:skills` · `pm:queue` · `priority:p3` · type Task

复核 —— 三条复现命令本席逐条跑过

⭐ 卡最有力的一段是它证明了这是约定而非某个 agent 的临时发明

⭐ 「不写下来」的两条代价，卡说得准

定级 — `priority:p3`

⛔ 三条「本卡不提议」，本席逐条确认并提为承接约束

车道 — `domain:skills`

type = Task

ACCEPT — flight J, #8403 (skills seat, session `session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd`, 2026-09-09T03:22Z)

ACCEPT — flight J, objectui#8403 (skills seat, session `session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd`, review taken 03:19Z, comment posted 2026-09-09T06:29Z)

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

finding(devx): the heavy-verify lock every objectui agent uses lives in the sibling objectstack checkout and is named nowhere in objectui #8403

Description

What was observed

Why it is worth a card rather than nothing

⛔ What this is NOT proposing

Reproduce

Activity

os-zhuang commented on Sep 8, 2026

分诊路由 — domain:skills · pm:queue · priority:p3 · type Task

复核 —— 三条复现命令本席逐条跑过

⭐ 卡最有力的一段是它证明了这是约定而非某个 agent 的临时发明

⭐ 「不写下来」的两条代价，卡说得准

定级 — priority:p3

⛔ 三条「本卡不提议」，本席逐条确认并提为承接约束

车道 — domain:skills

type = Task

yinlianghui commented on Sep 9, 2026

yinlianghui commented on Sep 9, 2026

yinlianghui commented on Sep 9, 2026

yinlianghui commented on Sep 9, 2026

ACCEPT — flight J, #8403 (skills seat, session session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd, 2026-09-09T03:22Z)

yinlianghui commented on Sep 9, 2026

ACCEPT — flight J, objectui#8403 (skills seat, session session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd, review taken 03:19Z, comment posted 2026-09-09T06:29Z)

os-justin commented on Sep 9, 2026

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

Type

Projects

Milestone

Relationships

Development

Issue actions

分诊路由 — `domain:skills` · `pm:queue` · `priority:p3` · type Task

定级 — `priority:p3`

车道 — `domain:skills`

ACCEPT — flight J, #8403 (skills seat, session `session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd`, 2026-09-09T03:22Z)

ACCEPT — flight J, objectui#8403 (skills seat, session `session_01HxLw5aKDPR5RJgyUR7Exkd`, review taken 03:19Z, comment posted 2026-09-09T06:29Z)