Skip to content

experimental feature "collab" is broken on main for API/free/plus/go users #11764

Closed

Description

@lattwood

What version of Codex CLI is running?

main

What subscription do you have?

N/A

Which model were you using?

gpt-5.2-codex

What platform is your computer?

No response

What terminal emulator and version are you using (if applicable)?

N/A

What issue are you seeing?

After @jif-oai merged #11745, hardcoding the Explorer AgentRole to have a fixed model override of gpt-5.3-codex-spark where it used to be gpt-5.1-codex-mini, trying to use the Experimental collab feature no longer works for users on a Free or Plus subscription as they don't have access to Codex Spark, as well as people using Codex CLI via API.

What steps can reproduce the bug?

Enable collab via /experimental or via editing ~/.codex/config.toml, and watch as it fails to explore due to model unavailability.

› Hey, use the explorer subagents to explain what models are used for exploring.


• Agent spawned
  └ call: call_9DPDLA2CS27lsprBo65AphhM
    agent: 019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7
    status: pending init
    prompt: Find and explain which models are used for explorer subagents in this repo or docs. Look for any configuration/docs about explorer model selection.

• Waiting for agents
  └ call: call_ZR2b8AqVEiBggFUhdilh1PC1
    receivers: 019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7

• Wait complete
  └ call: call_ZR2b8AqVEiBggFUhdilh1PC1
    agents: 1 total · 1 errored
    019c5844-deb4-78e3-aa34-cffbb4be15e7 errored: { "error": { "message": "The requested model 'gpt-5.3-codex-spark' does not exist.", "type": "invalid_request_error", "param": "model", "code": "model_not_fo...

What is the expected behavior?

I'd expect that if something is exposed via /experimental it wouldn't regress in such a way.

I'd completely understand this happening (but would still be bummed) if this was marked as Stage.UnderDevelopment.

Additional information

No response

Activity

  1. lattwood commented on Feb 13, 2026

    @lattwood
    Author

    They're similar but not duplicates

  2. added a commit that references this issue on Feb 13, 2026
  3. lattwood commented on Feb 13, 2026

    @lattwood
    Author

    <3 ty

  4. Szpadel commented on Feb 13, 2026

    @Szpadel

    @jif-oai could we maybe get configuration option for this? Or have spark with mini as a fallback?

  5. lattwood commented on Feb 13, 2026

    @lattwood
    Author

    @Szpadel I'm planning to compile it myself to use this exact change this weekend on my personal pro account

  6. MrLightspeed commented on Feb 14, 2026

    @MrLightspeed

    Pro level options would be ideal. If someone qualifies for a higher tier, let them benefit.

  7. jif-oai commented on Feb 16, 2026

    @jif-oai
    Contributor

    Would this be sufficient? #11899

  8. Szpadel commented on Feb 16, 2026

    @Szpadel

    @jif-oai that is perfect, thank you

  9. added a commit that references this issue on Jun 8, 2026
  10. added a commit that references this issue on Jun 27, 2026
  11. added a commit that references this issue on Aug 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    CLIIssues related to the Codex CLIbugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions